Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
J Psychopharmacol. 2020 Oct;34(10):1105-1111. doi: 10.1177/0269881120936509. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
The therapeutic reference range for venlafaxine in antidepressant treatment has been defined as 100 to 400 ng/mL. However, in an everyday setting active moiety concentrations above the therapeutic reference range were often reported.
The aim of this study was to re-evaluate the therapeutic reference range of venlafaxine.
In-patients (⩽60 years) with major depressive episodes receiving antidepressant monotherapy with venlafaxine during routine clinical treatment were included in this observational study. Depressive symptom severity was evaluated on a weekly basis using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-21), and therapeutic drug monitoring analyses were performed. Resting electrocardiograms were analyzed in week 3, week 5 and week 7 of study participation.
Clinical improvement from baseline to week 4 was significantly associated with increasing serum concentrations of the active moiety of venlafaxine ( = 23, Pearson correlation, = 0.009), but not with the dose of venlafaxine. Patients achieving remission showed significantly higher serum concentrations than patients achieving response/non-response (Kruskal-Wallis test, = 0.019). Moreover, in patients with serum concentrations above 400 ng/mL time to remission and time to response was significantly shorter than in patients with concentrations below 400 ng/mL (Mantel-COX test, = 0.001; = 0.010). QTc time was below the upper limit of a normal QTc time (450 ms) for all patients.
The serum concentration of the active moiety and not the dose determined the effect of venlafaxine. Shorter remission times without ECG alterations in patients with serum concentrations above the therapeutic reference range suggest a re-evaluation of the therapeutic reference range for venlafaxine in larger studies.
文拉法辛在抗抑郁治疗中的治疗参考范围已被定义为 100 至 400ng/ml。然而,在日常环境中,经常报告活性成分浓度高于治疗参考范围。
本研究旨在重新评估文拉法辛的治疗参考范围。
本观察性研究纳入了在常规临床治疗中接受文拉法辛单药治疗的有主要抑郁发作的住院患者。使用汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAMD-21)每周评估抑郁症状严重程度,并进行治疗药物监测分析。在研究参与的第 3、5 和 7 周分析静息心电图。
从基线到第 4 周的临床改善与文拉法辛活性成分血清浓度的增加显著相关(=23,皮尔逊相关,=0.009),但与文拉法辛剂量无关。达到缓解的患者的血清浓度明显高于达到反应/无反应的患者(Kruskal-Wallis 检验,=0.019)。此外,在血清浓度高于 400ng/ml 的患者中,缓解时间和反应时间明显短于血清浓度低于 400ng/ml 的患者(Mantel-COX 检验,=0.001;=0.010)。所有患者的 QTc 时间均低于正常 QTc 时间(450ms)上限。
活性成分的血清浓度而不是剂量决定了文拉法辛的疗效。在血清浓度高于治疗参考范围的患者中,缓解时间更短且心电图无改变,提示在更大规模的研究中重新评估文拉法辛的治疗参考范围。