Altwaim Bashaer, Salama Fouad, Alogayyel Shahad
Department of Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Department of Clinical Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Detroit Mercy, Detroit, Michigan, USA, Phone: +1 313-494-6877, e-mail:
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 May 1;21(5):543-548.
To assess the influence of three probiotic mouthrinses on the microhardness of three esthetic materials used for teeth restorations.
Thirty specimens of each material: conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC), resin-modified glass ionomer, and resin composite were randomly assigned to three groups. Surface microhardness was measured at baseline. The specimens were immersed in probiotic mouthrinses, group I: (P2 probiotic power), group II: (Probioclean), and group III (BōKU natural). Microhardness was measured after 21 and 63 minutes of immersion which is comparable with 3 and 9 weeks of mouthrinse use every day, respectively. Measurements of microhardness were completed using Micro Vickers testing machine with a 200 g load applied for a duration of 15 seconds.
The microhardness change of the three restorative materials reveled statistically significant differences in all mouthrinse groups ( = 0.001). BōKU natural mouthrinse decreased microhardness significantly in all restorative materials ( < 0.05). However, Probioclean mouthrinse was associated with an increase in microhardness in all restorative materials. The effect of P2 probiotic power mouthrinse varied depending on time cycles and the restorative material. The mean difference in mouthrinse groups of resin composite was highest in BōKU natural at immersion time of 63 minutes. While no mean difference was seen in P2 probiotic power group at immersion time of 21 minutes which had no effect on the microhardness of resin composite.
Surface microhardness was affected by immersion in probiotic mouthrinses. The BōKU natural mouthrinse had the highest reduction, while resin composite showed the least change in surface microhardness.
There is lack of studies that investigated the effect of probiotics mouthrinses on the surface properties of restorative materials. This study showed evidence that some of the tested probiotic mouthrinses in this study decreased the microhardness of the tested tooth-colored restorative materials after immersion for 21 and 63 minutes which is equivalent to 3 and 9 weeks of everyday use.
评估三种益生菌漱口水对用于牙齿修复的三种美学材料显微硬度的影响。
每种材料制备30个样本:传统玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)、树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀和树脂复合材料,并随机分为三组。在基线时测量表面显微硬度。将样本浸入益生菌漱口水,第一组:(P2益生菌活力),第二组:(Probioclean),第三组(BōKU天然型)。在浸入21分钟和63分钟后测量显微硬度,这分别相当于每天使用漱口水3周和9周的情况。使用显微维氏硬度测试机完成显微硬度测量,施加200克载荷,持续15秒。
在所有漱口水组中,三种修复材料的显微硬度变化均显示出统计学上的显著差异(P = 0.001)。BōKU天然型漱口水使所有修复材料的显微硬度显著降低(P < 0.05)。然而,Probioclean漱口水使所有修复材料的显微硬度增加。P2益生菌活力漱口水的效果因时间周期和修复材料而异。在63分钟浸入时间时,树脂复合材料在BōKU天然型漱口水组中的平均差异最高。而在21分钟浸入时间时,P2益生菌活力组未见平均差异,其对树脂复合材料的显微硬度无影响。
浸入益生菌漱口水会影响表面显微硬度。BōKU天然型漱口水的降低幅度最大,而树脂复合材料的表面显微硬度变化最小。
缺乏关于益生菌漱口水对修复材料表面性能影响的研究。本研究表明,在本研究中,一些测试的益生菌漱口水在浸入21分钟和63分钟后(相当于每天使用3周和9周)降低了测试的牙齿颜色修复材料的显微硬度。