Medlyn Belinda, Barrett Damian, Landsberg Joe, Sands Peter, Clement Robert
School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. Corresponding author; email:
CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Funct Plant Biol. 2003 Feb;30(2):153-169. doi: 10.1071/FP02088.
A fundamental component of most models of terrestrial carbon balance is an estimate of plant canopy photosynthetic uptake driven by radiation interception by the canopy. In this article, we review approaches used to model the conversion of radiation into photosynthate. As this process is well understood at the leaf-scale, the modelling problem is essentially one of up-scaling, to canopy, regional or global scale. Our review therefore focuses on issues of scaling, including model identification, parameterisation and validation at large scales. Four different approaches are commonly taken to modelling photosynthate production at large scales: the maximum productivity, resource-use efficiency, big-leaf, and sun-shade models. Models representing each of these approaches are discussed and model predictions compared with estimates of gross primary productivity derived from eddy covariance data measured above a Sitka spruce forest. The sun-shade model was found to perform best at all time scales considered. However, other models had significant advantages including simplicity of implementation and the ability to combine the model with remotely-sensed information on vegetation radiation interception. We conclude that all four approaches can be successfully used to model photosynthetic uptake and that the best approach in a given situation will depend on model objectives and data availability.
大多数陆地碳平衡模型的一个基本组成部分是对由冠层辐射截获驱动的植物冠层光合吸收的估计。在本文中,我们回顾了用于模拟辐射转化为光合产物的方法。由于这个过程在叶片尺度上已被充分理解,建模问题本质上是一个向上扩展到冠层、区域或全球尺度的问题。因此,我们的综述重点关注尺度问题,包括大尺度下的模型识别、参数化和验证。通常采用四种不同的方法来对大尺度下的光合产物生产进行建模:最大生产力模型、资源利用效率模型、大叶模型和阴阳叶模型。我们讨论了代表每种方法的模型,并将模型预测结果与从锡特卡云杉林上方测量的涡度协方差数据得出的总初级生产力估计值进行了比较。发现在所有考虑的时间尺度上,阴阳叶模型表现最佳。然而,其他模型也有显著优势,包括实施简单以及能够将模型与植被辐射截获的遥感信息相结合。我们得出结论,所有这四种方法都可以成功地用于模拟光合吸收,在给定情况下的最佳方法将取决于模型目标和数据可用性。