Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt -
Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Minerva Dent Oral Sci. 2021 Aug;70(4):147-154. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6329.20.04354-X. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
This study evaluated the effect of different polymerization modes and duration on the degree of conversion (DC) of resin cement under different types of ceramics.
Ceramic materials were divided into 3 groups (N.=60): group 1, Cerasmart; group 2, Vita Enamic; and group 3, Vita Mark II. Each group was then divided into three subgroups (N.=20) according to the polymerization mode (A: low-intensity; B: high-intensity; and C: soft-start). Subgroups were then divided into two further groups according to the polymerization time (I: 10 s; and II: 20 s). DC of light-cured resin cement beneath different kinds of ceramics was tested using FTIR spectroscopy. Results were compared to a control group cured without overlying ceramic.
While the type of ceramic and mode of polymerization showed a significant effect on the DC of resin cement, polymerization duration did not. Vita Mark II group showed the highest DC of resin cement followed by Vita Enamic and Cerasmart. High- and low-intensity polymerization modes did not show significant difference, but both showed significantly lower DC when compared to soft start mode.
Type of ceramic and polymerization mode showed a direct effect on the DC of resin cement.
本研究评估了不同聚合模式和持续时间对不同类型陶瓷下树脂水门汀的聚合程度(DC)的影响。
将陶瓷材料分为 3 组(N.=60):组 1,Cerasmart;组 2,Vita Enamic;组 3,Vita Mark II。然后,根据聚合模式(A:低强度;B:高强度;C:软启动)将每组进一步分为 3 个亚组(N.=20)。亚组再根据聚合时间(I:10 s;和 II:20 s)进一步分为两组。使用傅里叶变换红外光谱法测试不同种类陶瓷下光固化树脂水门汀的 DC。结果与未覆盖陶瓷的对照组进行比较。
陶瓷类型和聚合模式对树脂水门汀的 DC 有显著影响,聚合持续时间没有影响。Vita Mark II 组的树脂水门汀 DC 最高,其次是 Vita Enamic 和 Cerasmart。高强度和低强度聚合模式之间没有显著差异,但与软启动模式相比,两者的 DC 明显较低。
陶瓷类型和聚合模式对树脂水门汀的 DC 有直接影响。