Suppr超能文献

最小临床重要差异在随机临床试验中的报告。

Minimal Clinically Important Difference Reporting in Randomized Clinical Trials.

机构信息

Clinical Outcomes Research Office, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.

Meharry Medical College School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.

出版信息

JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Sep 1;146(9):862-863. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.1586.

Abstract

This review evaluates the reporting and definition of minimal clinically important differences in randomized clinical trials.

摘要

本文回顾评估了随机临床试验中最小临床重要差异的报告和定义。

相似文献

1
Minimal Clinically Important Difference Reporting in Randomized Clinical Trials.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Sep 1;146(9):862-863. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.1586.
4
Reporting of Clinical Trial Interventions Published in Leading Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Journals.
Laryngoscope. 2020 Sep;130(9):E507-E514. doi: 10.1002/lary.28404. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
5
Most ankle sprain research is either false or clinically unimportant: A 30-year audit of randomized controlled trials.
J Sport Health Sci. 2021 Sep;10(5):523-529. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.11.002. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
6
Recent randomized controlled trials in otolaryngology.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Mar;152(3):418-23. doi: 10.1177/0194599814563518. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
7
Quality of reporting in randomized trials.
Ear Nose Throat J. 2010 Apr;89(4):150.
8
Reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in otolaryngology: review of adherence to the CONSORT statement.
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 May 15;47(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40463-018-0277-8.
9
Randomized controlled trials in otolaryngology journals.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Oct;137(4):539-44. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.07.018.
10
Two Minimal Clinically Important Difference (2MCID): A New Twist on an Old Concept.
Acta Derm Venereol. 2018 Jul 11;98(7):715-717. doi: 10.2340/00015555-2894.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond statistical significance: Embracing minimal clinically important difference for better patient care.
World J Methodol. 2025 Mar 20;15(1):97814. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i1.97814.
3
Cognitive prehabilitation for older adults undergoing elective surgery: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2024 Oct 4;16:1474504. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1474504. eCollection 2024.
4
Distinguishing Clinical From Statistical Significances in Contemporary Comparative Effectiveness Research.
Ann Surg. 2024 Jun 1;279(6):907-912. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006250. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
5
Null regions: a unified conceptual framework for statistical inference.
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Nov 22;10(11):221328. doi: 10.1098/rsos.221328. eCollection 2023 Nov.
6
Comment on The Unbearable Lightness of Difference Between Statistical and Clinical Significance.
Ann Surg Open. 2022 Jan 3;3(1):e114. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000122. eCollection 2022 Mar.
9
Most-Cited Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Within Otolaryngology-Revisiting the Minimal Clinically Important Difference: A Review.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Mar 1;149(3):261-276. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.4703.
10
What is the minimal clinically important difference, and why does it matter?
J Bras Pneumol. 2021 Jul 12;47(3):e20210217. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20210217.

本文引用的文献

1
Importance of Defining and Interpreting a Clinically Meaningful Difference in Clinical Research.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Feb 1;146(2):101-102. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.3744.
2
Use of Confidence Intervals to Improve the Quality of Research Results Reporting and Interpretation.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Jun 1;145(6):491-493. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.0793.
3
Minimal clinically important difference: defining what really matters to patients.
JAMA. 2014 Oct 1;312(13):1342-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.13128.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验