Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York (Dr. Seaman); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (Drs. Jorgensen, Mendiola, Ricciotti, and Hur); Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr. Jones); Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (Ms. Tramontano).
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York (Dr. Seaman); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (Drs. Jorgensen, Mendiola, Ricciotti, and Hur); Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr. Jones); Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (Ms. Tramontano).
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Apr;28(4):794-800. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
To compare the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) exam scores between obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) and general surgery (GS) providers.
This is a retrospective cohort study at a single institution from July 2007 to May 2018. Categorical and continuous variables were analyzed with χ2 test, t test, and Wilcoxon rank sum test.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC), Boston, MA, a tertiary care academic medical center.
All providers who took the FLS exam at the Carl J. Shapiro Simulation and Skills Center at BIDMC.
FLS certification.
A total of 205 BIDMC trainees and faculty took the FLS exam between July 2007 and May 2018, of which 176 were identified to be OBGYN or GS providers. The FLS certification pass rate was high for both specialties (97.0% OBGYN vs 96.1% sGS, p = .76). When comparing all providers, no significant difference was found in the mean manual skill test scores between surgical specialties (594.9 OBGYN vs 601.0 GS, p = .59); whereas, a significant difference was noted in the mean cognitive scores, with GS providers scoring higher than OBGYN providers (533.8 OBGYN vs 583.4 GS, p <.001). However, when adjusting for several variables in a multivariate linear regression model, surgical specialty was not a predictor for cognitive scores. In the multivariate analysis, age, sex, and test year were predictors for cognitive scores, with higher scores associated with younger age, male sex, and advancing calendar year. None of the variables were significant predictors of manual scores.
Both OBGYN and GS providers had extremely high FLS pass rates. In the multivariate analysis, surgical specialty was not a predictor for higher FLS test scores for either manual or cognitive test scores. Although OBGYN residency programs offer fewer years of training, OBGYN trainees demonstrate the capacity to perform well on the FLS exam.
比较妇产科(OBGYN)和普通外科(GS)医生在腹腔镜手术基础(FLS)考试中的成绩。
这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究,于 2007 年 7 月至 2018 年 5 月在贝斯以色列女执事医疗中心(BIDMC)进行。使用卡方检验、t 检验和 Wilcoxon 秩和检验对分类变量和连续变量进行分析。
马萨诸塞州波士顿的贝斯以色列女执事医疗中心(BIDMC),是一家三级保健学术医疗中心。
所有在 BIDMC 的卡尔·J·夏皮罗模拟和技能中心参加 FLS 考试的医生。
FLS 认证。
共有 205 名 BIDMC 学员和教员于 2007 年 7 月至 2018 年 5 月参加了 FLS 考试,其中 176 名被确定为 OBGYN 或 GS 医生。两个专业的 FLS 认证通过率都很高(妇产科 97.0%,普通外科 96.1%,p=0.76)。当比较所有医生时,外科专业的手动技能测试平均分数没有显著差异(妇产科 594.9,普通外科 601.0,p=0.59);然而,认知分数存在显著差异,普通外科医生的分数高于妇产科医生(妇产科 533.8,普通外科 583.4,p<0.001)。然而,在多元线性回归模型中调整了几个变量后,外科专业并不是认知分数的预测因素。在多元分析中,年龄、性别和考试年份是认知分数的预测因素,年龄较小、性别为男性和日历年份的进展与分数较高相关。没有一个变量是手动分数的显著预测因素。
妇产科和普通外科医生的 FLS 通过率都非常高。在多元分析中,外科专业并不是手动或认知测试分数较高的 FLS 考试成绩的预测因素。尽管妇产科住院医师培训项目提供的培训年限较少,但妇产科医生在 FLS 考试中表现出了很好的能力。