Suppr超能文献

住院原因:家庭专项癌症姑息治疗的随机对照试验。

Causes of Hospital Admissions in Domus: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Specialized Palliative Cancer Care at Home.

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Mar;55(3):728-736. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.10.007. Epub 2017 Oct 19.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Avoidable hospital admissions are important negative indicators of quality of end-of-life care. Specialized palliative care (SPC) may support patients remaining at home.

OBJECTIVES

Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate if SPC at home could prevent hospital admissions in patients with incurable cancer.

METHODS

These are secondary results of Domus: a randomized controlled trial of accelerated transition to SPC with psychological intervention at home (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01885637). Participants were patients with incurable cancer and limited antineoplastic treatment options and their caregivers. They were included from the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Denmark, between 2013 and 2016. The control group received usual care. Outcomes were hospital admissions, causes thereof, and patient and caregiver perceptions of place of care (home, hospital, etc.) at baseline, four weeks, eight weeks, and six months.

RESULTS

During the study, 340 patients were randomized and 322 were included in modified intention-to-treat analyses. Overall, there were no significant differences in hospital admissions between the groups. The intervention group had more admissions triggered by worsened general health (22% vs. 16%, P = 0.0436) or unmanageable home situation (8% vs. 4%, P = 0.0119). After diagnostics, admissions were more often caused by clinical symptoms of cancer without progression in the intervention group (11% vs. 7%, P = 0.0493). The two groups did not differ significantly in overall potentially avoidable admissions. Both groups felt mostly safe about their place of care.

CONCLUSION

The intervention did not prevent hospital admissions. Likely, any intervention effects were outweighed by increased identification of problems in the intervention group leading to hospital admissions. Overall, patients and caregivers felt safe in their current place of care.

摘要

背景

可避免的住院是临终关怀质量的重要负面指标。专门的姑息治疗(SPC)可以支持患者留在家里。

目的

因此,本研究的目的是调查 SPC 是否可以预防不治之症患者的住院。

方法

这是 Domus 的次要结果:一项在家中进行 SPC 加速过渡的随机对照试验,伴有心理干预(Clinicaltrials.gov:NCT01885637)。参与者为患有不治之症且抗癌治疗选择有限的患者及其护理人员。他们于 2013 年至 2016 年期间从丹麦 Rigshospitalet 肿瘤学系纳入。对照组接受常规护理。主要结局为住院、住院原因以及患者和护理人员在基线、4 周、8 周和 6 个月时对护理地点(家庭、医院等)的看法。

结果

在研究期间,对 340 名患者进行了随机分组,其中 322 名患者纳入意向治疗的修改分析。总体而言,两组之间的住院率没有显著差异。干预组因一般健康状况恶化(22%对 16%,P=0.0436)或无法管理的家庭状况(8%对 4%,P=0.0119)而入院的比例更高。在诊断后,干预组因癌症的临床症状而入院的比例更高,且无进展(11%对 7%,P=0.0493)。两组在总体上可避免的入院率上没有显著差异。两组对护理地点的安全性均有较高的满意度。

结论

干预措施并未预防住院。可能是干预组增加了对问题的识别,导致了更多的住院,从而抵消了任何干预效果。总体而言,患者和护理人员对其当前护理地点感到安全。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验