• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与非化学加硅胶方法相比,对一种非化学臭虫治理方法的评估

Evaluation of a Non-Chemical Compared to a Non-Chemical Plus Silica Gel Approach to Bed Bug Management.

作者信息

Abbar Salehe, Wang Changlu, Cooper Richard

机构信息

Department of Entomology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.

出版信息

Insects. 2020 Jul 14;11(7):443. doi: 10.3390/insects11070443.

DOI:10.3390/insects11070443
PMID:32674408
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7411924/
Abstract

Bed bug resistance to commonly used pesticide sprays has led to exploring new pesticides and other strategies for bed bug management. Non-chemical methods are effective in bed bug management; however, they do not provide residual protection. Compared to insecticide sprays, dust formulations are considered to provide longer residual control. We evaluated two bed bug management programs in apartment buildings. A building-wide inspection was initially conducted to identify bed bug infested apartments. Selected apartments were divided into two treatment groups: non-chemical plus silica gel dust treatment (10 apartments) and non-chemical treatment (11 apartments). After initial treatment, apartments were re-visited monthly for up to 6 months. During each visit, the total bed bug count per apartment was obtained by examining interceptor traps placed in the apartments and conducting a visual inspection. Mean bed bug count was reduced by 99% and 89% in non-chemical plus silica gel dust and non-chemical treatment, respectively. Non-chemical plus silica gel dust treatment caused significantly higher bed bug count reduction than the non-chemical treatment at 6 months. Bed bugs were eradicated from 40% and 36% of apartments treated with non-chemical plus silica gel dust treatment and non-chemical treatment, respectively.

摘要

臭虫对常用杀虫剂喷雾产生抗性,促使人们探索新的杀虫剂及其他臭虫治理策略。非化学方法在臭虫治理中有效;然而,它们无法提供残留防护。与杀虫剂喷雾相比,粉尘制剂被认为能提供更长时间的残留防治效果。我们在公寓楼中评估了两种臭虫治理方案。首先进行全楼检查,以确定有臭虫侵扰的公寓。选定的公寓被分为两个处理组:非化学方法加硅胶粉尘处理组(10套公寓)和非化学方法处理组(11套公寓)。初次处理后,每月对公寓进行复查,为期长达6个月。每次复查时,通过检查放置在公寓内的拦截器陷阱并进行目视检查,统计每套公寓内臭虫的总数。非化学方法加硅胶粉尘处理组和非化学方法处理组的臭虫平均数量分别减少了99%和89%。在6个月时,非化学方法加硅胶粉尘处理组导致的臭虫数量减少幅度显著高于非化学方法处理组。分别有40%和36%接受非化学方法加硅胶粉尘处理和非化学方法处理的公寓内臭虫被根除。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c3b/7411924/bbf388e6c9f6/insects-11-00443-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c3b/7411924/bbf388e6c9f6/insects-11-00443-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c3b/7411924/bbf388e6c9f6/insects-11-00443-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a Non-Chemical Compared to a Non-Chemical Plus Silica Gel Approach to Bed Bug Management.与非化学加硅胶方法相比,对一种非化学臭虫治理方法的评估
Insects. 2020 Jul 14;11(7):443. doi: 10.3390/insects11070443.
2
Testing a Threshold-Based Bed Bug Management Approach in Apartment Buildings.在公寓楼中测试基于阈值的臭虫管理方法。
Insects. 2017 Jul 26;8(3):76. doi: 10.3390/insects8030076.
3
Comparison of Three Bed Bug Management Strategies in a Low-Income Apartment Building.低收入公寓楼中三种臭虫管理策略的比较
Insects. 2012 Apr 2;3(2):402-9. doi: 10.3390/insects3020402.
4
Evaluation of two least toxic integrated pest management programs for managing bed bugs (Heteroptera: Cimicidae) with discussion of a bed bug intercepting device.评估两种毒性最低的综合虫害管理方案对臭虫(半翅目:臭虫科)的防治效果,并讨论一种臭虫拦截装置。
J Med Entomol. 2009 May;46(3):566-71. doi: 10.1603/033.046.0322.
5
Evaluation of an insecticide dust band treatment method for controlling bed bugs.评价一种杀虫剂粉尘带处理方法控制臭虫。
J Econ Entomol. 2013 Feb;106(1):347-52. doi: 10.1603/ec12259.
6
Effectiveness of a Reduced-Risk Insecticide Based Bed Bug Management Program in Low-Income Housing.基于低风险杀虫剂的臭虫管理计划在低收入住房中的有效性。
Insects. 2013 Nov 28;4(4):731-42. doi: 10.3390/insects4040731.
7
Evaluation of a model community-wide bed bug management program in affordable housing.经济适用房中社区范围内臭虫综合管理计划的评估
Pest Manag Sci. 2016 Jan;72(1):45-56. doi: 10.1002/ps.3982. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
8
Efficacy of an Essential Oil-Based Pesticide for Controlling Bed Bug (Cimex lectularius) Infestations in Apartment Buildings.一种基于精油的杀虫剂对控制公寓楼臭虫(温带臭虫)侵扰的效果。
Insects. 2014 Nov 5;5(4):849-59. doi: 10.3390/insects5040849.
9
Comparative Efficacy of Selected Dust Insecticides for Controlling Cimex lectularius (Hemiptera: Cimicidae).几种灭尘杀虫剂对臭虫(半翅目:臭虫科)的防治效果比较
J Econ Entomol. 2016 Aug;109(4):1819-26. doi: 10.1093/jee/tow129. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
10
Field Study of the Comparative Efficacy of Three Pyrethroid/Neonicotinoid Mixture Products for the Control of the Common Bed Bug, Cimex lectularius.三种拟除虫菊酯/新烟碱类混合产品防治温带臭虫(Cimex lectularius)效果比较的田间研究
Insects. 2015 Mar 18;6(1):197-205. doi: 10.3390/insects6010197.

