• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump for Cardiogenic Shock-Reply.

作者信息

Dhruva Sanket S, Mortazavi Bobak J, Desai Nihar R

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco.

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station.

出版信息

JAMA. 2020 Jul 21;324(3):303-304. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7560.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2020.7560
PMID:32692385
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump for Cardiogenic Shock-Reply.血管内微轴左心室辅助装置与主动脉内球囊反搏治疗心源性休克的回复
JAMA. 2020 Jul 21;324(3):303-304. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7560.
2
Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump for Cardiogenic Shock.血管内微轴左心室辅助装置与主动脉内球囊反搏治疗心源性休克的比较
JAMA. 2020 Jul 21;324(3):303. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7551.
3
Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump for Cardiogenic Shock.
JAMA. 2020 Jul 21;324(3):302-303. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7557.
4
[Cochrane Corner: Intra-aortic balloon pump in patients with cardiogenic shock following myocardial infarction].[Cochrane 角落：心肌梗死后心源性休克患者的主动脉内球囊反搏]
Rev Port Cardiol. 2016 Apr;35(4):229-31. doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2015.09.013. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
5
A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction.一项随机临床试验，旨在评估经皮左心室辅助装置与主动脉内球囊反搏治疗心肌梗死所致心源性休克的安全性和有效性。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Nov 4;52(19):1584-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.065.
6
[Percutaneous insertion of a left ventricular assist device for cardiogenic shock in a patient with a myocardial infarction].[心肌梗死患者心源性休克时经皮插入左心室辅助装置]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003 Jan 25;147(4):164-6.
7
Successful combined use of Impella Recover 2.5 device and intra-aortic balloon pump support in cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction.成功联合使用 Impella Recover 2.5 装置和主动脉内球囊泵支持治疗急性心肌梗死后的心源性休克。
ASAIO J. 2010 Nov-Dec;56(6):519-21. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e3181f7478e.
8
The use of an implantable left ventricular assist device in a patient with cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后心源性休克患者植入式左心室辅助装置的应用。
Int J Cardiol. 1998 Sep 1;66(1):55-8. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5273(98)00186-7.
9
Long-term survival using intra-aortic balloon pump and percutaneous right ventricular assist device for biventricular mechanical support of cardiogenic shock.使用主动脉内球囊泵和经皮右心室辅助装置对心源性休克进行双心室机械支持的长期生存情况。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2008 Jul;20(7):E205-7.
10
The successful combined use of Impella LP 2.5 and intra-aortic balloon pump in ST-elevation myocardial infarction with refractory cardiogenic shock.Impella LP 2.5与主动脉内球囊反搏在ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并难治性心源性休克中的成功联合应用。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2012 Aug;13(8):531-2. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e3283569b51.

引用本文的文献

1
High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction deemed not suitable for surgical revascularisation. A clinical consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) in collaboration with the ESC Working Group on Cardiovascular Surgery.左心室射血分数降低且被认为不适合外科血运重建的患者的高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。欧洲经皮心血管介入协会（EAPCI）与欧洲心脏病学会心血管外科工作组合作发布的临床共识声明。
EuroIntervention. 2025 Jan 6;21(1):22-34. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-01100.
2
Mechanical Support Strategies for High-Risk Procedures in the Invasive Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: A State-of-the-Art Review.侵入性心脏导管实验室高风险手术的机械支持策略：最新综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 18;12(24):7755. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247755.
3
Outcomes of mechanical circulatory support for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.机械循环支持治疗急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克的疗效。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;99(3):658-663. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29834. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
4
Impella in cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急性心肌梗死后心原性休克患者应用 Impella：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2020 Dec;132(23-24):716-725. doi: 10.1007/s00508-020-01712-y. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
5
Long-term mortality and costs following use of Impella® for mechanical circulatory support: a population-based cohort study.使用 Impella® 进行机械循环支持后的长期死亡率和成本：基于人群的队列研究。
Can J Anaesth. 2020 Dec;67(12):1728-1737. doi: 10.1007/s12630-020-01755-9. Epub 2020 Jul 15.