Suppr超能文献

接近生命末期的有精神能力损害的成人研究中的同意过程:系统评价和透明的专家咨询(MORECare_Capacity 声明)。

Processes of consent in research for adults with impaired mental capacity nearing the end of life: systematic review and transparent expert consultation (MORECare_Capacity statement).

机构信息

Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK.

Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton General Hospital, Brighton, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med. 2020 Jul 22;18(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01654-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Involving adults lacking capacity (ALC) in research on end of life care (EoLC) or serious illness is important, but often omitted. We aimed to develop evidence-based guidance on how best to include individuals with impaired capacity nearing the end of life in research, by identifying the challenges and solutions for processes of consent across the capacity spectrum.

METHODS

Methods Of Researching End of Life Care_Capacity (MORECare_C) furthers the MORECare statement on research evaluating EoLC. We used simultaneous methods of systematic review and transparent expert consultation (TEC). The systematic review involved four electronic databases searches. The eligibility criteria identified studies involving adults with serious illness and impaired capacity, and methods for recruitment in research, implementing the research methods, and exploring public attitudes. The TEC involved stakeholder consultation to discuss and generate recommendations, and a Delphi survey and an expert 'think-tank' to explore consensus. We narratively synthesised the literature mapping processes of consent with recruitment outcomes, solutions, and challenges. We explored recommendation consensus using descriptive statistics. Synthesis of all the findings informed the guidance statement.

RESULTS

Of the 5539 articles identified, 91 met eligibility. The studies encompassed people with dementia (27%) and in palliative care (18%). Seventy-five percent used observational designs. Studies on research methods (37 studies) focused on processes of proxy decision-making, advance consent, and deferred consent. Studies implementing research methods (30 studies) demonstrated the role of family members as both proxy decision-makers and supporting decision-making for the person with impaired capacity. The TEC involved 43 participants who generated 29 recommendations, with consensus that indicated. Key areas were the timeliness of the consent process and maximising an individual's decisional capacity. The think-tank (n = 19) refined equivocal recommendations including supporting proxy decision-makers, training practitioners, and incorporating legislative frameworks.

CONCLUSIONS

The MORECare_C statement details 20 solutions to recruit ALC nearing the EoL in research. The statement provides much needed guidance to enrol individuals with serious illness in research. Key is involving family members early and designing study procedures to accommodate variable and changeable levels of capacity. The statement demonstrates the ethical imperative and processes of recruiting adults across the capacity spectrum in varying populations and settings.

摘要

背景

让缺乏能力的成年人(ALC)参与生命末期护理(EoLC)或严重疾病的研究非常重要,但往往被忽略。我们旨在通过确定在整个能力范围内同意过程的挑战和解决方案,为如何最好地将接近生命末期的能力受损个体纳入研究提供循证指导。

方法

研究生命末期护理能力的方法(MORECare_C)进一步阐述了 MORECare 关于评估生命末期护理的研究声明。我们使用了系统评价和透明专家咨询(TEC)的同时方法。系统评价涉及四项电子数据库搜索。入选标准确定了涉及患有严重疾病和能力受损的成年人的研究,以及研究招募、实施研究方法以及探索公众态度的方法。TEC 涉及利益相关者咨询,以讨论和生成建议,并进行了德尔菲调查和专家“智囊团”以探索共识。我们通过叙述性综合文献,将同意过程与招募结果、解决方案和挑战联系起来。我们使用描述性统计探索了建议共识。所有发现的综合信息为指导声明提供了信息。

结果

在确定的 5539 篇文章中,有 91 篇符合入选标准。这些研究涵盖了痴呆症患者(27%)和姑息治疗患者(18%)。75%的研究使用观察性设计。研究方法研究(37 项研究)侧重于代理决策、事先同意和延期同意的过程。实施研究方法的研究(30 项研究)展示了家庭成员作为代理人和支持能力受损者决策的双重作用。TEC 涉及 43 名参与者,他们生成了 29 项建议,并达成了共识。关键领域是同意过程的及时性和最大限度地提高个人的决策能力。智囊团(n=19)改进了模棱两可的建议,包括支持代理人、培训从业人员和纳入立法框架。

结论

MORECare_C 声明详细说明了 20 种在生命末期招募 ALC 参与研究的解决方案。该声明为招募患有严重疾病的个体参与研究提供了急需的指导。关键是尽早让家庭成员参与进来,并设计研究程序,以适应不同能力水平的变化。该声明展示了在不同人群和环境中,在整个能力范围内招募成年人参与研究的伦理必要性和过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20e8/7374835/555e08ac6ef0/12916_2020_1654_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验