J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2020 Jul 1;57(4):246-250. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20200428-01.
To determine retinal sensitivity and fixation in children with anisometropic amblyopia using macular analyzer integrity assessment (MAIA) microperimetry (CenterVue).
Amblyopic and non-amblyopic eyes of 39 children with the diagnosis of anisometropic amblyopia were compared using MAIA microperimetry in terms of average threshold, fixation indexes (P1 and P2), and bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA) for 95% and 63% of points. The correlations between visual acuity and microperimetry parameters were also analyzed.
The mean average threshold was 26.6 ± 5.9 dB for amblyopic eyes and 28.6 ± 1.9 dB for fellow eyes (P = .003). The mean P1 index was 80.2% ± 20.3% for amblyopic eyes and 87.6% ± 8.7% for fellow eyes (P = .032). The mean P2 index was 92.5% ± 9.6% and 94.3% ± 4.8% for amblyopic eyes and fellow eyes, respectively. The mean BCEA95 value was 12.9 ± 17.2 and 9.4 ± 8.2 and the mean BCEA63 value was 4.4 ± 5.6 and 3.1 ± 2.7 for amblyopic eyes and fellow eyes, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found for those parameters (P > .05).
Retinal sensitivity and P1 fixation index were significantly lower in amblyopic eyes compared to non-amblyopic eyes. Because measuring visual acuity does not represent all functions of the visual system, microperimetric evaluation may give extra information about total visual function of amblyopic eyes. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2020;57(4):246-250.].
使用黄斑分析仪完整性评估(MAIA)微视野计(CenterVue)评估屈光不正性弱视儿童的视网膜敏感度和固视点。
对 39 例屈光不正性弱视儿童的弱视眼和非弱视眼进行 MAIA 微视野计检查,比较平均阈值、固视点指数(P1 和 P2)和 95%和 63%的双变量轮廓椭圆面积(BCEA)。还分析了视力与微视野参数之间的相关性。
弱视眼的平均平均阈值为 26.6 ± 5.9dB,对侧眼为 28.6 ± 1.9dB(P =.003)。弱视眼的 P1 指数平均值为 80.2%±20.3%,对侧眼为 87.6%±8.7%(P =.032)。弱视眼和对侧眼的 P2 指数平均值分别为 92.5%±9.6%和 94.3%±4.8%。弱视眼和对侧眼的 BCEA95 平均值分别为 12.9±17.2 和 9.4±8.2,BCEA63 平均值分别为 4.4±5.6 和 3.1±2.7。这些参数之间无统计学差异(P >.05)。
与非弱视眼相比,弱视眼的视网膜敏感度和 P1 固视点指数明显较低。因为测量视力并不能代表视觉系统的所有功能,微视野计评估可能会提供关于弱视眼总视觉功能的额外信息。