Suppr超能文献

静脉药物滥用所致骨科后遗症对城市三级医疗中心的财务影响是什么?

What Is the Financial Impact of Orthopaedic Sequelae of Intravenous Drug Use on Urban Tertiary-care Centers?

机构信息

N. Dwivedi, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis/Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA.

M. A. Breslin, A. McDermott, S. Lin, H. A. Vallier, Department of Orthopaedics, the MetroHealth System, affiliated with Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Oct;478(10):2202-2212. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001330.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Orthopaedic sequelae such as skin and soft-tissue abscesses are frequent complications of intravenous drug use (IVDU) and comprise many of the most common indications for emergency room visits and hospitalizations within this population. Urban tertiary-care and safety-net hospitals frequently operate in challenging economic healthcare environments and are disproportionately tasked with providing care to this largely underinsured patient demographic. Although many public health initiatives have been instituted in recent years to understand the health impacts of IVDU and the spreading opioid epidemic, few efforts have been made to investigate its economic impact on healthcare systems. The inpatient treatment of orthopaedic sequelae of IVDU is a high-cost healthcare element that is critically important to understand within the current national context of inflationary healthcare costs.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What were the total healthcare costs incurred and total hospital reimbursements received in the treatment of extraspinal orthopaedic sequelae of IVDU? (2) What were the total healthcare costs incurred and total hospital reimbursements received in the treatment of spinal orthopaedic sequelae of IVDU? (3) How did patient insurance status effect the economic burden of orthopaedic sequelae of IVDU?

METHODS

An internal departmental record of all successive patients requiring inpatient treatment of orthopaedic sequelae of IVDU was initiated at Boston Medical Center (Boston, MA, USA) in 2012 and MetroHealth Medical Center (Cleveland, OH, USA) in 2015. A total of 412 patient admissions between 2012 to 2017 to these two safety-net hospitals (n = 236 and n = 176, respectively) for orthopaedic complications of IVDU were included in the study. These sequelae included cellulitis, cutaneous abscess, bursitis, myositis, tenosynovitis, septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, and epidural abscess. Patients were included if they were older than 18 years of age, presented to the emergency department for management of a musculoskeletal infection secondary to IVDU, and required inpatient orthopaedic treatment during their admission. Exclusion criteria included all patients presenting with a musculoskeletal infection not directly secondary to active IVDU. Patients presenting with an epidural abscess (Boston Medical Center, n = 36) were evaluated separately to explore potential differences in costs within this subgroup. A robust retrospective financial analysis was performed using internal financial databases at each institution which directly enumerated all true hospital costs associated with each patient admission, independent of billed hospital charges. All direct, indirect, variable, and fixed hospital costs were individually summed for each hospitalization, constituting a true "bottom-up" micro-costing approach. Labor-based costs were calculated through use of time-based costing; for instance, the cost of nursing labor care associated with a patient admission was determined through ascription of the median hospital cost of a registered nurse within that department (that is, compensation for salary plus benefits) to the total length of nursing time needed by that patient during their hospitalization. Primary reimbursements reflected the true monetary value received by the study institutions from insurers and were determined through the total adjusted payment for each inpatient admission. All professional fees were excluded. A secondary analysis was performed to assess the effect of patient insurance status on hospital costs and reimbursements for each patient admission.

RESULTS

The mean healthcare cost incurred for the treatment of extraspinal orthopaedic sequelae of IVDU was USD 9524 ± USD 1430 per patient admission. The mean hospital reimbursement provided for the treatment of these extraspinal sequelae was USD 7678 ± USD 1248 per patient admission. This resulted in a mean financial loss of USD 1846 ± USD 1342 per patient admission. The mean healthcare cost incurred at Boston Medical Center for the treatment of epidural abscesses secondary to IVDU was USD 44,357 ± USD 7384 per patient. Hospital reimbursements within this subgroup were highly dependent upon insurance status. The median (range) reimbursement provided for patients possessing a unique hospital-based nonprofit health plan (n = 4) was USD 103,016 (USD 9022 to USD 320,123), corresponding to a median financial gain of USD 24,904 (USD 2289 to USD 83,079). However, the mean reimbursement for all other patients presenting with epidural abscesses (n = 32) was USD 30,429 ± USD 5278, corresponding to a mean financial loss of USD 5768 ± USD 4861. A secondary analysis demonstrated that treatment of extraspinal orthopaedic sequelae of IVDU for patients possessing Medicaid insurance (n = 309) resulted in a financial loss of USD 2813 ± USD 1593 per patient admission. Conversely, treatment of extraspinal orthopaedic sequelae for patients possessing non-Medicaid insurance (n = 67) generated a mean financial gain of USD 2615 ± USD 1341 per patient admission.

CONCLUSIONS

Even when excluding all professional fees, the inpatient treatment of orthopaedic sequelae of IVDU resulted in substantial financial losses driven primarily by high proportions of under- and uninsured people within this patient population. These financial losses may be unsustainable for medical centers operating in challenging economic healthcare landscapes. The development of novel initiatives and support of existing programs aimed at mitigating the health-related and economic impact of IVDU must remain a principal priority of healthcare providers and policymakers in coming years. Advocacy for the expansion of Medicaid accountable care organizations and national syringe service programs (SSPs), and the development of specialized outpatient wound and abscess clinics at healthcare centers may help to substantially alleviate the economic burden of the orthopaedic sequelae of IVDU.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level, IV, economic and decision analyses.

