不同修复材料和牙釉质表面粗糙度和显微硬度的益生菌溶液的比较评价。
Comparative evaluation of probiotic solutions on surface roughness and microhardness of different restorative materials and enamel.
机构信息
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Nuh Naci Yazgan University, 38170 Kayseri, Turkey.
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Nuh Naci Yazgan University, 38170 Kayseri, Turkey.
出版信息
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 May;48(3):107-119. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2024.064. Epub 2024 May 3.
This research study aimed to investigate the impact of probiotic mouthwash and kefir on the surface characteristics, specifically surface roughness and microhardness, of different restorative materials, as well as permanent and deciduous tooth enamels. Thirty disc-shaped specimens were prepared from composite resin (G-ænial Posterior (GP)), polyacid-modified composite resin (compomer) (Dyract-XP (DXP)), and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Ionoseal (IS)). Additionally, thirty specimens of enamel were obtained from permanent teeth (PT) and thirty from deciduous teeth (DT) by embedding buccal and lingual sections, acquired through vertical sectioning of 15 permanent and 15 deciduous human tooth crowns in the mesiodistal orientation within acrylic resin blocks. The specimens were then categorized into three distinct groups and immersed for 14 days in one of the following solutions: distilled water, kefir or probiotic mouthwash. The mean surface roughness values of all specimens were assessed using an atomic force microscope, while the mean surface microhardness was measured using a Vickers hardness measuring instrument. The results revealed a statistically significant difference in mean surface roughness among the various restorative materials ( < 0.001). Among the restorative materials, the IS material exhibited notably higher mean surface roughness values than other restorative materials and tooth enamel, while no significant differences were observed between the PT and DT groups. Importantly, the main effect of the solutions under investigation was not statistically significant ( = 0.208). No significant difference was found between the surface roughness values of specimens subjected to the different solutions. When evaluating the effects of materials and solutions on microhardness, the main effects of material and solution variables and the influence of material-solution interactions were statistically significant ( < 0.001). Taken together, these results indicate that consistent use of kefir or probiotic mouthwashes may impact the surface properties of various restorative materials and tooth enamel.
本研究旨在探讨益生菌漱口水和克菲尔对不同修复材料表面特性(特别是表面粗糙度和显微硬度)的影响,以及对恒牙和乳牙釉质的影响。从复合树脂(G-ænial Posterior(GP))、多酸改性复合树脂(复合体)(Dyract-XP(DXP))和树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(Ionoseal(IS))中制备了 30 个圆盘状样本。此外,通过在丙烯酸树脂块中以近远中方向垂直切割 15 个恒牙和 15 个乳牙的牙冠,获得了 30 个来自恒牙(PT)和 30 个来自乳牙(DT)的釉质样本。然后,将样本分为三组,在以下溶液中浸泡 14 天:蒸馏水、克菲尔或益生菌漱口水。使用原子力显微镜评估所有样本的平均表面粗糙度值,使用维氏硬度测量仪测量平均表面显微硬度。结果显示,不同修复材料之间的平均表面粗糙度值存在统计学显著差异(<0.001)。在修复材料中,IS 材料的平均表面粗糙度值明显高于其他修复材料和牙釉质,而 PT 和 DT 组之间没有观察到显著差异。重要的是,研究中调查的溶液的主要效应没有统计学意义(=0.208)。在不同溶液处理的样本之间未发现表面粗糙度值有显著差异。在评估材料和溶液对显微硬度的影响时,材料和溶液变量的主要效应以及材料-溶液相互作用的影响具有统计学意义(<0.001)。综上所述,这些结果表明,持续使用克菲尔或益生菌漱口水可能会影响各种修复材料和牙釉质的表面特性。