• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与华法林相比,接受利伐沙班治疗的肺栓塞住院患者住院时间更短,费用更低。

Pulmonary Embolism Inpatients Treated With Rivaroxaban Had Shorter Hospital Stays and Lower Costs Compared With Warfarin.

作者信息

Margolis Jay M, Deitelzweig Steven, Kline Jeffrey, Tran Oth, Smith David M, Crivera Concetta, Bookhart Brahim, Schein Jeff

机构信息

Truven Health Analytics, Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania.

Ochsner Health System and The University of Queensland School of Medicine, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, Louisiana.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2016 Nov;38(11):2496-2503. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.09.007. Epub 2016 Oct 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.09.007
PMID:27751675
Abstract

PURPOSE

Using real-world data, this study compares inpatient length of stay (LOS) and costs for patients with a primary diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) initiating treatment with oral anticoagulation with rivaroxaban versus warfarin.

METHODS

Hospitalizations from MarketScan's Hospital Drug Database were selected from November 1, 2012, through December 31, 2013, for adults with a primary diagnosis of PE initiating treatment with rivaroxaban or warfarin. Warfarin patients were matched 1:1 to rivaroxaban patients using exact and propensity score matching. Hospital LOS, treatment patterns, and hospitalization costs were evaluated.

FINDINGS

Matched cohorts included 751 rivaroxaban-treated patients and 751 warfarin-treated patients. Adjusted mean LOS was 3.77 days for rivaroxaban patients (95% CI, 3.66-3.87 days) and 5.48 days for warfarin patients (95% CI, 5.33-5.63 days; P < .001). Mean (SD) LOS was shorter for patients taking rivaroxaban whether admission was for provoked PE (rivaroxaban: 5.2 [5.1] days; warfarin: 7.0 [6.5] days; P < .001) or unprovoked PE (rivaroxaban: 3.4 [2.3] days; warfarin: 5.1 [2.7] days; P < .001). Mean (SD) days from first dose to discharge were 2.5 (1.7) (rivaroxaban) and 4.0 (2.9) (warfarin) when initiated with parenteral anticoagulants (P < .001) and 2.7 (1.7) (rivaroxaban) and 4.0 (2.2) (warfarin) without parenteral anticoagulants (P < .001). The rivaroxaban cohort incurred significantly lower unadjusted mean (SD) hospitalization costs (rivaroxaban: $8473 [$9105]; warfarin: $10,291 [$9185]; P < .001), confirmed by covariate adjustment with generalized linear modeling estimating predicted mean hospitalization costs of $8266 for rivaroxaban patients (95% CI, $7851-$8681) and $10,511 for warfarin patients (95% CI, $10,031-$10,992; P < .001).

IMPLICATIONS

patients with PE treated with rivaroxaban incurred significantly lower hospitalization costs by $2245 per admission compared with patients treated with warfarin, which was attributable to cost offsets from 1.71 fewer days of stay in the hospital.

摘要

目的

本研究利用真实世界数据,比较初始采用利伐沙班口服抗凝治疗与华法林治疗的原发性肺栓塞(PE)患者的住院时间(LOS)和费用。

方法

从2012年11月1日至2013年12月31日,从MarketScan医院药品数据库中选取原发性诊断为PE且初始采用利伐沙班或华法林治疗的成年住院患者。采用精确匹配和倾向评分匹配将华法林治疗患者与利伐沙班治疗患者按1:1进行匹配。评估住院LOS、治疗模式和住院费用。

结果

匹配队列包括751例接受利伐沙班治疗的患者和751例接受华法林治疗的患者。利伐沙班治疗患者的调整后平均LOS为3.77天(95%CI,3.66 - 3.87天),华法林治疗患者为5.48天(95%CI,5.33 - 5.63天;P <.001)。无论入院是因诱因性PE(利伐沙班:5.2[5.1]天;华法林:7.0[6.5]天;P <.001)还是非诱因性PE(利伐沙班:3.4[2.3]天;华法林:5.1[2.7]天;P <.001),服用利伐沙班的患者平均(SD)LOS均较短。初始使用肠外抗凝剂时,从首剂到出院的平均(SD)天数为2.5(1.7)(利伐沙班)和4.0(2.9)(华法林)(P <.001);未使用肠外抗凝剂时,分别为2.7(1.7)(利伐沙班)和4.0(2.2)(华法林)(P <.001)。利伐沙班组未调整的平均(SD)住院费用显著更低(利伐沙班:8473美元[9105美元];华法林:10291美元[9185美元];P <.001),通过广义线性模型进行协变量调整后得到证实,估计利伐沙班治疗患者的预测平均住院费用为8266美元(95%CI,7851 - 8681美元),华法林治疗患者为10511美元(95%CI,10031 - 10992美元;P <.001)。