摘要

背景

静脉注射药物滥用(IVDU)后的皮肤和软组织脓肿等骨科后遗症是常见并发症,也是此类人群中最常见的急诊室就诊和住院的主要原因。城市三级保健和医疗保障医院经常在具有挑战性的经济医疗环境中运作,并且承担着为这一大部分未参保患者提供护理的不成比例的任务。尽管近年来为了了解 IVDU 的健康影响和蔓延的阿片类药物流行,已经实施了许多公共卫生措施,但很少有人努力调查其对医疗系统的经济影响。IVDU 骨科后遗症的住院治疗是一个高成本的医疗保健元素,在当前通胀医疗成本的国家背景下,这一点至关重要。

问题/目的:(1)治疗 IVDU 骨科后遗症的总医疗费用和总医院报销费用是多少?(2)治疗 IVDU 脊柱骨科后遗症的总医疗费用和总医院报销费用是多少?(3)患者的保险状况如何影响 IVDU 骨科后遗症的经济负担?

方法

波士顿医疗中心(美国马萨诸塞州波士顿)于 2012 年和克利夫兰的 MetroHealth 医疗中心(美国俄亥俄州克利夫兰)于 2015 年启动了一项连续收治 IVDU 骨科后遗症患者的内部部门记录。2012 年至 2017 年期间,这两家医疗保障医院共收治了 412 名骨科并发症患者(n = 236 和 n = 176),这些患者均因 IVDU 导致的肌肉骨骼感染而接受了住院治疗。这些后遗症包括蜂窝织炎、皮肤脓肿、滑囊炎、肌炎、腱鞘炎、化脓性关节炎、骨髓炎和硬膜外脓肿。纳入标准为年龄大于 18 岁,因 IVDU 导致的肌肉骨骼感染而到急诊就诊,并在住院期间需要接受骨科治疗的患者。排除标准包括所有因非 IVDU 直接引起的肌肉骨骼感染的患者。波士顿医疗中心的 36 名硬膜外脓肿患者被单独评估,以探讨该亚组中成本的潜在差异。在每个机构内部使用财务数据库进行了稳健的回顾性财务分析,直接列举了与每位患者入院相关的所有真实医院费用,而不考虑计费的医院费用。对每次住院的所有直接、间接、可变和固定医院费用进行单独汇总,构成了一种真正的“自下而上”微观成本核算方法。劳动力成本通过使用基于时间的成本核算来计算;例如,患者住院期间所需的护理劳动成本是通过将该部门注册护士的中位医院成本(即工资加福利的补偿)分配给该患者的总护理时间来确定的。主要报销反映了研究机构从保险公司获得的真实货币价值,是通过对每位住院患者的总调整报销金额来确定的。所有专业费用均被排除在外。进行了二次分析,以评估患者保险状况对每位患者入院的医院费用和报销的影响。

结果

治疗 IVDU 脊柱骨科后遗症的平均医疗费用为每位患者 9524 美元(SD ± 1430 美元)。治疗这些脊柱后遗症的平均医院报销额为每位患者 7678 美元(SD ± 1248 美元)。这导致每位患者的平均财务损失为 1846 美元(SD ± 1342 美元)。波士顿医疗中心治疗 IVDU 引起的硬膜外脓肿的平均医疗费用为每位患者 44357 美元(SD ± 7384 美元)。该亚组中的医院报销额高度依赖于保险状况。拥有独特医院非营利性健康计划的 4 名患者的中位(范围)报销额为 103016 美元(9022 美元至 320123 美元),对应中位数财务收益为 24904 美元(2289 美元至 83079 美元)。然而,所有其他患有硬膜外脓肿的患者(n = 32)的平均报销额为 30429 美元(SD ± 5278),对应平均财务损失 5768 美元(SD ± 4861)。二次分析表明,拥有医疗补助保险的患者(n = 309)治疗 IVDU 脊柱骨科后遗症的财务损失为每位患者 2813 美元(SD ± 1593)。相反,拥有非医疗补助保险的患者(n = 67)治疗 IVDU 脊柱骨科后遗症的平均财务收益为每位患者 2615 美元(SD ± 1341)。

结论

即使不包括所有专业费用,IVDU 骨科后遗症的住院治疗也会导致巨大的财务损失,主要原因是此类患者群体中未参保和低参保人数比例较高。对于在具有挑战性的经济医疗环境中运作的医疗中心来说,这些财务损失可能是不可持续的。医疗保健提供者和政策制定者在未来几年仍需将减轻 IVDU 的健康和经济影响的新计划和现有计划的支持作为主要优先事项。倡导扩大医疗补助管理式医疗组织和国家注射器服务计划(SSP),并在医疗中心发展专门的门诊伤口和脓肿诊所,可能有助于显著减轻 IVDU 骨科后遗症的经济负担。

证据水平

IV 级,经济和决策分析。

相似文献

4
Economic Burden of Inpatient Admission of Ankle Fractures.踝关节骨折住院治疗的经济负担
Foot Ankle Int. 2017 Sep;38(9):997-1004. doi: 10.1177/1071100717709576. Epub 2017 Jun 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Medicaid Reimbursement for Common Orthopedic Procedures Is Not Consistent.医疗补助对常见骨科手术的报销并不一致。
Orthopedics. 2019 Mar 1;42(2):e193-e196. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20181227-06. Epub 2019 Jan 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验