Sakalauskaitė-Juodeikienė Eglė, Eling Paul, Finger Stanley
a Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery , Center for Neurology, Vilnius University , Vilnius , Lithuania.
b Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University , Nijmegen , The Netherlands.
J Hist Neurosci. 2017 Oct-Dec;26(4):385-405. doi: 10.1080/0964704X.2017.1332561. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
Much has been written about the development and reception of Franz Joseph Gall's (1758-1828) ideas in Western Europe. There has been little coverage, however, of how his Schädellehre or organology was received in Eastern Europe. With this in mind, we examined the transmission and acceptance/rejection of Gall's doctrine in Vilnius (now Lithuania). We shall focus on what two prominent professors at Vilnius University felt about organology. The first of these men was Andrew Sniadecki (1768-1838), who published an article on Gall's system in the journal Dziennik Wileński in 1805. The second is his contemporary, Joseph Frank (1771-1842), who wrote about the doctrine in his memoirs and published an article on phrenology in the journal Bibliotheca Italiana in 1839. Both Frank and Sniadecki had previously worked in Vienna's hospitals, where they became acquainted with Gall and his system, but they formed different opinions. Sniadecki explained the doctrine not only to students and doctors but also to the general public in Vilnius, believing the new science had merit. Frank, in contrast, attempted to prove the futility of cranioscopy. Briefer mention will be made of the assessments of Johann Peter Frank (1745-1821) and Ludwig Heinrich Bojanus (1776-1827), two other physicians who overlapped Gall in Vienna and went to Vilnius afterward. Additionally, we shall bring up how a rich collection of human skulls was used for teaching purposes at Vilnius University, and how students were encouraged to mark the organs on crania using Gall's system. Though organology in Vilnius, as in many other places, was always controversial, it was taught at the university, accepted by many medical professionals, and discussed by an inquisitive public.
关于弗朗茨·约瑟夫·加尔(1758 - 1828)的思想在西欧的发展与接受情况,已有诸多著述。然而,对于他的颅相学或器官学在东欧的接受情况,却鲜有报道。鉴于此,我们考察了加尔的学说在维尔纽斯(现属立陶宛)的传播以及被接受/拒斥的情况。我们将聚焦于维尔纽斯大学的两位杰出教授对器官学的看法。其中第一位是安德鲁·斯尼亚德茨基(1768 - 1838),他于1805年在《维尔纽斯文汇报》上发表了一篇关于加尔体系的文章。第二位是与他同时代的约瑟夫·弗兰克(1771 - 1842),他在回忆录中论述了该学说,并于1839年在《意大利文库》杂志上发表了一篇关于颅相学的文章。弗兰克和斯尼亚德茨基此前都曾在维也纳的医院工作,在那里他们结识了加尔及其体系,但他们形成了不同的观点。斯尼亚德茨基不仅向维尔纽斯的学生和医生,还向普通大众讲解该学说,他认为这门新科学有其价值。相比之下,弗兰克试图证明颅骨检查的无用性。对于约翰·彼得·弗兰克(1745 - 1821)和路德维希·海因里希·博亚努斯(1776 - 1827)的评价将作简要提及,这两位医生也曾在维也纳与加尔共事,之后前往了维尔纽斯。此外,我们还将提及维尔纽斯大学是如何利用一批丰富的人类头骨用于教学目的,以及学生们是如何被鼓励使用加尔的体系在颅骨上标注器官的。尽管在维尔纽斯,如同在许多其他地方一样,器官学一直存在争议,但它在大学里被讲授,被许多医学专业人士所接受,并受到好奇公众的讨论。