引用本文的文献

1
Laboratory Evaluation of a Novel Insecticide, Isocycloseram, Against the Common Bed Bug ( L.) (Hemiptera: Cimicidae).新型杀虫剂异环丝胺对常见臭虫(Cimex lectularius L.)(半翅目:臭虫科)的实验室评估
Insects. 2025 Feb 12;16(2):200. doi: 10.3390/insects16020200.
2
Insecticide Resistance of L. Populations and the Performance of Selected Neonicotinoid-Pyrethroid Mixture Sprays and an Inorganic Dust.小菜蛾种群的杀虫剂抗性以及所选新烟碱类-拟除虫菊酯类混合喷雾剂和一种无机粉剂的性能
Insects. 2023 Jan 27;14(2):133. doi: 10.3390/insects14020133.

本文引用的文献

1
Testing a Threshold-Based Bed Bug Management Approach in Apartment Buildings.在公寓楼中测试基于阈值的臭虫管理方法。
Insects. 2017 Jul 26;8(3):76. doi: 10.3390/insects8030076.
2
Behavioral Responses of the Common Bed Bug, Cimex lectularius, to Insecticide Dusts.温带臭虫(Cimex lectularius)对杀虫剂粉尘的行为反应
Insects. 2017 Aug 8;8(3):83. doi: 10.3390/insects8030083.
3
Desiccant dust and the use of CO gas as a mobility stimulant for bed bugs: a potential control solution?干燥剂粉尘以及使用一氧化碳气体作为臭虫的移动刺激剂:一种潜在的控制解决方案?
J Pest Sci (2004). 2017;90(1):249-259. doi: 10.1007/s10340-016-0784-1. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
4
Evidence of Tolerance to Silica-Based Desiccant Dusts in a Pyrethroid-Resistant Strain of Cimex lectularius (Hemiptera: Cimicidae).在拟除虫菊酯抗性臭虫品系(半翅目:臭虫科)中对二氧化硅基干燥剂粉尘耐受性的证据
Insects. 2016 Dec 9;7(4):74. doi: 10.3390/insects7040074.
5
Comparative Efficacy of Selected Dust Insecticides for Controlling Cimex lectularius (Hemiptera: Cimicidae).几种灭尘杀虫剂对臭虫(半翅目:臭虫科)的防治效果比较
J Econ Entomol. 2016 Aug;109(4):1819-26. doi: 10.1093/jee/tow129. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
6
Bed Bugs: Prevalence in Low-Income Communities, Resident's Reactions, and Implementation of a Low-Cost Inspection Protocol.臭虫:低收入社区的流行情况、居民反应及低成本检查方案的实施
J Med Entomol. 2016 May;53(3):639-646. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjw018. Epub 2016 Apr 5.
7
Effects of Various Interventions, Including Mass Trapping with Passive Pitfall Traps, on Low-Level Bed Bug Populations in Apartments.包括使用被动陷阱诱捕在内的各种干预措施对公寓中低水平臭虫种群的影响。
J Econ Entomol. 2016 Apr;109(2):762-9. doi: 10.1093/jee/tov337.
8
Potential of Essential Oil-Based Pesticides and Detergents for Bed Bug Control.基于精油的杀虫剂和洗涤剂用于控制臭虫的潜力。
J Econ Entomol. 2014 Dec;107(6):2163-70. doi: 10.1603/EC14328.
9
Comparison of Three Bed Bug Management Strategies in a Low-Income Apartment Building.低收入公寓楼中三种臭虫管理策略的比较
Insects. 2012 Apr 2;3(2):402-9. doi: 10.3390/insects3020402.
10
Field Study of the Comparative Efficacy of Three Pyrethroid/Neonicotinoid Mixture Products for the Control of the Common Bed Bug, Cimex lectularius.三种拟除虫菊酯/新烟碱类混合产品防治温带臭虫(Cimex lectularius)效果比较的田间研究
Insects. 2015 Mar 18;6(1):197-205. doi: 10.3390/insects6010197.