• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全国范围内延长标准供体应用的趋势及其对肺移植结局的影响。

National Trends in Extended Criteria Donor Utilization and Outcomes for Lung Transplantation.

机构信息

Division of Lung Transplant and Lung Failure, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Feb;111(2):421-426. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.05.087. Epub 2020 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.05.087
PMID:32663473
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Extended criteria donor (ECD) for lung transplantation (LTx) have been implemented due to the donor organ shortage. The impact on recipient survival is under investigation. We report trends in the use of extended criteria lungs in the modern era and its association with survival outcomes using a large national database.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of all adult LTx from May 2005 to December 2018 using the United Network for Organ Sharing database. ECD were defined by 2 or more variances from standard criteria: age ≥ 55 years, pO2 ≤ 300, pack years ≥ 20, diabetes, purulent bronchoscopy, blood infection, or abnormal chest radiographs. Transplant centers were dichotomized based on volume. Recipient survival was analyzed using lung allocation score as a covariate.

RESULTS

Of 24,888 LTx, 80% had extended criteria; 42% had 2 or more extensions and were deemed ECD in this analysis. Both LTx volume (2005: 1352; 2018: 2495) and use of ECD (2005: 27% ECD, 2018: 50% ECD) have increased over the study period. Survival of LTx recipients has steadily increased (2005: 82% 1-year survival in 2005; 2017: 90% 1-year survival). High-volume centers (>47 annual LTx) utilized ECD in 46% of transplants compared with 40% ECD among other centers. Recipients of ECD and standard criteria organs had no difference in 1-year survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor supply limits the number of LTx performed. Extension of donor criteria has occurred alongside increased overall LTx volume. Use of ECD did not compromise 30-day, 90-day, nor 1-year survival. Further studies are warranted to define long-term outcomes.

摘要

背景

由于供体器官短缺,已经实施了延长标准供体(ECD)用于肺移植(LTx)。正在研究这对受者存活率的影响。我们使用大型国家数据库报告了现代时代扩展标准肺的使用趋势及其与生存结果的关联。

方法

我们使用美国器官共享网络数据库对 2005 年 5 月至 2018 年 12 月期间的所有成人 LTx 进行了回顾性分析。ECD 的定义是标准标准有 2 个或更多变异:年龄≥55 岁,pO2≤300,包年≥20,糖尿病,脓性支气管镜检查,血感染或异常胸片。根据体积将移植中心分为两类。使用肺分配评分作为协变量分析受者存活率。

结果

在 24888 例 LTx 中,80%为延长标准;在本分析中,42%有 2 个或更多扩展,被认为是 ECD。LTx 数量(2005 年:1352;2018 年:2495)和 ECD 的使用(2005 年:27%ECD,2018 年:50%ECD)在研究期间均有所增加。LTx 受者的存活率稳步提高(2005 年:2005 年 1 年生存率为 82%;2017 年:1 年生存率为 90%)。与其他中心相比,高容量中心(>47 例/年 LTx)在 46%的移植中使用了 ECD。ECD 和标准标准器官的受者在 1 年生存率上没有差异。

结论

供体供应限制了 LTx 的数量。供体标准的扩展是伴随着整体 LTx 数量的增加而发生的。使用 ECD 并没有影响 30 天,90 天和 1 年的生存率。需要进一步的研究来定义长期结果。

