• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用中国国家 EQAS 数据和符合生物学变异数据质量评估清单(BIVAC)的出版物研究淋巴细胞亚群计数的总误差规范。

Study of total error specifications of lymphocyte subsets enumeration using China National EQAS data and Biological Variation Data Critical Appraisal Checklist (BIVAC)-compliant publications.

机构信息

National Center for Clinical Laboratories, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, P.R. China.

Beijing Engineering Research Center of Laboratory Medicine, Beijing, P.R. China.

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jul 22;59(1):179-186. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0741.

DOI:10.1515/cclm-2020-0741
PMID:32697751
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

It is important to select proper quality specifications for laboratories and external quality assessment (EQA) providers for their quality control and assessment. The aim of this study is to produce new total error (TE) specifications for lymphocyte subset enumeration by analyzing the allowable TE using EQAS data and comparing them with that based on reliable biological variation (BV).

METHODS

A total of 54,400 results from 1,716 laboratories were collected from China National EQAS for lymphocyte subset enumeration during the period 2017-2019. The EQA data were grouped according to lower limits of reference intervals for establishing concentration-dependent specifications. The TE value that 80% of laboratories can achieve were considered as TE specifications based on state of the art. The BV studies compliant with Biological Variation Data Critical Appraisal Checklist (BIVAC) were used to calculate the three levels of TE specifications. Then these TE specifications were compared for determining the recommended TE specifications.

RESULTS

Four parameters whose quality specifications could achieve the optimum criteria were as follows: the percentages of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ (high concentration) and CD3-CD16/56+ cells, and the absolute count of CD3-CD16/56+ cells. Only the TE specifications of CD3-CD19+ cells could achieve the minimum criteria. The TE specifications of remaining parameters should reach the desirable criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

New TE specifications were established by combining the EQA data and reliable BV data, which could help laboratories to apply proper criteria for continuous improvement of quality control, and EQA providers to use robust acceptance limits for better evaluation of EQAS results.

摘要

目的

为了进行质量控制和评估,为实验室和外部质量评估(EQA)提供者选择适当的质量规范非常重要。本研究的目的是通过分析 EQAS 数据中允许的总误差(TE)并将其与基于可靠生物学变异(BV)的 TE 进行比较,为淋巴细胞亚群计数制定新的总误差(TE)规范。

方法

本研究共收集了 2017 年至 2019 年期间中国国家 EQAS 用于淋巴细胞亚群计数的 1716 个实验室的 54400 个结果。根据建立浓度依赖性规范的参考区间下限,将 EQA 数据进行分组。将 80%的实验室能够达到的 TE 值作为基于现有技术的 TE 规范。使用符合生物学变异数据关键评估清单(BIVAC)的 BV 研究来计算三个级别的 TE 规范。然后,比较这些 TE 规范以确定推荐的 TE 规范。

结果

有四个参数的质量规范可以达到最佳标准:CD3+、CD3+CD4+(高浓度)和 CD3-CD16/56+细胞的百分比,以及 CD3-CD16/56+细胞的绝对计数。只有 CD3-CD19+细胞的 TE 规范可以达到最低标准。其余参数的 TE 规范应达到理想标准。

结论

通过结合 EQA 数据和可靠的 BV 数据,建立了新的 TE 规范,这有助于实验室应用适当的标准进行质量控制的持续改进,也有助于 EQA 提供者使用稳健的验收限来更好地评估 EQAS 结果。

相似文献

1
Study of total error specifications of lymphocyte subsets enumeration using China National EQAS data and Biological Variation Data Critical Appraisal Checklist (BIVAC)-compliant publications.使用中国国家 EQAS 数据和符合生物学变异数据质量评估清单(BIVAC)的出版物研究淋巴细胞亚群计数的总误差规范。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jul 22;59(1):179-186. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0741.
2
Total error in lymphocyte subpopulations by flow cytometry-based in state of the art using Spanish EQAS data.基于西班牙室间质量评价数据的流式细胞术检测淋巴细胞亚群的总误差。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2023 Aug 7;62(2):312-321. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2023-0470. Print 2024 Jan 26.
3
Biological variability of lymphocyte subsets of human adults' blood.成人血液淋巴细胞亚群的生物学变异性。
Clin Chim Acta. 2013 Sep 23;424:159-63. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
4
State of the art vs biological variability: Comparison on hematology parameters using Spanish EQAS data.现状与生物学变异性:利用西班牙 EQAS 数据比较血液学参数。
Int J Lab Hematol. 2018 Jun;40(3):284-291. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.12783. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
5
Biological variation data for lipid cardiovascular risk assessment biomarkers. A systematic review applying the biological variation data critical appraisal checklist (BIVAC).脂质心血管风险评估生物标志物的生物学变异数据。应用生物学变异数据关键评估清单(BIVAC)的系统评价。
Clin Chim Acta. 2019 Aug;495:467-475. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.05.013. Epub 2019 May 16.
6
Analytical quality specifications for reference methods and operating specifications for networks of reference laboratories. discussion paper from the members of the external quality assessment (EQA) Working Group B1) on target values in EQAS.参考方法的分析质量规范及参考实验室网络的操作规范。外部质量评估(EQA)B1工作组成员关于EQAS中目标值的讨论文件。
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1995 Dec;33(12):949-57.
7
Flow cytometric lymphocyte subset enumeration: 10 years of external quality assessment in the Benelux countries.流式细胞术淋巴细胞亚群计数:比荷卢三国10年的外部质量评估
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2008 Mar;74(2):79-90. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.20370.
8
Study of the analytical performance at different concentrations of hematological parameters using Spanish EQAS data.使用西班牙 EQAS 数据研究不同浓度血液学参数的分析性能。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019 Nov 26;57(12):1980-1987. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2019-0108.
9
Comparison of the results from two different External Quality Assessment Schemes supports the utility of robust quality specifications.两种不同外部质量评估方案的结果比较支持稳健质量规范的实用性。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011 Jul;49(7):1143-9. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.196. Epub 2011 May 17.
10
Within- and between-subject biological variation estimates for the enumeration of lymphocyte deep immunophenotyping and monocyte subsets.淋巴细胞深度免疫表型分型和单核细胞亚群计数的受试者内和受试者间生物学变异估计值。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2024 May 31;62(11):2265-2286. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2024-0371. Print 2024 Oct 28.