• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种种植体-基台连接设计的种植体周围骨裂阻力。

Fracture resistance after implantoplasty in three implant-abutment connection designs.

出版信息

Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2020 Sep 1;25(5):e691-e699. doi: 10.4317/medoral.23700.

DOI:10.4317/medoral.23700
PMID:32683385
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7473443/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To assess the effect of implantoplasty and implant-abutment design on the fracture resistance and macroscopic morphology of narrow-diameter (3.5 mm) dental implants.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Screw-shaped titanium dental implants (n = 48) were studied in vitro. Three groups (n = 16) were established, based on implant-abutment connection type: external hexagon, internal hexagon and conical. Eight implants from each group were subjected to an implantoplasty procedure; the remaining 8 implants served as controls. Implant wall thickness was recorded. All samples were subjected to a static strength test.

RESULTS

The mean wall thickness reductions varied between 106.46 and 153.75 µm. The mean fracture strengths for the control and test groups were, respectively, 1211.90±89.95 N and 873.11±92.37 N in the external hexagon implants; 918.41±97.19 N and 661.29±58.03 N in the internal hexagon implants; and 1058.67±114.05 N and 747.32±90.05 N in the conical connection implants. Implant wall thickness and fracture resistance (P < 0.001) showed a positive correlation. Fracture strength was influenced by both implantoplasty (P < 0.001) and connection type (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Implantoplasty in diameter-reduced implants decreases implant wall thickness and fracture resistance, and varies depending on the implant-abutment connection. Internal hexagon and conical connection implants seem to be more prone to fracture after implantoplasty.

摘要

背景

评估种植体预备和种植体-基台连接设计对小直径(3.5 毫米)牙科种植体抗折强度和宏观形态的影响。

材料和方法

体外研究了螺旋形钛牙科种植体(n = 48)。基于种植体-基台连接类型,建立了 3 个组(n = 16):外六方、内六方和锥形。每组 8 个种植体进行种植体预备程序;其余 8 个种植体作为对照。记录种植体壁厚度。所有样本均进行静态强度测试。

结果

壁厚度减少的平均值在 106.46 和 153.75 µm 之间。外六方种植体中,对照组和试验组的平均断裂强度分别为 1211.90±89.95 N 和 873.11±92.37 N;内六方种植体分别为 918.41±97.19 N 和 661.29±58.03 N;锥形连接种植体分别为 1058.67±114.05 N 和 747.32±90.05 N。种植体壁厚度和抗折强度(P < 0.001)呈正相关。种植体预备(P < 0.001)和连接类型(P < 0.001)均影响断裂强度。

结论

在直径减小的种植体中进行种植体预备会降低种植体壁厚度和抗折强度,并且取决于种植体-基台连接。内六方和锥形连接种植体在进行种植体预备后似乎更容易发生骨折。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4231/7473443/efe8fdc2eb11/medoral-25-e691-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4231/7473443/048e374bb476/medoral-25-e691-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4231/7473443/2bb4ecde7d20/medoral-25-e691-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4231/7473443/efe8fdc2eb11/medoral-25-e691-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4231/7473443/048e374bb476/medoral-25-e691-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4231/7473443/2bb4ecde7d20/medoral-25-e691-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4231/7473443/efe8fdc2eb11/medoral-25-e691-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Fracture resistance after implantoplasty in three implant-abutment connection designs.三种种植体-基台连接设计的种植体周围骨裂阻力。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2020 Sep 1;25(5):e691-e699. doi: 10.4317/medoral.23700.
2
Analysis of Implant Strength After Implantoplasty in Three Implant-Abutment Connection Designs: An In Vitro Study.三种种植体-基台连接设计的种植体成形术后种植体强度分析:一项体外研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 May-Jun;31(3):e65-70. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4399.
3
Fracture strength of zirconia implant abutments on narrow diameter implants with internal and external implant abutment connections: A study on the titanium resin base concept.带内连接和外连接的种植体基台的窄径氧化锆种植体的抗折强度:钛树脂基台概念的研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Apr;29(4):411-423. doi: 10.1111/clr.13139. Epub 2018 Mar 11.
4
Displacement and performance of abutments in narrow-diameter implants with different internal connections.不同内连接的细径种植体基台的位移和性能。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Jan;127(1):100-106. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.11.008. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
5
Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.老化后支持全瓷冠的氧化锆和钛种植体基台的弯矩
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jan;25(1):74-81. doi: 10.1111/clr.12192. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
6
Effect of implantoplasty on fracture resistance and surface roughness of standard diameter dental implants.种植体成形术对标准直径牙种植体抗折强度和表面粗糙度的影响。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Jan;29(1):46-54. doi: 10.1111/clr.13037. Epub 2017 Jul 23.
7
Fatigue Failure of Narrow Implants with Different Implant-Abutment Connection Designs.不同种植体-基台连接设计的窄径种植体疲劳失效
J Prosthodont. 2018 Aug;27(7):659-664. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12540. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
8
Impact of implantoplasty on strength of the implant-abutment complex.种植体-基台复合体强度的种植体成形术的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Nov-Dec;28(6):1530-5. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3227.
9
Effect of implantoplasty on the elastic limit of dental implants of different diameters.种植体成形术对不同直径种植体弹性极限的影响。
Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Aug 24;7(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00363-6.
10
Effect of crown to implant ratio and implantoplasty on the fracture resistance of narrow dental implants with marginal bone loss: an in vitro study.冠根比和种植体成形术对边缘骨丧失的窄径种植体抗折强度的影响:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Nov 19;20(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01323-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of Different Implantoplasty Designs on the Fatigue Resistance of Dental Implants: A Systematic Review.不同种植体成形术设计对牙种植体抗疲劳性的影响:一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 29;14(17):6103. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176103.
2
Clinical Factors on Dental Implant Fractures: A Systematic Review.牙种植体骨折的临床因素:一项系统评价。
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Jun 28;12(7):200. doi: 10.3390/dj12070200.
3
Assessing the Impact of Various Decontamination Instruments on Titanium and Zirconia Dental Implants: An In Vitro Study.评估各种去污器械对钛和氧化锆牙科种植体的影响:一项体外研究。

