Peacock W Frank, Coleman Craig I, Wells Phil, Fermann Gregory J, Wang Li, Baser Onur, Schein Jeff, Crivera Concetta
Institution: Baylor College of Medicine.
Institution: University of Connecticut.
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2019 Oct 2;6(3):160-173. doi: 10.36469/9936. eCollection 2019.
Rivaroxaban, a fixed-dose oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, does not require continuous monitoring and thus reduces the hospital stay and economic burden in low-risk pulmonary embolism (LRPE) patients. Study Question: What is the effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus the standard of care (SOC; low-molecular-weight heparin, unfractionated heparin, warfarin) among LRPE patients in the Veterans Health Administration?
Adult patients with continuous health plan enrollment for ≥12 months pre- and 3 months post-inpatient PE diagnosis (index date=discharge date) between October 1, 2011-June 30, 2015 and an anticoagulant claim during the index hospitalization were included.
Patients scoring 0 points on the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Stratification Index were considered low-risk and were stratified into SOC and rivaroxaban cohorts. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare hospital-acquired complications (HACs), PE-related outcomes (recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, and death), and healthcare utilization and costs between the rivaroxaban and SOC cohorts.
Among 6746 PE patients, 1918 were low-risk; of these, 73 were prescribed rivaroxaban, 1546 were prescribed SOC, and 299 were prescribed other anticoagulants during the index hospitalization. After 1:3 PSM, 64 rivaroxaban and 192 SOC patients were included. During the index hospitalization, rivaroxaban users (versus SOC) had similar inpatient length of stay (LOS; 7.0 vs 6.7 days, standardized difference [STD]=1.8) but fewer HACs (4.7% vs 10.4%; STD: 21.7). In the 90-day post-discharge period, PE-related outcome rates were similar between the cohorts (all p>0.05). However, rivaroxaban users had fewer outpatient (15.9 vs 20.4; p=0.0002) visits per patient as well as lower inpatient ($765 vs $2,655; p<0.0001), pharmacy ($711 vs $1,086; p=0.0033), and total costs ($6,270 vs $9,671; p=0.0027).
LRPE patients prescribed rivaroxaban had similar index LOS and PE-related outcomes, but fewer HACs, and lower total costs than those prescribed SOC.
利伐沙班是一种固定剂量的口服直接Xa因子抑制剂,无需持续监测,因此可缩短低风险肺栓塞(LRPE)患者的住院时间并减轻经济负担。研究问题:在退伍军人健康管理局的LRPE患者中,利伐沙班与标准治疗(SOC;低分子量肝素、普通肝素、华法林)相比的疗效如何?
纳入2011年10月1日至2015年6月30日期间,在住院PE诊断前连续参加健康计划≥12个月且诊断后3个月(索引日期=出院日期),并在索引住院期间有抗凝治疗记录的成年患者。
在简化肺栓塞分层指数上得0分的患者被视为低风险,并被分为SOC组和利伐沙班组。采用倾向得分匹配(PSM)比较利伐沙班组和SOC组之间的医院获得性并发症(HAC)、PE相关结局(复发性静脉血栓栓塞、大出血和死亡)以及医疗利用情况和费用。
在6746例PE患者中,1918例为低风险;其中,73例在索引住院期间被处方利伐沙班,1546例被处方SOC,299例被处方其他抗凝剂。经过1:3的PSM后,纳入64例利伐沙班患者和192例SOC患者。在索引住院期间,使用利伐沙班的患者(与SOC组相比)住院时间相似(住院时长[LOS]:7.0天对6.7天,标准化差异[STD]=1.8),但HAC较少(4.7%对10.4%;STD:21.7)。在出院后90天内,两组之间的PE相关结局发生率相似(所有p>0.05)。然而,使用利伐沙班的患者每人门诊就诊次数较少(15.9次对20.4次;p=0.0002),住院费用较低(765美元对2655美元;p<0.0001)、药房费用较低(711美元对1086美元;p=0.0033)以及总费用较低(6270美元对9671美元;p=0.0027)。
与处方SOC的LRPE患者相比,处方利伐沙班的患者索引住院时长和PE相关结局相似,但HAC较少,总费用较低。