Department of Medicine University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora CO.
Department of Medicine Denver Health and Hospital Authority Denver CO.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Aug 4;9(15):e015410. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015410. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
Background Current strategies for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment focus on 10-year or longer timeframes. Shorter-term CVD risk is also clinically relevant, particularly for high-risk occupations, but is under-investigated. Methods and Results We pooled data from participants in the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study), MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis), and DHS (Dallas Heart Study), free from CVD at baseline (N=16 581). Measurements included N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (>100 pg/mL prospectively defined as abnormal); high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (abnormal >5 ng/L); high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (abnormal >3 mg/L); left ventricular hypertrophy by ECG (abnormal if present); carotid intima-media thickness, and plaque (abnormal >75th percentile for age and sex or presence of plaque); and coronary artery calcium (abnormal >10 Agatston U). Each abnormal test result except left ventricular hypertrophy by ECG was independently associated with increased 3-year risk of global CVD (myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, incident heart failure, or atrial fibrillation), even after adjustment for traditional CVD risk factors and the other test results. When a simple integer score counting the number of abnormal tests was used, 3-year multivariable-adjusted global CVD risk was increased among participants with integer scores of 1, 2, 3, and 4, by ≈2-, 3-, 4.5- and 8-fold, respectively, when compared with those with a score of 0. Qualitatively similar results were obtained for atherosclerotic CVD (fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke). Conclusions A strategy incorporating multiple biomarkers and atherosclerosis imaging improved assessment of 3-year global and atherosclerotic CVD risk compared with a standard approach using traditional risk factors.
目前心血管疾病(CVD)风险评估策略侧重于 10 年或更长时间范围。短期 CVD 风险也具有临床相关性,尤其是对于高风险职业,但研究不足。
我们汇总了 ARIC(社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究)、MESA(动脉粥样硬化多民族研究)和 DHS(达拉斯心脏研究)中基线时无 CVD 的参与者的数据(N=16581)。测量包括 N 端脑利钠肽前体(>100pg/ml 前瞻性定义为异常);高敏心肌肌钙蛋白 T(异常>5ng/L);高敏 C 反应蛋白(异常>3mg/L);心电图左心室肥厚(异常存在);颈动脉内膜中层厚度和斑块(异常>年龄和性别第 75 百分位数或存在斑块);以及冠状动脉钙(异常>10 个 Agatston U)。除心电图左心室肥厚外,每个异常检查结果均与全球 CVD(心肌梗死、中风、冠状动脉血运重建、新发心力衰竭或心房颤动)的 3 年风险增加独立相关,即使在调整了传统 CVD 风险因素和其他检查结果后也是如此。当使用简单的整数分数计算异常检查数量时,与分数为 0 的参与者相比,整数分数为 1、2、3 和 4 的参与者的 3 年多变量调整全球 CVD 风险分别增加了≈2 倍、3 倍、4.5 倍和 8 倍。对于动脉粥样硬化性 CVD(致命或非致命性心肌梗死或中风)也得到了类似的定性结果。
与使用传统风险因素的标准方法相比,包含多种生物标志物和动脉粥样硬化成像的策略可改善 3 年全球和动脉粥样硬化性 CVD 风险评估。