Suppr超能文献

Angus 育肥牛瘤胃、盲肠和粪便微生物组受饲料效率选择的影响。

The impact of feed efficiency selection on the ruminal, cecal, and fecal microbiomes of Angus steers from a commercial feedlot.

机构信息

Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.

Egg Safety and Quality Research Unit, Richard B. Russell Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Athens, GA.

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 2020 Jul 1;98(7). doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa230.

Abstract

Feed is the greatest cost of animal production, so reducing it is critical to increase producer profits. In ruminants, the microbial population within the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) is critical to nutrient digestion and absorption in both the rumen and the hindgut. The objective of this study was to determine the bacterial taxonomic profile of the rumen, cecum, and feces of feedlot steers at slaughter in order to link feed efficiency and the GIT bacterial populations from these three locations. Twenty commercial Angus steers were selected and divided into two groups according to their residual feed intake (RFI) classification determined during the feedlot-finishing period: high-RFI (n = 10) and low-RFI (n = 10). After the ruminal, cecal, and fecal samples were collected at slaughter, DNA extraction and 16S rRNA gene sequencing were performed on them to determine their bacterial composition. One-way ANOVA was performed on the animal performance data, alpha diversities, and bacterial abundances using RFI classification as the fixed effect. Overall, the ruminal bacterial population was the most different in terms of taxonomic profile compared with the cecal and fecal populations as revealed by beta diversity analysis (P < 0.001). Moreover, bacterial richness (Chao1) was greatest (P = 0.01) in the rumen of the high-RFI group compared with the low-RFI group. In contrast, bacterial richness and diversity in the intestinal environment showed that Chao1 was greater (P = 0.01) in the cecum, and the Shannon diversity index was greater in both the cecum and feces of low-RFI compared with high-RFI steers (P = 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively). Ruminococcaceae was more abundant in the low-RFI group in the cecum and feces (P = 0.01); fecal Bifidobacteriaceae was more abundant in high-RFI steers (P = 0.03). No correlations (P ≥ 0.13) between any ruminal bacterial family and RFI were detected; however, Ruminococcaceae, Mogibacteriaceae, Christensenellaceae, and BS11 were negatively correlated with RFI (P < 0.05) in the cecum and feces. Succinivibrionaceae in the cecum was positively correlated with RFI (P = 0.05), and fecal Bifidobacteriaceae was positively correlated with RFI (P = 0.03). Results collectively indicate that in addition to the ruminal bacteria, the lower gut bacterial population has a significant impact on feed efficiency and nutrient utilization in feedlot steers; therefore, the intestinal bacteria should also be considered when examining the basis of ruminant feed efficiency.

摘要

饲料是动物生产的最大成本,因此降低饲料成本对于提高生产者利润至关重要。在反刍动物中,胃肠道(GIT)内的微生物种群对瘤胃和后肠的营养消化和吸收至关重要。本研究的目的是确定屠宰时肥育场肉牛瘤胃、盲肠和粪便中的细菌分类群,以将饲料效率与来自这三个部位的 GIT 细菌群联系起来。选择了 20 头商业安格斯牛,并根据其在肥育场育肥期确定的残留饲料摄入量(RFI)分类分为两组:高 RFI(n = 10)和低 RFI(n = 10)。在屠宰时收集瘤胃、盲肠和粪便样本后,对其进行 DNA 提取和 16S rRNA 基因测序,以确定其细菌组成。使用 RFI 分类作为固定效应,对动物性能数据、alpha 多样性和细菌丰度进行单因素方差分析。总体而言,β多样性分析表明,与盲肠和粪便群体相比,瘤胃细菌群体在分类群方面差异最大(P < 0.001)。此外,高 RFI 组瘤胃的细菌丰富度(Chao1)最高(P = 0.01)。相比之下,肠道环境中的细菌丰富度和多样性表明,低 RFI 组盲肠的 Chao1 更大(P = 0.01),低 RFI 组盲肠和粪便的 Shannon 多样性指数更大(P = 0.01 和 P < 0.001)。在盲肠和粪便中,低 RFI 组的 Ruminococcaceae 更为丰富(P = 0.01);高 RFI 组粪便中的双歧杆菌科更为丰富(P = 0.03)。在瘤胃中,没有检测到任何瘤胃细菌科与 RFI 之间的相关性(P ≥ 0.13);然而,Ruminococcaceae、Mogibacteriaceae、Christensenellaceae 和 BS11 在盲肠和粪便中与 RFI 呈负相关(P < 0.05)。盲肠中的 Succinivibrionaceae 与 RFI 呈正相关(P = 0.05),粪便中的双歧杆菌科与 RFI 呈正相关(P = 0.03)。结果表明,除了瘤胃细菌外,下消化道细菌群对肥育场肉牛的饲料效率和养分利用有重大影响;因此,在研究反刍动物饲料效率的基础时,也应考虑肠道细菌。