结论

与接受华法林治疗

相似文献

1
Pulmonary Embolism Inpatients Treated With Rivaroxaban Had Shorter Hospital Stays and Lower Costs Compared With Warfarin.与华法林相比,接受利伐沙班治疗的肺栓塞住院患者住院时间更短,费用更低。
Clin Ther. 2016 Nov;38(11):2496-2503. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.09.007. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
2
Shorter Hospital Stays and Lower Costs for Rivaroxaban Compared With Warfarin for Venous Thrombosis Admissions.与华法林相比,利伐沙班用于静脉血栓形成入院治疗时住院时间更短且费用更低。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Oct 6;5(10):e003788. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003788.
3
Hospital length-of-stay and costs among pulmonary embolism patients treated with rivaroxaban versus parenteral bridging to warfarin.接受利伐沙班治疗的肺栓塞患者与接受胃肠外桥接华法林治疗的肺栓塞患者的住院时间和费用比较。
Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Apr;12(3):311-318. doi: 10.1007/s11739-016-1552-1. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
4
Shortened hospital length of stay and lower costs associated with rivaroxaban in patients with pulmonary embolism managed as observation status.对于以观察状态管理的肺栓塞患者,利伐沙班可缩短住院时间并降低费用。
Int J Clin Pract. 2017 Jan;71(1). doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12915.
5
Is Rivaroxaban Associated With Shorter Hospital Stays and Reduced Costs Versus Parenteral Bridging to Warfarin Among Patients With Pulmonary Embolism?在肺栓塞患者中,与采用胃肠外桥接华法林相比,利伐沙班是否与缩短住院时间及降低费用相关?
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2017 Oct;23(7):830-837. doi: 10.1177/1076029616661415. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
6
Rivaroxaban versus Heparin Bridging to Warfarin Therapy: Impact on Hospital Length of Stay and Treatment Costs for Low-Risk Patients with Pulmonary Embolism.利伐沙班与肝素桥接华法林治疗:对低风险肺栓塞患者住院时间和治疗费用的影响。
Pharmacotherapy. 2016 Oct;36(10):1109-1115. doi: 10.1002/phar.1828. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
7
Overall Effectiveness of Rivaroxaban in Patients with Pulmonary Embolism.利伐沙班对肺栓塞患者的总体疗效
Clin Ther. 2017 Jul;39(7):1426-1436.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
8
Is rivaroxaban associated with lower inpatient costs compared to warfarin among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?在非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中,与华法林相比,利伐沙班是否与更低的住院费用相关?
Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Aug;30(8):1521-8. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.916159. Epub 2014 May 2.
9
Association between rivaroxaban use and length of hospital stay, treatment costs and early outcomes in patients with pulmonary embolism: a systematic review of real-world studies.利伐沙班的使用与肺栓塞患者住院时间、治疗费用及早期结局之间的关联:一项对真实世界研究的系统评价
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Sep;33(9):1697-1703. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1349659. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
10
Hospitalizations and Other Health Care Resource Utilization Among Patients with Deep Vein Thrombosis Treated with Rivaroxaban Versus Low-molecular-weight Heparin and Warfarin in the Outpatient Setting.在门诊环境中,接受利伐沙班治疗的深静脉血栓形成患者与接受低分子量肝素和华法林治疗的患者相比,住院及其他医疗资源利用情况。
Clin Ther. 2016 Aug;38(8):1803-1816.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of Different Anticoagulation Strategies With Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized With Acute Pulmonary Embolism.不同抗凝策略与急性肺栓塞住院患者预后的关联
Cureus. 2024 Jun 2;16(6):e61545. doi: 10.7759/cureus.61545. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.美国血液学会2020年静脉血栓栓塞管理指南:深静脉血栓形成和肺栓塞的治疗
Blood Adv. 2020 Oct 13;4(19):4693-4738. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001830.
3
Study protocol for a multicentre implementation trial of monotherapy anticoagulation to expedite home treatment of patients diagnosed with venous thromboembolism in the emergency department.
一项多中心实施试验的研究方案,该试验旨在采用单一疗法抗凝,以加快急诊科确诊为静脉血栓栓塞症患者的居家治疗。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 1;10(10):e038078. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038078.
4
Clinical and Economic Outcomes in Low-risk Pulmonary Embolism Patients Treated with Rivaroxaban versus Standard of Care.利伐沙班与标准治疗方案治疗低风险肺栓塞患者的临床及经济结局
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2019 Oct 2;6(3):160-173. doi: 10.36469/9936. eCollection 2019.
5
Systematic literature review of treatment patterns for venous thromboembolism patients during transitions from inpatient to post-discharge settings.静脉血栓栓塞症患者从住院到出院后阶段治疗模式的系统文献综述
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Dec 19;11:23-49. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S179080. eCollection 2019.
6
Hospital Resource Utilization and Costs Associated With Warfarin Versus Apixaban Treatment Among Patients Hospitalized for Venous Thromboembolism in the United States.美国静脉血栓栓塞住院患者中,华法林与阿哌沙班治疗相关的医院资源利用和成本。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2018 Dec;24(9_suppl):261S-268S. doi: 10.1177/1076029618800806. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
7
Apixaban or Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin for Treatment of Submassive Pulmonary Embolism After Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis.阿哌沙班或利伐沙班与华法林用于导管直接溶栓后亚大面积肺栓塞治疗的比较
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2018 Sep;24(6):908-913. doi: 10.1177/1076029618755311. Epub 2018 Feb 18.
8
Comparison of hospital length of stay in patients treated with non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants or parenteral agents plus warfarin for venous thromboembolism.非维生素K口服抗凝剂或肠外制剂联合华法林治疗静脉血栓栓塞患者的住院时间比较。
SAGE Open Med. 2017 Jul 18;5:2050312117719628. doi: 10.1177/2050312117719628. eCollection 2017.