• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

干扰项侵入是注意力延迟参与的结果:动态视觉任务中注意力选择性的一种新的时间变异性解释。

Distractor intrusions are the result of delayed attentional engagement: A new temporal variability account of attentional selectivity in dynamic visual tasks.

作者信息

Zivony Alon, Eimer Martin

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Jan;150(1):23-41. doi: 10.1037/xge0000789. Epub 2020 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1037/xge0000789
PMID:32700923
Abstract

When observers must identify targets among distractors in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) stream, distractor intrusion errors are frequent, demonstrating the difficulty of allocating attention to the right object at the right moment in time. However, the mechanisms responsible for such intrusion errors remain disputed. We propose a new attentional engagement account of selective visual processing in RSVP tasks. Engagement is triggered by the preattentive detection of target-defining features. