Suppr超能文献

不同跑步水平的鞋款特征推荐:德尔菲研究。

Shoe feature recommendations for different running levels: A Delphi study.

机构信息

Human Performance Laboratory, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Institue of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Jul 16;15(7):e0236047. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236047. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Providing runners with footwear that match their functional needs has the potential to improve footwear comfort, enhance running performance and reduce the risk of overuse injuries. It is currently not known how footwear experts make decisions about different shoe features and their properties for runners of different levels. We performed a Delphi study in order to understand: 1) definitions of different runner levels, 2) which footwear features are considered important and 3) how these features should be prescribed for runners of different levels. Experienced academics, journalists, coaches, bloggers and physicians that examine the effects of footwear on running were recruited to participate in three rounds of a Delphi study. Three runner level definitions were refined throughout this study based on expert feedback. Experts were also provided a list of 20 different footwear features. They were asked which features were important and what the properties of those features should be. Twenty-four experts, most with 10+ years of experience, completed all three rounds of this study. These experts came to a consensus for the characteristics of three different running levels. They indicated that 12 of the 20 footwear features initially proposed were important for footwear design. Of these 12 features, experts came to a consensus on how to apply five footwear feature properties for all three different running levels. These features were: upper breathability, forefoot bending stiffness, heel-to-toe drop, torsional bending stiffness and crash pad. Interestingly, the experts were not able to come to a consensus on one of the most researched footwear features, rearfoot midsole hardness. These recommendations can provide a starting point for further biomechanical studies, especially for features that are considered as important, but have not yet been examined experimentally.

摘要

为跑步者提供符合其功能需求的鞋类产品有可能提高鞋类舒适度,提高跑步表现并降低过度使用损伤的风险。目前尚不清楚鞋类专家如何针对不同水平的跑步者的不同鞋类特征及其属性做出决策。我们进行了一项 Delphi 研究,以了解:1)不同跑步者水平的定义,2)哪些鞋类特征被认为是重要的,以及 3)如何为不同水平的跑步者规定这些特征。我们招募了经验丰富的学者、记者、教练、博客作者和研究鞋类对跑步影响的医生,让他们参与了三轮 Delphi 研究。在整个研究过程中,基于专家反馈,对三种跑步者水平定义进行了细化。专家还收到了一份包含 20 种不同鞋类特征的清单。他们被要求指出哪些特征是重要的,以及这些特征的属性应该是什么。24 名专家,其中大多数具有 10 年以上的经验,完成了这项研究的所有三轮。这些专家就三种不同跑步水平的特征达成了共识。他们指出,最初提出的 20 种鞋类特征中有 12 种对于鞋类设计很重要。在这 12 个特征中,专家就如何为所有三种不同的跑步水平应用五个鞋类特征属性达成了共识。这些特征是:鞋面透气性、前脚掌弯曲刚度、脚跟到脚尖的落差、扭转弯曲刚度和减震垫。有趣的是,专家们无法就最受研究的鞋类特征之一——后脚跟中底硬度达成共识。这些建议可以为进一步的生物力学研究提供一个起点,特别是对于那些被认为很重要但尚未经过实验检验的特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1598/7365446/3f17545320b2/pone.0236047.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验