Ono Shunsuke, Ueda Yoshihiro, Inui Shoki, Isono Masaru, Ohira Shingo, Murata Seiya, Miyazaki Masayoshi, Teshima Teruki
Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, 3-1-69 Otemae, Chuou-ku, Osaka, 537-8567, Japan.
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2020 Sep-Oct;25(5):703-708. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.06.004. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
We investigated the change of dose distributions in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) under baseline drift (BD) during breath holding.
Ten VMAT plans recalculated to a static field at a gantry angle of 0° were prepared for measurement with a 2D array device and five original VMAT plans were prepared for measurement with gafchromic films. These measurement approaches were driven by a waveform reproducing breath holding with BD. We considered breath holding times of 15 and 10 s, and BD at four speeds; specifically, BD0 (0 mm/s), BD0.2 (0.2 mm/s), BD0.3 (0.3 mm/s), and BD0.4 (0.4 mm/s). The BD was periodically reproduced from the isocenter along the craniocaudal direction and the shift during breath holding (Shift) ranged 0-6 mm.The dose distribution of BD0.2, BD0.3 and BD0.4 were compared to that of BD0 using gamma analysis with the criterion of 2%/2 mm.
The mean pass rates of each Shift were 99.8% and 98.9% at 0 mm, 96.8% and 99.4% at 2 mm, 94.9% and 98.6% at 3 mm, 91.5% and 98.4% at 4 mm, 70.8% and 94.1% at 4.5 mm, and 55.0% and 83.6% at 6 mm for the array and film measurements, respectively.
We found significant differences in Shift above 4 mm ( < 0.05). Hence, it is recommended that breath holding time should be shortened for patients to preserve the reproducibility of dose distributions.
我们研究了屏气期间基线漂移(BD)情况下容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)中剂量分布的变化。
准备了10个在机架角度为0°时重新计算为静态野的VMAT计划,用于二维阵列设备测量,以及5个原始VMAT计划用于Gafchromic胶片测量。这些测量方法由带有BD的波形重现屏气驱动。我们考虑了15秒和10秒的屏气时间以及四种速度的BD;具体而言,BD0(0毫米/秒)、BD0.2(0.2毫米/秒)、BD0.3(0.3毫米/秒)和BD0.4(0.4毫米/秒)。BD从等中心沿头脚方向周期性重现,屏气期间的位移(Shift)范围为0 - 6毫米。使用2%/2毫米标准的伽马分析将BD0.2、BD0.3和BD0.4的剂量分布与BD0的剂量分布进行比较。
对于阵列测量和胶片测量,每次Shift在0毫米处的平均通过率分别为99.8%和98.9%,在2毫米处为96.8%和99.4%,在3毫米处为94.9%和98.6%,在4毫米处为91.5%和98.4%,在4.5毫米处为70.8%和94.1%,在6毫米处为55.0%和83.6%。
我们发现位移大于4毫米时有显著差异(P < 0.05)。因此,建议缩短患者的屏气时间以保持剂量分布的可重复性。