Department of Ultrasound, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, China.
Echocardiography. 2020 Aug;37(8):1243-1250. doi: 10.1111/echo.14792. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
The accuracy of real time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT-3DE) in evaluating left atrial volume (LAV) of heart transplant recipients against cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has not been reported. The aim of this study was to compare LAV with RT-3DE with respect to CMR in heart transplant recipients.
Thirty-one heart transplant recipients who received echocardiogram and CMR examination on the same day were prospectively enrolled. The maximal LAV, minimal LAV by RT-3DE, and two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) were compared with CMR measurements. Inter-technique comparisons included Pearson's correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. Reproducibility of 2DE and RT-3DE technique was assessed by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).
RT-3DE-derived LAV values showed higher correlation with CMR than 2DE measurements in heart transplant recipients (r = .93 vs r = .76 for maximal LAV; r = .91 vs r = .81 for minimal LAV). Two-dimensional echocardiography underestimated maximal LAV by 10 ± 31 mL and minimal LAV by 26 ± 26 mL. Although RT-3DE underestimated minimal LAV 15 ± 19 mL, no significant difference between RT-3DE and CMR was observed in maximal LAV (RT-3DE: 86 ± 22 mL; CMR: 89 ± 23 mL, P = .079), with a negligible bias of 3 mL. Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement were excellent for 2DE and RT-3DE parameters.
Compared with CMR reference, RT-3DE-derived LAV measurements are more accurate than 2DE-based analysis in heart transplant recipients, especially with regard to the assessment of maximal LAV. RT-3DE may be a valid alternative to CMR for quantification LAV in heart transplant recipients.
实时三维超声心动图(RT-3DE)评估心脏移植受者左心房容积(LAV)的准确性与心脏磁共振(CMR)相比尚未得到报道。本研究的目的是比较心脏移植受者的 LAV 与 RT-3DE 与 CMR 的关系。
前瞻性纳入 31 例同日接受超声心动图和 CMR 检查的心脏移植受者。比较 RT-3DE 的最大 LAV、最小 LAV 和二维超声心动图(2DE)与 CMR 测量值。技术间比较包括 Pearson 相关系数和 Bland-Altman 分析。采用组内相关系数(ICC)评估 2DE 和 RT-3DE 技术的可重复性。
RT-3DE 衍生的 LAV 值与 CMR 相比,在心脏移植受者中与 2DE 测量值相关性更高(最大 LAV 的 r 值分别为.93 和.76;最小 LAV 的 r 值分别为.91 和.81)。2DE 低估最大 LAV 10±31mL,低估最小 LAV 26±26mL。尽管 RT-3DE 低估最小 LAV 15±19mL,但最大 LAV 时 RT-3DE 与 CMR 之间无显著差异(RT-3DE:86±22mL;CMR:89±23mL,P=0.079),偏差可忽略不计为 3mL。2DE 和 RT-3DE 参数的观察者间和观察者内一致性均很好。
与 CMR 参考相比,RT-3DE 衍生的 LAV 测量值在心脏移植受者中比基于 2DE 的分析更准确,特别是在评估最大 LAV 时。RT-3DE 可能是心脏移植受者定量 LAV 的 CMR 有效替代方法。