Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Ophthalmology, Sapporo City General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2018 Sep-Oct;1(2):123-131. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
To investigate the usefulness of waveform parameters measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer (Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Depew, NY) in assessing the progression of glaucomatous visual field (VF).
Observational cross-sectional study.
One hundred and one eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma in 68 patients with 8 reliable VFs using the Humphrey Field Analyzer (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA).
The mean of total deviation (mTD) value of the 52 test points in the 24-2 Humphrey Field Analyzer VF test pattern was calculated, and the progression rate of mTD was determined using 8 VFs. Ocular Response Analyzer measurement was performed 3 times in the same day, and the average values of the 3 measurements were used in the analysis. Then, the optimal linear mixed model was selected using 7 parameters: age, mean and standard deviation of intraocular pressure with the Goldmann applanation tonometry during the observation period, central corneal thickness, axial length, mTD in the initial VF, and corneal hysteresis (CH) other than waveform parameters, henceforth known as the basic model. In addition, using the 37 waveform parameters, the optimal model for the mTD progression rate was identified, according to the second-order bias-corrected Akaike information criterion (AICc) index, using 15 preselected waveform parameters with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (henceforth known as the waveform model).
Optimal linear mixed models for the mTD progression rate, as determined by AICc index.
The mean ± standard deviation mTD progression rate was -0.25±0.31 dB/year. The basic model was mTD progression rate = -0.94 + 0.075 × CH (AICc = 46.71). The waveform model was mTD progression rate = 1.25 - 0.066 × path2 - 0.000099 × p2area + 0.0021 × mslew2 (AICc = 44.95). The relative likelihood of the latter model being the optimal model was 6.23 times greater than that of the former model.
Ocular Response Analyzer waveform parameters were correlated significantly with glaucomatous VF progression and showed a stronger than correlation with VF progression than CH.
探讨利用眼反应分析仪(美国 Reichert 眼科仪器公司,Depew,NY)测量的波形参数评估青光眼视野(VF)进展的有用性。
观察性横断面研究。
68 例原发性开角型青光眼患者的 101 只眼,8 只眼的视野检查结果可靠,采用 Humphrey 视野分析仪(美国卡尔蔡司公司,都柏林,CA)。
计算 24-2 Humphrey 视野分析仪 VF 测试模式中 52 个测试点的总偏差(mTD)值的平均值,并使用 8 个视野确定 mTD 的进展率。在同一天内进行 3 次眼反应分析仪测量,分析时使用 3 次测量的平均值。然后,使用 7 个参数(观察期间 Goldmann 压平眼压的平均值和标准差、中央角膜厚度、眼轴长度、初始 VF 中的 mTD、除波形参数以外的角膜滞后率)选择最佳线性混合模型,该模型称为基本模型。此外,根据二阶偏置校正赤池信息量准则(AICc)指数,使用 15 个预先选择的、具有最小绝对值收缩和选择算子回归的波形参数(下文称为波形模型),确定用于 mTD 进展率的最佳模型。
根据 AICc 指数确定 mTD 进展率的最佳线性混合模型。
平均±标准偏差 mTD 进展率为-0.25±0.31 dB/年。基本模型为 mTD 进展率=-0.94+0.075×CH(AICc=46.71)。波形模型为 mTD 进展率=1.25-0.066×path2-0.000099×p2area+0.0021×mslew2(AICc=44.95)。后者模型作为最优模型的相对可能性是前者模型的 6.23 倍。
眼反应分析仪的波形参数与青光眼 VF 进展显著相关,与 VF 进展的相关性强于角膜滞后率。