本文引用的文献

1
Peri-implantitis.种植体周围炎。
J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S267-S290. doi: 10.1002/JPER.16-0350.
2
Influence of implantoplasty on stress distribution of exposed implants at different bone insertion levels.种植体周围骨增量术对不同骨植入水平暴露种植体的应力分布的影响。
Braz Oral Res. 2017 Dec 7;31:e96. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0096.
3
Effect of implantoplasty on fracture resistance and surface roughness of standard diameter dental implants.种植体成形术对标准直径牙种植体抗折强度和表面粗糙度的影响。
Dent J (Basel). 2024 May 9;12(5):136. doi: 10.3390/dj12050136.
4
An In Vitro Investigation of the Role of Implant Abutment Materials on the Fracture Resistance and Failure Mode of Implant-Supported Restorations.种植体基台材料对种植体支持修复体抗折性和失效模式影响的体外研究
Cureus. 2024 Feb 21;16(2):e54624. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54624. eCollection 2024 Feb.
5
Efficacy of implantoplasty in management of peri-implantitis: A systematic review.种植体周围炎治疗中引导骨组织再生术的疗效:系统评价。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2023 Jul-Sep;23(3):210-217. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_102_23.
6
Biomechanical behavior of implants with different diameters in relation to simulated bone loss- an in vitro study.不同直径种植体与模拟骨量损失关系的生物力学行为:一项体外研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Oct;27(10):5887-5894. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05199-5. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
7
Effect of Implantoplasty on Roughness, Fatigue and Corrosion Behavior of Narrow Diameter Dental Implants.种植体oplasty对窄直径牙种植体粗糙度、疲劳及腐蚀行为的影响
J Funct Biomater. 2023 Jan 21;14(2):61. doi: 10.3390/jfb14020061.
8
The Effect of an Er, Cr: YSGG Laser Combined with Implantoplasty Treatment on Implant Surface Roughness and Morphologic Analysis: A Pilot In Vitro Study.铒铬:钇钪镓石榴石激光联合种植体成形术治疗对种植体表面粗糙度及形态分析的影响:一项体外初步研究
J Funct Biomater. 2022 Aug 29;13(3):133. doi: 10.3390/jfb13030133.
9
Mechanical Properties and Corrosion Behavior of Ti6Al4V Particles Obtained by Implantoplasty: An In Vitro Study. Part II.植入成形术获取的Ti6Al4V颗粒的力学性能与腐蚀行为:一项体外研究。第二部分。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Oct 29;14(21):6519. doi: 10.3390/ma14216519.
10
Effect of bone loss on the fracture resistance of narrow dental implants after implantoplasty. An in vitro study.骨量损失对种植体成形术后窄径种植体抗折力的影响:一项体外研究。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2021 Sep 1;26(5):e611-e618. doi: 10.4317/medoral.24624.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Jan;29(1):46-54. doi: 10.1111/clr.13037. Epub 2017 Jul 23.
4
Prevalences of peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis: systematic review and meta-analysis.种植体周围炎和种植体周围黏膜炎的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Dent. 2017 Jul;62:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.04.011. Epub 2017 May 3.
5
The influence of implantoplasty on the diameter, chemical surface composition, and biocompatibility of titanium implants.种植体成形术对钛种植体直径、化学表面成分和生物相容性的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Sep;21(7):2355-2361. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-2030-x. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
6
Analysis of Implant Strength After Implantoplasty in Three Implant-Abutment Connection Designs: An In Vitro Study.三种种植体-基台连接设计的种植体成形术后种植体强度分析:一项体外研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 May-Jun;31(3):e65-70. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4399.
7
Reentry After Combined Surgical Resective and Regenerative Therapy of Advanced Peri-implantitis: A Retrospective Analysis of Five Cases.晚期种植体周围炎联合手术切除与再生治疗后的再附着:5例回顾性分析
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2015 Sep-Oct;35(5):647-53. doi: 10.11607/prd.2320.
8
Surface roughness of dental implants and treatment time using six different implantoplasty procedures.使用六种不同的种植体成形术时牙科种植体的表面粗糙度及治疗时间
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Jul;27(7):776-81. doi: 10.1111/clr.12682. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
9
Peri-implant health and disease. A systematic review of current epidemiology.种植体周围健康与疾病。当前流行病学的系统评价。
J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Apr;42 Suppl 16:S158-71. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12334.
10
Management of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis.种植体周围黏膜炎和种植体周围炎的处理。
Periodontol 2000. 2014 Oct;66(1):255-73. doi: 10.1111/prd.12049.