Abboud Marcus, McEnhill Sinead, Orentlicher Gary
Adjunct Professor, College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Clinical Director of Private Practice specializing in Dental Implants and Facial Esthetics, Enniskillen, County Fermanagh, Northern Ireland; Fellow, International College of Dentists.
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2020 Jul/Aug;41(7):362-366; quiz 367.
Digital implant workflows are facilitating new and more accurate methods of implant treatment planning when compared to conventional analog techniques. The placement of implants using guided surgery presents multiple benefits for immediately restoring a patient functionally and esthetically with a provisional restoration. Although digital technology enables efficiency and enhanced accuracy for dental implant treatments, some cases may require the use of a hybrid workflow that employs both conventional and digital procedures, as some limitations to a fully digital approach exist depending on the clinical situation. This article presents several different implant treatment scenarios and discusses whether a fully digital workflow is possible and/or beneficial in each situation. The scenarios describe the full-treatment sequence for immediately loaded implants, allowing a direct comparison of various restorative and surgical implant workflows.
与传统的模拟技术相比，数字化种植流程正在推动新的、更精确的种植治疗计划方法。使用引导手术植入种植体具有多种益处，可通过临时修复立即在功能和美学上恢复患者的状态。尽管数字技术提高了牙种植治疗的效率和准确性，但某些情况下可能需要采用结合传统和数字程序的混合流程，因为根据临床情况，全数字化方法存在一些局限性。本文介绍了几种不同的种植治疗方案，并讨论了在每种情况下全数字化流程是否可行和/或有益。这些方案描述了即刻负重种植体的完整治疗序列，便于直接比较各种修复和手术种植流程。
