Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020 Oct 22;50(11):1274-1281. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa125.
The treatment modality for desmoid-type fibromatosis has shifted from surgery to conservative treatment. The guideline committee for clinical care of extra-abdominal desmoid-type fibromatosis in Japan conducted a systematic review of treatment with doxorubicin-based chemotherapy for desmoid-type fibromatosis.
We searched the pertinent literature. Two reviewers evaluated and screened it independently for eligibility and extracted data. They rated each report according to the grading of recommendations development and evaluation methodology. Based on the 'body of evidence', which the reviewers created, the clinical guideline committee decided a recommendation for the clinical question, 'Is doxorubicin-based chemotherapy effective for patients with extra-abdominal desmoid-type fibromatosis?'
Fifty-three articles were extracted by the literature search, and one from hand search. After the first and second screenings, five articles were subjected to the final evaluation. There were no randomized controlled trials. According to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria, the response rates of doxorubicin-based regimens and liposomal doxorubicin were 44% (28.6-54) and 33.3% (0-75) on average, respectively. In two reports, the response rates of doxorubicin-based regimens were higher than those of non-doxorubicin-based ones; 54% vs 12%, 40% vs 11%, respectively. The rates of G3 or G4 complications according to common terminology criteria for adverse events were 28% and 13% with doxorubicin-based and liposomal doxorubicin chemotherapy, respectively, including neutropenia or cardiac dysfunction. None of the reports addressed the issue of QOL.
Although the evidence level was low in the evaluated studies, doxorubicin-based and liposomal doxorubicin chemotherapy was observed to be effective. However, doxorubicin-based chemotherapy is associated with non-ignorable adverse events, and is not covered by insurance in Japan. We weakly recommend doxorubicin-based chemotherapy for patients with extra-abdominal desmoid-type fibromatosis in cases resistant to other treatments.
对于硬纤维瘤型纤维瘤病的治疗方式已从手术转为保守治疗。日本腹部外硬纤维瘤型纤维瘤病临床护理指南委员会对多柔比星为基础的化疗治疗硬纤维瘤型纤维瘤病进行了系统评价。
我们进行了文献检索。两名审查员独立评估和筛选合格性并提取数据。他们根据推荐分级评估和证据制定方法对每个报告进行了评估。根据审查员创建的“证据体”,临床指南委员会就“多柔比星为基础的化疗对腹部外硬纤维瘤型纤维瘤病患者是否有效?”这一临床问题做出了推荐。
通过文献检索提取了 53 篇文章,通过手工检索提取了 1 篇文章。经过第一次和第二次筛选,有 5 篇文章进行了最终评估。没有随机对照试验。根据实体瘤反应评价标准,多柔比星方案和脂质体多柔比星的缓解率分别为 44%(28.6-54)和 33.3%(0-75)。在两项报告中,多柔比星方案的缓解率高于非多柔比星方案,分别为 54%比 12%,40%比 11%。根据常见不良事件术语标准,多柔比星和脂质体多柔比星化疗的 3 级或 4 级并发症发生率分别为 28%和 13%,包括中性粒细胞减少或心脏功能障碍。没有报告涉及生活质量问题。
尽管评估研究的证据水平较低,但多柔比星方案和脂质体多柔比星化疗被观察到是有效的。然而,多柔比星方案化疗与不可忽视的不良事件相关,在日本未被保险覆盖。我们弱推荐多柔比星方案化疗用于对其他治疗方法耐药的腹部外硬纤维瘤型纤维瘤病患者。