• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在能力验证计划中鉴定 SARS-CoV-2。

Identification of SARS-CoV-2 in a Proficiency Testing Program.

机构信息

American Proficiency Institute, Traverse City, MI.

Michigan State University College of Natural Science, East Lansing.

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 2020 Sep 8;154(4):475-478. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa128.

DOI:10.1093/ajcp/aqaa128
PMID:32687172
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7454290/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

At the onset of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic in the United States, testing was limited to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-developed reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay. The urgent and massive demand for testing prompted swift development of assays to detect SARS-CoV-2. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of these newly developed tests.

METHODS

The American Proficiency Institute sent 2 test samples to 346 clinical laboratories in order to assess the accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 assays. The positive sample, containing 5,175 viral copies/mL, was fully extractable with SARS-CoV-2 viral capsid protein and RNA. The negative sample, with 3,951 viral copies/mL, contained recombinant virus particles with sequences for targeting human RNAase P gene sequences.

RESULTS

Of the laboratories submitting results, 97.4% (302/310) correctly detected the virus when present and 98.3% (296/301) correctly indicated when the virus was not present. Among incorrect results reported in this proficiency challenge, 76.9% (10/13) were likely related to clerical error. This accounts for 1.6% (10/611) of all reported results.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall performance in this SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection challenge was excellent, providing confidence in the results of these new molecular tests and assurance for the clinical and public health decisions based on these test results.

摘要

目的

在美国严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)大流行开始时,检测仅限于疾病控制与预防中心开发的逆转录聚合酶链反应检测。对检测的迫切和大量需求促使迅速开发了检测 SARS-CoV-2 的检测方法。本研究的目的是评估这些新开发的检测方法的准确性。

方法

美国能力研究所向 346 家临床实验室发送了 2 个测试样本,以评估 SARS-CoV-2 检测方法的准确性。阳性样本含有 5175 个病毒拷贝/mL,可完全提取 SARS-CoV-2 病毒衣壳蛋白和 RNA。阴性样本含有 3951 个病毒拷贝/mL,包含含有靶向人 RNAase P 基因序列的重组病毒颗粒。

结果

提交结果的实验室中,97.4%(302/310)在病毒存在时正确检测到病毒,98.3%(296/301)在病毒不存在时正确表明。在本次能力挑战中报告的错误结果中,76.9%(10/13)可能与文书错误有关。这占所有报告结果的 1.6%(10/611)。

结论

在这项 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 检测挑战中,整体表现非常出色,对这些新的分子检测结果充满信心,并保证了基于这些检测结果的临床和公共卫生决策的正确性。