相似文献

1
National Trends in Extended Criteria Donor Utilization and Outcomes for Lung Transplantation.全国范围内延长标准供体应用的趋势及其对肺移植结局的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Feb;111(2):421-426. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.05.087. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
2
Extended criteria donor lungs do not impact recipient outcomes in pediatric transplantation.扩展标准供体肺不影响儿科移植受者的结局。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 May;38(5):560-569. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
3
Extended criteria donor lungs and clinical outcome: results of an alternative allocation algorithm.扩大标准供体肺与临床结局:一种替代分配算法的结果
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013 Nov;32(11):1065-72. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2013.06.021. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
4
The use of extended criteria donors decreases one-year survival in high-risk lung recipients: A review of the United Network of Organ Sharing Database.扩展标准供者的使用降低了高危肺受者的一年生存率:对美国器官共享网络数据库的回顾。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Sep;152(3):891-898.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.03.096. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
5
Extended Criteria Donor Use in Lung Transplants From Donation After Controlled Circulatory Death.从控制性循环死亡供体中使用扩展标准供体进行肺移植。
Transplant Proc. 2024 Sep;56(7):1633-1638. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.07.003. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
6
Validation of a novel donor lung scoring system based on the updated lung Composite Allocation Score.基于更新的肺综合分配评分的新型供肺评分系统的验证。
Am J Transplant. 2024 Jul;24(7):1279-1288. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.03.032. Epub 2024 Mar 24.
7
Explainable variation in renal transplant outcomes: a comparison of standard and expanded criteria donors.肾移植结果的可解释变异:标准和扩大标准供体的比较。
Clin Transpl. 2004:303-14.
8
Traumatically Brain-Injured Donors and the Impact on Lung Transplantation Survival.创伤性脑损伤供体与肺移植存活率的关系。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Sep;106(3):842-847. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.03.075. Epub 2018 May 3.
9
Mitigating the Impact of Using Female Donor Hearts in Male Recipients Using BMI Difference.利用 BMI 差异减轻使用女性供体心脏给男性受者带来的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Apr;111(4):1299-1307. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.06.109. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
10
Dual Procurement of Lung and Heart Allografts Does Not Negatively Affect Lung Transplant Outcomes.肺和心脏供体的双重获取不会对肺移植结果产生负面影响。
J Surg Res. 2021 Mar;259:106-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.11.036. Epub 2020 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond boundaries: Redefining the donor frontier in pediatric lung transplantation.超越界限:重新定义小儿肺移植的供体范围
JHLT Open. 2025 Jul 25;10:100355. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100355. eCollection 2025 Nov.
2
Impact of the Composite Allocation Score on Lung Transplant Waitlist and Posttransplant Outcomes.综合分配评分对肺移植等待名单及移植后结局的影响。
Transplant Direct. 2025 Jun 27;11(7):e1836. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001836. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Impact of donor organ quality on recipient outcomes in lung transplantation: 14-Year single-center experience using the Eurotransplant lung donor score.
供体器官质量对肺移植受者预后的影响:使用欧洲移植肺供体评分的14年单中心经验
JHLT Open. 2024 Oct 11;6:100166. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2024.100166. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
European Society of Organ Transplantation (ESOT) Consensus Statement on Machine Perfusion in Cardiothoracic Transplant.欧洲器官移植学会(ESOT)关于心胸移植中机器灌注的共识声明。
Transpl Int. 2024 Nov 22;37:13112. doi: 10.3389/ti.2024.13112. eCollection 2024.
5
Donor sequence number is not associated with worse lung transplant outcomes regardless of transplant center case volume.供体序列号与较差的肺移植结果无关,无论移植中心的病例数量如何。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2025 Apr;44(4):585-591. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.11.012. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
6
Thoracic organ machine perfusion: A review of concepts with a focus on reconditioning therapies.胸部器官机器灌注:以修复治疗为重点的概念综述
Front Transplant. 2023 Mar 22;2:1060992. doi: 10.3389/frtra.2023.1060992. eCollection 2023.
7
Lung Donation and Transplant Recipient Outcomes at Independent vs Hospital-Based Donor Care Units.独立供肺者照护单位与医院附设供肺者照护单位对肺脏捐赠及移植受赠者预后之影响。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2417107. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.17107.
8
Validation of a novel donor lung scoring system based on the updated lung Composite Allocation Score.基于更新的肺综合分配评分的新型供肺评分系统的验证。
Am J Transplant. 2024 Jul;24(7):1279-1288. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.03.032. Epub 2024 Mar 24.
9
Scoring donor lungs for graft failure risk: The Lung Donor Risk Index (LDRI).为移植物衰竭风险对供体肺进行评分:肺供体风险指数(LDRI)。
Am J Transplant. 2024 May;24(5):839-849. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.01.022. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
10
Beating the odds: long-term survival after lung transplantation.战胜困难:肺移植后的长期生存
J Thorac Dis. 2023 Sep 28;15(9):4558-4560. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1018. Epub 2023 Sep 11.