Kessler Dimitri A, MacKay James W, McDonald Scott, McDonnell Stephen, Grainger Andrew J, Roberts Alexandra R, Janiczek Robert L, Graves Martin J, Kaggie Joshua D, Gilbert Fiona J
Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, UK.
Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Dec;52(6):1753-1764. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27278. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
Determining the compositional response of articular cartilage to dynamic joint-loading using MRI may be a more sensitive assessment of cartilage status than conventional static imaging. However, distinguishing the effects of joint-loading vs. inherent measurement variability remains difficult, as the repeatability of these quantitative methods is often not assessed or reported.
To assess exercise-induced changes in femoral, tibial, and patellar articular cartilage composition and compare these against measurement repeatability.
Prospective observational study.
Phantom and 19 healthy participants.
FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T; 3D fat-saturated spoiled gradient recalled-echo; T - and T -prepared pseudosteady-state 3D fast spin echo.
The intrasessional repeatability of T and T relaxation mapping, with and without knee repositioning between two successive measurements, was determined in 10 knees. T and T relaxation mapping of nine knees was performed before and at multiple timepoints after a 5-minute repeated, joint-loading stepping activity. 3D surface models were created from patellar, femoral, and tibial articular cartilage.
Repeatability was assessed using root-mean-squared-CV (RMS-CV). Using Bland-Altman analysis, thresholds defined as the smallest detectable difference (SDD) were determined from the repeatability data with knee repositioning.
Without knee repositioning, both surface-averaged T and T were very repeatable on all cartilage surfaces, with RMS-CV <1.1%. Repositioning of the knee had the greatest effect on T of patellar cartilage with the surface-averaged RMS-CV = 4.8%. While T showed the greatest response to exercise at the patellofemoral cartilage region, the largest changes in T were determined in the lateral femorotibial region. Following thresholding, significant (>SDD) average exercise-induced in T and T of femoral (-8.0% and -5.3%), lateral tibial (-6.9% and -5.9%), medial tibial (+5.8% and +2.9%), and patellar (-7.9% and +2.8%) cartilage were observed.
Joint-loading with a stepping activity resulted in T and T changes above background measurement error.
2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 1 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2020;52:1753-1764.
使用磁共振成像(MRI)确定关节软骨对动态关节负荷的成分反应,可能比传统静态成像对软骨状态的评估更为敏感。然而,区分关节负荷的影响与固有的测量变异性仍然困难,因为这些定量方法的可重复性往往未得到评估或报告。
评估运动引起的股骨、胫骨和髌骨关节软骨成分变化,并将其与测量可重复性进行比较。
前瞻性观察研究。
假体和19名健康参与者。
场强/序列:3T;三维脂肪饱和扰相梯度回波;T1和T2准备的伪稳态三维快速自旋回波。
在10个膝关节中,测定了T1和T2弛豫映射在两次连续测量之间有无膝关节重新定位情况下的扫描内可重复性。在5分钟重复的关节负荷踏步活动之前和多个时间点,对9个膝关节进行了T1和T2弛豫映射。从髌、股、胫骨关节软骨创建了三维表面模型。
使用均方根变异系数(RMS-CV)评估可重复性。使用布兰德-奥特曼分析,根据膝关节重新定位时的可重复性数据确定定义为最小可检测差异(SDD)的阈值。
在无膝关节重新定位的情况下,所有软骨表面的表面平均T1和T2均具有很高的可重复性,RMS-CV<1.1%。膝关节重新定位对髌软骨T1的影响最大,表面平均RMS-CV = 4.8%。虽然T2在髌股软骨区域对运动的反应最大,但T1的最大变化出现在外侧胫股区域。经过阈值处理后,观察到股骨(-8.0%和-5.3%)、外侧胫骨(-6.9%和-5.9%)、内侧胫骨(+5.8%和+2.9%)和髌骨(-7.9%和+2.8%)软骨的平均运动诱导T1和T2显著(>SDD)变化。
踏步活动引起的关节负荷导致T1和T2变化超过背景测量误差。
2 技术效能阶段:1 《磁共振成像杂志》2020年;52:1753 - 1764。