Independent Researcher, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Hist Neurosci. 2021 Apr-Jun;30(2):141-154. doi: 10.1080/0964704X.2020.1789937. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
Over the centuries, people have tried to determine character traits from a person's appearance, beginning with the physiognomic efforts of the Greek philosophers Socrates (ca. 470-399 bce) and Aristotle (384-322 bce) and still continuing today. In this quest, the discovery of criminal tendencies from someone's face always received special attention. This was also an important issue for physician Franz Joseph Gall (1758-1828). Gall maintained that a criminal's skull had a different shape than that of a law-abiding person. Phrenologists, as well as criminologists, including Cesare Lombroso (1835-1909), further propagated Gall's ideas and investigated countless heads of violent and petty criminals. This line of investigation led to much discussion and criticism. Were Gall, the phrenologists who followed him, and Lombroso sufficiently objective? Were these men really onto something, or were they led by prejudices? After Lombroso's time, physiognomy and cranioscopy were discredited. However, in the last decades, some researchers are again trying to find out whether people are indeed able to distinguish violent criminals from nonviolent criminals on the basis of their faces.
几个世纪以来,人们一直试图从一个人的外表来判断性格特征,这可以追溯到古希腊哲学家苏格拉底(公元前 470-399 年)和亚里士多德(公元前 384-322 年)的面相努力,这种研究一直持续到今天。在这个探索过程中,从某人的脸上发现犯罪倾向总是受到特别关注。这也是医生弗朗茨·约瑟夫·加尔(Franz Joseph Gall)(1758-1828 年)关注的重要问题。加尔认为,罪犯的头骨形状与守法者的头骨形状不同。颅相学家,以及犯罪学家,包括切萨雷·龙勃罗梭(Cesare Lombroso)(1835-1909 年),进一步传播了加尔的思想,并研究了无数暴力和轻微犯罪者的头部。这条调查线索引发了很多讨论和批评。加尔、他之后的颅相学家以及龙勃罗梭是否足够客观?这些人真的有发现,还是他们受到了偏见的影响?龙勃罗梭之后,面相学和颅相学已经名誉扫地。然而,在过去几十年中,一些研究人员再次试图找出人们是否真的能够根据面部特征将暴力罪犯与非暴力罪犯区分开来。