• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人健康促进的良好实践——对健康政策证据的意义。

Good practices in health promotion for older people - Significance for evidence in health policy.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

Department of Health Economics and Social Security, Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Community. 2021 Mar;29(2):404-415. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13100. Epub 2020 Jul 22.

DOI:10.1111/hsc.13100
PMID:32697009
Abstract

This article is devoted to convincing policy makers to use good practices in encouraging older people to pursue adequate and effective health policies. Long-term scientific research focused on the effects of health promotion programmes is rarely undertaken, although its scope is still expanding. At the same time, it is strongly desirable to form health policy based on scientific evidence. In this situation, an indication of good practices characterised by precisely defined features and their systematic evaluation could be an alternative to an insufficient number of empirical studies. The first step of the methodology was a literature review on health promotion for older people, aimed at defining good practices and criteria used for their selection. The authors searched the following databases: PubMED, Embase and Cochrane Library, as well as international databases dedicated to health promotion programmes for older people (e.g. Age-friendly World (https://extranet.who.int/agefriendlyworld/age-friendly-practice-database-launched); HealthProElderly (www.healthproelderly.com/database/index.php?id=16); JA-CHRODIS (www.chrodis.eu); EuroHealthNet (www.eurohealthnet.eu) and ProFouND; (www.profound.eu.com). As relevant health policy information is usually available in national languages, the authors then approached national experts in 10 European countries, who filled in a dedicated survey on health promotion programmes for older people and indicated examples of good practices from their countries. Practical evidence, based on real implemented programmes, is valuable as inspiration for health promotion programmes, their planning and management. Selecting good practices from among implemented and evaluated actions makes it possible to establish their value. The significance of good practices in health promotion is to deliver real benefits and health effects for a target group, which, in the case of evident benefits, renders the practices credible and worthy of further dissemination. The EU already successfully shares good practices in migrant health and environmental protection. Creating databases on good practices helps policy makers promote the sustainability of already implemented activities and enhances their applicability by other organisations and in different settings.

摘要

本文致力于说服政策制定者在鼓励老年人制定充分和有效的健康政策方面采用良好做法。尽管健康促进计划的长期科学研究范围仍在扩大,但很少进行长期科学研究。与此同时,基于科学证据制定健康政策是非常可取的。在这种情况下,以明确规定的特征为特征并对其进行系统评估的良好做法的指示,可以替代数量不足的经验研究。该方法的第一步是对老年人健康促进进行文献回顾,旨在定义良好做法和用于选择良好做法的标准。作者检索了以下数据库:PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Library,以及专门针对老年人健康促进计划的国际数据库(例如,Age-friendly World(https://extranet.who.int/agefriendlyworld/age-friendly-practice-database-launched);HealthProElderly(www.healthproelderly.com/database/index.php?id=16);JA-CHRODIS(www.chrodis.eu);EuroHealthNet(www.eurohealthnet.eu)和 ProFouND(www.profound.eu.com)。由于相关健康政策信息通常以本国语言提供,因此作者随后联系了 10 个欧洲国家的本国专家,他们填写了一份关于老年人健康促进计划的专门调查,并从本国选择了良好实践的示例。基于实际实施计划的实践证据对于健康促进计划、其规划和管理具有启发价值。从已实施和评估的行动中选择良好实践,可以确定其价值。健康促进中良好实践的重要性在于为目标群体带来实际利益和健康效果,在明显利益的情况下,使实践具有可信度和值得进一步传播。欧盟已经成功地在移民健康和环境保护方面共享良好做法。创建良好实践数据库有助于政策制定者促进已经实施的活动的可持续性,并通过其他组织和不同环境提高其适用性。

相似文献

1
Good practices in health promotion for older people - Significance for evidence in health policy.老年人健康促进的良好实践——对健康政策证据的意义。
Health Soc Care Community. 2021 Mar;29(2):404-415. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13100. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Institutional analysis of health promotion for older people in Europe - concept and research tool.欧洲老年人健康促进的制度分析——概念与研究工具
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 5;16 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):327. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1516-1.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Fostering the Quality of Care for People with Chronic Diseases, from Theory to Practice: The Development of Good Practices in Disease Prevention and Care in JA CHRODIS PLUS Using JA CHRODIS Recommendations and Quality Criteria.促进慢性病患者的护理质量,从理论到实践:在 JA CHRODIS PLUS 中使用 JA CHRODIS 建议和质量标准制定疾病预防和护理方面的良好实践。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 4;17(3):951. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030951.
6
Culture of Care: Organizational Responsibilities关怀文化:组织职责
7
Non-pharmacological interventions for sleep promotion in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房促进睡眠的非药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 6;2015(10):CD008808. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008808.pub2.
8
[EU-Project "healthPROelderly" - evidence-based guidelines on health promotion for older people: social determinants, inequality and sustainability].[欧盟项目“健康促进老年人健康(healthPROelderly)”——老年人健康促进的循证指南:社会决定因素、不平等与可持续性]
Prof Inferm. 2009 Jul-Sep;62(3):149-60.
9
Policy interventions implemented through sporting organisations for promoting healthy behaviour change.通过体育组织实施的促进健康行为改变的政策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18(2):CD004809. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004809.pub2.
10
The added value of using the HEPA PAT for physical activity policy monitoring: a four-country comparison.使用高效空气过滤器身体活动追踪器进行身体活动政策监测的附加值:四国比较
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Feb 15;19(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00681-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators in the implementation of an evidence-based health promotion intervention in a primary care setting: a qualitative study.在基层医疗环境中实施基于证据的健康促进干预的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
J Health Organ Manag. 2021 Sep 2;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print):349-67. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-12-2020-0512.