Umemmuo Maureen Uche, Efetie Efena Russ, Agboghoroma Chris Ovoroyeguono, Momoh Jafaru Alunua, Ikechebelu Joseph Ifeanyichukwu
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National Hospital Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria.
Department of Chemical Pathology, National Hospital Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria.
Niger Postgrad Med J. 2020 Jul-Sep;27(3):171-176. doi: 10.4103/npmj.npmj_65_20.
Gonadotrophin-Releasing Hormone agonist (GnRHa) - long and short acting - is used for pituitary down regulation prior to ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment. However, there are controversies in the literature as to their effectiveness, dose of gonadotrophin needed subsequently for ovarian stimulation and the clinical outcome.
The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of single-dose long-acting GnRHa - goserelin - and daily dose short-acting GnRHa - buserelin - for pituitary down regulation and their clinical outcome in IVF treatment.
: This prospective comparative study was undertaken at the IVF centre in National Hospital Abuja, a public tertiary hospital in Nigeria. A total of 114 IVF patients were consecutively allocated into either long-acting GnRHa - goserelin - 3.6 mg single dose (Group A) or short-acting GnRHa - buserelin - 0.5 mg daily (Group B) both starting on day 21 of the cycle preceding the IVF treatment. The effects on pituitary down regulation and treatment outcomes were compared.
Time taken (days) to achieve down regulation (22.6 ± 4.3 vs. 26.1 ± 8.0; P = 0.084) and the mean number of human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) doses used (57.7 ± 13.7 vs. 54.2 ± 16.7; P = 0.222) were similar in the two groups. Although the number of oocytes retrieved (9.9 ± 6.7 vs. 7.2 ± 5.0; P = 0.02) and fertilised (6.2 ± 4.4 vs. 4.6 ± 3.5; P = 0.04) were significantly higher in Group A, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of embryos (4.4 ± 2.6 vs. 4.0 ± 3.0; P = 0.850) and clinical pregnancy rate at 6 weeks (49.2% vs. 43.6%; odds ratio 1.249; confidence interval = 0.579-2.612; P = 0.578) in both the groups. While group B had a significantly higher number of hospital visits (P = 0.0001) as well as a higher number of injections (P = 0.0001), the mean cost of GnRHa and gonadotrophin used was significantly higher in Group A (P = 0.043).
Single-dose long-acting GnRHa is as effective as daily dose short-acting GnRHa for pituitary desensitisation prior to controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF cycles.
促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRHa)——长效和短效——在体外受精(IVF)治疗中卵巢刺激前用于垂体降调节。然而,关于它们的有效性、随后卵巢刺激所需的促性腺激素剂量以及临床结局,文献中存在争议。
本研究的目的是比较单剂量长效GnRHa——戈舍瑞林——和每日剂量短效GnRHa——布舍瑞林——在IVF治疗中垂体降调节的疗效及其临床结局。
本前瞻性比较研究在尼日利亚一家公立三级医院阿布贾国立医院的IVF中心进行。总共114例IVF患者被连续分配到长效GnRHa——戈舍瑞林——单剂量3.6 mg组(A组)或短效GnRHa——布舍瑞林——每日0.5 mg组(B组),两组均在IVF治疗前周期的第21天开始用药。比较两组对垂体降调节的影响和治疗结局。
两组达到降调节所需时间(天)(22.6±4.3对26.1±8.0;P = 0.084)和使用的人绝经期促性腺激素(HMG)平均剂量数(57.7±13.7对54.2±16.7;P = 0.222)相似。虽然A组回收的卵母细胞数(9.9±6.7对7.2±5.0;P = 0.02)和受精的卵母细胞数(6.2±4.4对4.6±3.5;P = 0.04)显著更高,但两组的胚胎数(4.4±2.6对4.0±3.0;P = 0.850)和6周时的临床妊娠率(49.2%对43.6%;优势比1.249;置信区间 = 0.579 - 2.612;P = 0.578)无统计学显著差异。虽然B组的医院就诊次数显著更多(P = 0.0001)以及注射次数更多(P = 0.0001),但A组使用的GnRHa和促性腺激素平均成本显著更高(P = 0.043)。
在IVF周期中,单剂量长效GnRHa在控制性卵巢刺激前垂体脱敏方面与每日剂量短效GnRHa一样有效。