相似文献

3
Predicting feed efficiency of Angus steers using the gastrointestinal microbiome.
Animal. 2024 Mar;18(3):101102. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101102. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
4
Rumen Microbiome and Metabolome of High and Low Residual Feed Intake Angus Heifers.
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Mar 25;9:812861. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.812861. eCollection 2022.
7
Fecal Microbiome Differences in Angus Steers with Differing Feed Efficiencies during the Feedlot-Finishing Phase.
Microorganisms. 2022 May 31;10(6):1128. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10061128.
8
Cecum microbial communities from steers differing in feed efficiency.
J Anim Sci. 2015 Nov;93(11):5327-40. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9415.
9
Cecal microbiota of feedlot cattle fed a four-species Bacillus supplement.
J Anim Sci. 2022 Oct 1;100(10). doi: 10.1093/jas/skac258.
10
Digestive tract microbiota of beef cattle that differed in feed efficiency.
J Anim Sci. 2020 Feb 1;98(2). doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa008.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the cecal microbial community associated with fat deposition in sheep and its possible pathways of action.
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Jul;13(7):e0148824. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01488-24. Epub 2025 May 22.
3
Life at the borderlands: microbiomes of interfaces critical to One Health.
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2024 Mar 1;48(2). doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuae008.
5
Rumen and fecal microbiomes are related to diet and production traits in beef cattle.
Front Microbiol. 2023 Dec 15;14:1282851. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1282851. eCollection 2023.
9
Dietary supplementation of modulates rumen-hindgut microbial community structure in Simmental calves.
Front Microbiol. 2023 Jun 7;14:1174740. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1174740. eCollection 2023.
10
Characterization of rumen, fecal, and milk microbiota in lactating dairy cows.
Front Microbiol. 2022 Sep 26;13:984119. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.984119. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the ruminal and fecal microbiotas in beef calves supplemented or not with concentrate.
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 13;15(4):e0231533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231533. eCollection 2020.
2
Digestive tract microbiota of beef cattle that differed in feed efficiency.
J Anim Sci. 2020 Feb 1;98(2). doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa008.
3
Analysis of the Rumen Microbiota of Beef Calves Supplemented During the Suckling Phase.
Front Microbiol. 2019 May 28;10:1131. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01131. eCollection 2019.
5
Deciphering Diversity Indices for a Better Understanding of Microbial Communities.
J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017 Dec 28;27(12):2089-2093. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1709.09027.
8
Reconciliation between operational taxonomic units and species boundaries.
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2017 Apr 1;93(4). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fix029.
9
Metatranscriptomic Profiling Reveals Linkages between the Active Rumen Microbiome and Feed Efficiency in Beef Cattle.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017 Apr 17;83(9). doi: 10.1128/AEM.00061-17. Print 2017 May 1.
10
New roles in hemicellulosic sugar fermentation for the uncultivated Bacteroidetes family BS11.
ISME J. 2017 Mar;11(3):691-703. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.150. Epub 2016 Dec 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验