Department of Family Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2020 Aug;22(8):1406-1414. doi: 10.1111/jch.13934. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
The association of different antihypertensive regimens with blood pressure (BP) control is not well-described among community-dwelling older adults with low comorbidity. We examined antihypertensive use and BP control in 10 062 treated hypertensives from Australia and the United States (US) using baseline data from the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) trial. Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) drugs were the most prevalently used antihypertensive in both countries (Australia: 81.7% of all regimens; US: 62.9% of all regimens; P < .001). Diuretics were the next most commonly used antihypertensive in both countries, but were more often included in regimens of US participants (48.9%, vs 33.3% of regimens in Australia; P < .001). Among all antihypertensive classes and possible combinations, monotherapy with a RAS drug was the most common regimen in both countries, but with higher prevalence in Australian than US participants (35.9% vs 20.9%; P < .001). For both monotherapy and combination users, BP control rates across age, ethnicity, and sex were consistently lower in Australian than US participants. After adjustment for age, sex, ethnicity, and BMI, significantly lower BP control rates remained in Australian compared to US participants for the most commonly used classes and regimens (RAS blocker monotherapy: BP control = 45.5% vs 54.2%; P = .002; diuretic monotherapy: BP control = 45.2% vs 64.5%; P = .001; and RAS blocker/diuretic combo: BP control = 50.2% vs 65.6%; P = .001). Our findings highlight variation in antihypertensive use in older adults treated for hypertension, with implications for BP control. Differences in BP control that were observed may be influenced, in part, by reasons other than choice of specific regimens.
在患有低合并症的社区居住的老年人群中,不同的降压方案与血压(BP)控制的关系尚未得到很好的描述。我们使用澳大利亚和美国(美国)ASPirin 降低老年人事件(ASPREE)试验的基线数据,检查了 10062 名接受治疗的高血压患者的降压药物使用情况和 BP 控制情况。肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)药物是两国最常用的降压药(澳大利亚:所有方案的 81.7%;美国:所有方案的 62.9%;P<.001)。利尿剂是两国最常用的下一类降压药,但在美国参与者的方案中更为常见(48.9%,而澳大利亚为 33.3%;P<.001)。在所有降压药类别和可能的组合中,RAS 药物单药治疗是两国最常见的方案,但在澳大利亚参与者中的比例更高(35.9%对美国参与者的 20.9%;P<.001)。对于单药治疗和联合用药者,澳大利亚参与者的年龄、种族和性别之间的 BP 控制率始终低于美国参与者。在调整年龄、性别、种族和 BMI 后,澳大利亚参与者的最常用类别和方案的 BP 控制率仍显著低于美国参与者(RAS 阻滞剂单药治疗:BP 控制=45.5%比 54.2%;P=.002;利尿剂单药治疗:BP 控制=45.2%比 64.5%;P=.001;和 RAS 阻滞剂/利尿剂联合治疗:BP 控制=50.2%比 65.6%;P=.001)。我们的研究结果强调了老年高血压患者降压药物使用的差异,这对 BP 控制有影响。观察到的 BP 控制差异可能部分受到选择特定方案以外的其他原因的影响。