Suppr超能文献

耳鼻喉科学中引用最多的患者报告结局测量指标:重新审视最小临床重要差异:综述。

Most-Cited Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Within Otolaryngology-Revisiting the Minimal Clinically Important Difference: A Review.

机构信息

Clinical Outcomes Research Office, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.

出版信息

JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Mar 1;149(3):261-276. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.4703.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) allow clinicians and researchers to assess health-related information from a patient's perspective. These measures have been used more frequently over the last several decades, but an associated minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is needed to optimize their utility. This narrative review identified the top 100 most-cited otolaryngology-related PROM development and validation publications and assessed the presence and characteristics of the PROMs' associated MCID.

OBSERVATIONS

In this narrative review, a literature search in Scopus and Web of Science was conducted on June 29, 2022, using keywords related to PROM development and validation studies in otolaryngology and reference lists. Studies that met the definition of a PROM and assessed an otolaryngologic disorder or study population were included for full-text review. After full-text review of 188 articles, the top 100 most-cited PROM development and validation publications, resulting in 106 total PROMs, were chosen for review. A total of 39 (37%) of the identified PROMs had an associated MCID. Of those reporting an MCID, 14 (35.9%) used an anchor-based method, 12 (30.8%) used a distribution-based method, 10 (25.6%) used both, and 3 (7.7%) did not specify or used neither method. Rhinology had the greatest number of PROMs with an associated MCID (16 of 24, 66%), and pediatrics had the fewest (1 of 13, 7.7%). The median number of citations of PROMs with an MCID was higher than those without an MCID.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The majority of the most-cited PROMs in otolaryngology lack an associated MCID. These data indicated that there are a multitude of PROMs that have been cited hundreds of times and used for decades without the ability to identify whether a particular change in score on the instrument is clinically meaningful. There is a need to determine and validate MCIDs for commonly used PROMs to aid clinical research and trial interpretation.

摘要

重要性

患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)使临床医生和研究人员能够从患者的角度评估与健康相关的信息。这些措施在过去几十年中被越来越多地使用,但需要一个相关的最小临床重要差异(MCID)来优化其效用。本叙述性综述确定了前 100 项最常被引用的耳鼻喉科相关 PROM 开发和验证出版物,并评估了这些 PROM 相关 MCID 的存在和特征。

观察结果

在本叙述性综述中,于 2022 年 6 月 29 日在 Scopus 和 Web of Science 中进行了与耳鼻喉科 PROM 开发和验证研究相关的关键词文献检索,并查阅了参考文献列表。纳入符合 PROM 定义并评估耳鼻喉科疾病或研究人群的研究进行全文审查。在对 188 篇文章进行全文审查后,选择了前 100 项最常被引用的 PROM 开发和验证出版物,共涉及 106 种 PROM 进行审查。总共 39 种(37%)确定的 PROM 具有相关的 MCID。在报告 MCID 的研究中,14 项(35.9%)使用了基于锚定的方法,12 项(30.8%)使用了基于分布的方法,10 项(25.6%)同时使用了这两种方法,3 项(7.7%)未指定或未使用这两种方法。鼻科学拥有最多与 MCID 相关的 PROM(24 个中的 16 个,66%),儿科则最少(13 个中的 1 个,7.7%)。具有 MCID 的 PROM 的平均引用次数高于没有 MCID 的 PROM。

结论和相关性

耳鼻喉科最常被引用的 PROM 中,大多数都没有相关的 MCID。这些数据表明,有大量的 PROM 被引用了数百次,并且已经使用了几十年,而无法确定仪器上特定分数的变化是否具有临床意义。需要确定和验证常用 PROM 的 MCID,以帮助临床研究和试验解释。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验