Suppr超能文献

磁性括约肌增强扩张术的安全性与有效性。

Safety and efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation dilation.

作者信息

Fletcher Reid, Dunst Christy M, Abdelmoaty Walaa F, Alicuben Evan T, Shemmeri Ealaf, Parker Brett, Müller Dolores, Sharata Ahmed M, Reavis Kevin M, Davila Bradley Daniel, Bildzukewicz Nikolai A, Louie Brian E, Lipham John C, DeMeester Steven R

机构信息

Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA.

The Oregon Clinic: Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery Division, 4805 NE Glisan Ave, Portland, OR, 97213, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2021 Jul;35(7):3861-3864. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07799-8. Epub 2020 Jul 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The magnetic sphincter augmentation device (MSA) provides effective relief of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. Dysphagia after MSA implantation sometimes prompts endoscopic dilation. The manufacturer's instructions are that it be performed 6 or more weeks after implantation under fluoroscopic guidance to not more than 15 mm keeping 3 or more beads closed. The purpose of this study was to assess adherence to these recommendations and explore the techniques used and outcomes after MSA dilation.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

We conducted a multicenter retrospective review of patients undergoing dilation for dysphagia after MSA placement from 2012 to 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 144 patients underwent 245 dilations. The median size of MSA placed was 14 beads (range 12-17) and the median time to dilation was 175 days. A second dilation was performed in 67 patients, 22 patients had a third dilation and 7 patients underwent 4 or more dilations. In total, 17 devices (11.8%) were eventually explanted. The majority of dilations were performed with a balloon dilator (81%). The median dilator size was 18 mm and 73.4% were done with a dilator larger than 15 mm. There was no association between dilator size and need for subsequent dilation. Fluoroscopy was used in 28% of cases. There were no perforations or device erosions related to dilation.

DISCUSSION

There is no clinical credence to the manufacturer's recommendation for the use of fluoroscopy and limitation to 15 mm when dilating a patient for dysphagia after MSA implantation. Use of a larger size dilator was not associated with perforation or device erosion, but also did not reduce the need for repeat dilation. Given this, we would recommend that the initial dilation for any size MSA device be done using a 15 mm through-the-scope balloon dilator. Dysphagia prompting dilation after MSA implantation is associated with nearly a 12% risk of device explantation.

摘要

背景

磁括约肌增强装置(MSA)可有效缓解胃食管反流症状。MSA植入后出现的吞咽困难有时需要进行内镜扩张。制造商的说明是,在植入后6周或更长时间,在荧光镜引导下进行扩张,扩张不超过15毫米,保持3颗或更多珠子闭合。本研究的目的是评估对这些建议的依从性,并探讨MSA扩张所使用的技术和结果。

方法和程序

我们对2012年至2018年因MSA植入后吞咽困难而接受扩张的患者进行了多中心回顾性研究。

结果

共有144例患者接受了245次扩张。所植入MSA的中位数尺寸为14颗珠子(范围12 - 17),扩张的中位时间为175天。67例患者进行了第二次扩张,22例患者进行了第三次扩张,7例患者进行了4次或更多次扩张。共有17个装置(11.8%)最终被取出。大多数扩张是使用球囊扩张器进行的(81%)。扩张器的中位尺寸为18毫米,73.4%的扩张使用了大于15毫米的扩张器。扩张器尺寸与后续扩张需求之间没有关联。28%的病例使用了荧光镜检查。没有与扩张相关的穿孔或装置侵蚀。

讨论

对于MSA植入后因吞咽困难而进行扩张的患者,制造商关于使用荧光镜检查和限制在15毫米的建议没有临床依据。使用较大尺寸的扩张器与穿孔或装置侵蚀无关,但也没有减少重复扩张的需求。鉴于此,我们建议对于任何尺寸的MSA装置,初始扩张应使用15毫米的经内镜球囊扩张器。MSA植入后因吞咽困难而进行扩张与近12%的装置取出风险相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验