相似文献

1
Identification of SARS-CoV-2 in a Proficiency Testing Program.在能力验证计划中鉴定 SARS-CoV-2。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2020 Sep 8;154(4):475-478. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa128.
2
Understanding, Verifying, and Implementing Emergency Use Authorization Molecular Diagnostics for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA.理解、验证和实施用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)核糖核酸的紧急使用授权分子诊断方法。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;58(8). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00796-20.
3
Validation and verification of the Abbott RealTime SARS-CoV-2 assay analytical and clinical performance.对 Abbott RealTime SARS-CoV-2 检测分析和临床性能的验证和确认。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104474. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104474. Epub 2020 May 28.
4
Nationwide External Quality Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Testing, South Korea.韩国全国范围内对 SARS-CoV-2 分子检测的外部质量评估。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;26(10):2353-2360. doi: 10.3201/eid2610.202551. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
5
Clinical Validation of a SARS-CoV-2 Real-Time Reverse Transcription PCR Assay Targeting the Nucleocapsid Gene.一种针对核衣壳基因的新型冠状病毒实时逆转录聚合酶链反应检测方法的临床验证
J Appl Lab Med. 2020 Sep 1;5(5):889-896. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfaa089.
6
Highly sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by multiplex rRT-PCR for molecular diagnosis of COVID-19 by clinical laboratories.临床实验室多重实时 RT-PCR 法用于分子诊断 COVID-19 的高灵敏度 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 检测
Clin Chim Acta. 2020 Aug;507:139-142. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.04.023. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
7
Multiplexing primer/probe sets for detection of SARS-CoV-2 by qRT-PCR.多重引物/探针用于实时 RT-PCR 检测 SARS-CoV-2。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104499. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104499. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
8
Analytical and Clinical Comparison of Three Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Detection.三种用于 SARS-CoV-2 检测的核酸扩增试验的分析与临床比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Aug 24;58(9). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01134-20.
9
Multi-center evaluation of cepheid xpert® xpress SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care test during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间赛沛 Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 即时检测的多中心评估。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Jul;128:104426. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104426. Epub 2020 May 11.
10
First results of a national external quality assessment scheme for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences.国家 SARS-CoV-2 基因组序列检测外部质量评估计划的初步结果。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104537. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104537. Epub 2020 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
External Quality Assessment (EQA) for SARS-CoV-2 RNA Point-of-Care Testing in Primary Healthcare Services: Analytical Performance over Seven EQA Cycles.基层医疗服务中SARS-CoV-2 RNA即时检测的外部质量评估:七个质量评估周期内的分析性能
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 May 26;14(11):1106. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14111106.
2
Comparison of fifteen SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification test assays used during the Canadian Laboratory Response Network's National SARS-CoV-2 Proficiency Program, May 2020 to June 2021.2020年5月至2021年6月期间,加拿大实验室反应网络国家新型冠状病毒2019冠状病毒病能力验证计划中使用的15种新型冠状病毒2019冠状病毒病核酸扩增检测方法的比较。
Can Commun Dis Rep. 2023 May 1;49(5):180-189. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v49i05a03.
3
Development of a national proficiency test for SARS-CoV-2 detection by PCR in Colombia.哥伦比亚开发用于聚合酶链反应检测 SARS-CoV-2 的全国能力验证测试。
J Glob Health. 2023 Oct 13;13:06029. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.06029.
4
The Coronavirus Standards Working Group's roadmap for improved population testing.冠状病毒标准工作组关于改进人群检测的路线图。
Nat Biotechnol. 2022 Nov;40(11):1563-1568. doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01538-1.
5
Evaluation of factors contributing to variability of qualitative and quantitative proficiency testing for SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid detection.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)核酸检测定性和定量能力验证变异性影响因素评估
Biosaf Health. 2022 Oct;4(5):321-329. doi: 10.1016/j.bsheal.2022.08.004. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
6
First Results of an External Quality Assessment (EQA) Scheme for Molecular, Serological and Antigenic Diagnostic Test for SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Lombardy Region (Northern Italy), 2020-2022.2020 - 2022年意大利北部伦巴第地区针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)检测的分子、血清学和抗原诊断测试外部质量评估(EQA)计划的初步结果
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jun 16;12(6):1483. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12061483.
7
Clinical Evaluation of a New Antigen-Based COVID-19 Rapid Diagnostic Test from Symptomatic Patients.对有症状患者使用新型基于抗原的新冠病毒快速诊断测试的临床评估
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Dec 8;11(12):2300. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11122300.
8
Use of emerging testing technologies and approaches for SARS-CoV-2: review of literature and global experience in an Australian context.新兴检测技术和方法在 SARS-CoV-2 中的应用:澳大利亚背景下的文献综述和全球经验。
Pathology. 2021 Oct;53(6):689-699. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2021.08.001. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
9
Prediction of False-Positive Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Molecular Results in a High-Throughput Open-Platform System.高通量开放式平台系统中假阳性严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)分子检测结果的预测。
J Mol Diagn. 2021 Sep;23(9):1085-1096. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.05.015. Epub 2021 Jun 8.

本文引用的文献

1
The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2.严重急性呼吸综合征相关冠状病毒:将 2019-nCoV 进行分类并命名为 SARS-CoV-2。
Nat Microbiol. 2020 Apr;5(4):536-544. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0695-z. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
2
First Case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in the United States.美国首例 2019 新型冠状病毒病例。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):929-936. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001191. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
3
The ability of participant laboratories to detect penicillin-resistant Pneumococci. A report from the microbiology portion of the College of American Pathologists (CAP) surveys.参与实验室检测耐青霉素肺炎球菌的能力。美国病理学家学会(CAP)调查微生物学部分的一份报告。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1982 Oct;78(4 Suppl):659-63.
4
Special topics in antimicrobial susceptibility testing: test accuracy against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, pneumococci, and the sensitivity of beta-lactamase methods.抗菌药物敏感性试验专题:针对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌、肺炎球菌的检测准确性以及β-内酰胺酶检测方法的敏感性
Am J Clin Pathol. 1983 Oct;80(4 Suppl):609-14.