Suppr超能文献

美国儿科麻醉-危重病双重培训从业者调查:联合儿科麻醉-危重病实践现状。

The Current State of Combined Pediatric Anesthesiology-Critical Care Practice: A Survey of Dual-Trained Practitioners in the United States.

机构信息

From the Departments of Anesthesiology.

Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2021 Jan;132(1):194-201. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Combined practice in pediatric anesthesiology (PA) and pediatric critical care medicine (PCCM) was historically common but has declined markedly with time. The reasons for this temporal shift are unclear, but existing evidence suggests that length of training is a barrier to contemporary trainees. Among current practitioners, restriction in dual-specialty practice also occurs, for reasons that are unknown at present. We sought to describe the demographics of this population, investigate their perceptions about the field, and consider factors that lead to attrition.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional, observational study of physicians in the United States with a combined practice in PA and PCCM. The survey was distributed electronically and anonymously to the distribution list of the Pediatric Anesthesia Leadership Council (PALC) of the Society for Pediatric Anesthesia (SPA), directing the recipients to forward the link to their faculty meeting our inclusion criteria. Attending-level respondents (n = 62) completed an anonymous, 40-question multidomain survey.

RESULTS

Forty-seven men and 15 women, with a median age of 51, completed the survey. Major leadership positions are held by 44%, and 55% are externally funded investigators. A minority (26%) have given up one or both specialties, citing time constraints and politics as the dominant reasons. Duration of training was cited as the major barrier to entry by 77%. Increasing age and faculty rank and lack of a comparably trained institutional colleague were associated with attrition from dual-specialty practice. The majority (88%) reported that they would do it all again.

CONCLUSIONS

The current cohort of pediatric anesthesiologist-intensivists in the United States is a small but accomplished group of physicians. Efforts to train, recruit, and retain such providers must address systematic barriers to completion of the requisite training and continued practice.

摘要

背景

儿科麻醉学(PA)和儿科危重病医学(PCCM)的联合实践在历史上很常见,但随着时间的推移,这种联合实践明显减少。这种时间推移的原因尚不清楚,但现有证据表明,培训时间是当代受训者的障碍。在当前的从业者中,双重专业实践的限制也存在,目前原因尚不清楚。我们试图描述这一人群的人口统计学特征,调查他们对该领域的看法,并考虑导致人员流失的因素。

方法

我们对在美国从事儿科麻醉学和儿科危重病医学联合实践的医生进行了一项横断面、观察性研究。该调查以电子方式匿名分发给儿科麻醉学会(SPA)儿科麻醉领导委员会(PALC)的分发名单,指示收件人将链接转发给符合我们纳入标准的教员会议。参加级别受访者(n=62)完成了一份匿名的、包含 40 个问题的多领域调查。

结果

47 名男性和 15 名女性,中位数年龄为 51 岁,完成了调查。44%的人担任主要领导职务,55%的人是外部资助的研究员。少数(26%)人放弃了一个或两个专业,主要原因是时间限制和政治。77%的人表示,培训时间是进入该领域的主要障碍。年龄、教员级别增加以及缺乏受过同等培训的机构同事与双重专业实践的人员流失有关。大多数(88%)人表示他们会再做一次。

结论

美国目前的儿科麻醉师-重症监护医师群体是一群小而有成就的医生。必须努力培训、招募和留住这些提供者,以解决完成必要培训和持续实践的系统性障碍。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验