Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark
Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020 Sep;10(3):350-357. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002325. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
To assess the effect of a systematic, fast-track transition from oncological treatment to specialised palliative care at home on symptom burden, to explore intervention mechanisms through patient and intervention provider characteristics and to assess long-term survival and place of death.
The effect of a systematic, fast-track transition from oncological treatment to specialised palliative care at home on patient symptom burden was studied in the Domus randomised clinical trial. Participants had incurable cancer and limited treatment options. The intervention was provided by specialised palliative home teams (SPT) based in hospice or hospital and was enriched with a psychological intervention for patient and caregiver dyad. Symptom burden was measured with Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS-r) at baseline, 8 weeks and 6 months follow-up and analysed with mixed models. Survival and place of death was analysed with Kaplan-Meier and Fisher's exact tests.
The study included 322 patients. Tiredness was significantly improved for the Domus intervention group at 6 months while the other nine symptom outcomes were not significantly different from the control group. Exploring the efficacy of intervention provider demonstrated significant differences in favour of the hospice SPT on four symptoms and total symptom score. Patients with children responded more favourably to the intervention. The long-term follow-up demonstrated no differences between the intervention and the control groups regarding survival or home deaths.
The Domus intervention may reduce tiredness. Moreover, the intervention provider and having children might play a role concerning intervention efficacy. The intervention did not affect survival or home deaths.
NCT01885637.
评估在家庭中从肿瘤治疗到专门的姑息治疗的系统、快速过渡对症状负担的影响,通过患者和干预提供者的特征探索干预机制,并评估长期生存和死亡地点。
在 Domus 随机临床试验中,研究了在家庭中从肿瘤治疗到专门的姑息治疗的系统、快速过渡对患者症状负担的影响。参与者患有无法治愈的癌症且治疗选择有限。干预措施由基于临终关怀或医院的专门姑息治疗家庭团队(SPT)提供,并为患者和照顾者对加强心理干预。症状负担通过 Edmonton 症状评估系统(ESAS-r)在基线、8 周和 6 个月随访时进行测量,并采用混合模型进行分析。生存和死亡地点采用 Kaplan-Meier 和 Fisher 精确检验进行分析。
该研究纳入了 322 名患者。与对照组相比,Domus 干预组在 6 个月时的疲倦症状显著改善,而其他 9 个症状结果则无显著差异。探索干预提供者的疗效表明,在四个症状和总症状评分方面,临终关怀 SPT 具有显著优势。有孩子的患者对干预的反应更为有利。长期随访结果表明,干预组和对照组在生存或家中死亡方面没有差异。
Domus 干预可能减轻疲倦感。此外,干预提供者和有孩子可能对干预效果起作用。干预对生存或家中死亡没有影响。
NCT01885637。