Ščevková Jana, Vašková Zuzana, Sepšiová Regina, Dušička Jozef, Kováč Jozef
Comenius University, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Department of Botany, Révová 39, 811 02, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Comenius University, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Department of Genetics, Ilkovičova 6, 842 48, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Heliyon. 2020 Jul 10;6(7):e04421. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04421. eCollection 2020 Jul.
The sensitization to grass pollen is a known problem in European countries. Phl p 5 is an important allergen recognized by the majority of grass sensitized individuals. In this study, we evaluated daily variation in airborne Poaceae pollen and Phl p 5 allergen concentrations to determine whether airborne pollen concentrations alone are sufficient to reflect the actual allergenic potential of the air. The relationships between the mentioned pollen and allergen concentrations and associated environmental variables were also examined. The airborne particles were collected during the Poaceae flowering season in Bratislava in 2019. Pollen sampling was performed using a Hirst-type sampler, while a cyclone sampler was used for the aeroallergen capturing. Allergenic molecules were quantified by ELISA assay. The associations between pollen and allergen concentrations showed that these two variables are positively correlated; however, the correlation was not significant. We observed the concurrent occurrence of airborne pollen and allergen peaks on the same day. Nevertheless, during some days of the pollen season, the allergen concentrations did not correspond to the airborne pollen values. Moreover, the days with low pollen concentration but high pollen potency and vice versa were observed. The effect of selected environmental variables on daily pollen and allergen concentrations was evaluated through Spearmans correlation analysis. Of all meteorological variables considered, air temperature, precipitation, and relative air humidity were significantly correlated with airborne pollen and/or allergen concentrations. The association with air temperature was positive, while the negative association was observed with precipitation and relative air humidity. Among the atmospheric pollutants, O and PM were significantly and positively associated with both pollen and allergen concentrations, whereas CO and PM were significantly and positively associated only with pollen concentration.
在欧洲国家,对草花粉过敏是一个已知问题。Phl p 5是大多数对草过敏个体所识别的一种重要过敏原。在本研究中,我们评估了空气中禾本科花粉和Phl p 5过敏原浓度的每日变化,以确定仅空气中的花粉浓度是否足以反映空气的实际致敏潜力。还研究了上述花粉和过敏原浓度与相关环境变量之间的关系。2019年在布拉迪斯拉发的禾本科开花季节收集空气颗粒物。花粉采样使用赫斯特型采样器,而气旋采样器用于捕获气传过敏原。通过酶联免疫吸附测定法对致敏分子进行定量。花粉和过敏原浓度之间的关联表明这两个变量呈正相关;然而,相关性不显著。我们观察到同一天空气中花粉和过敏原峰值同时出现。然而,在花粉季节的某些日子里,过敏原浓度与空气中的花粉值不对应。此外,还观察到花粉浓度低但花粉效力高以及反之亦然的日子。通过斯皮尔曼相关性分析评估所选环境变量对每日花粉和过敏原浓度的影响。在所有考虑的气象变量中,气温、降水量和相对空气湿度与空气中的花粉和/或过敏原浓度显著相关。与气温的关联为正,而与降水量和相对空气湿度的关联为负。在大气污染物中,O和PM与花粉和过敏原浓度均显著正相关,而CO和PM仅与花粉浓度显著正相关。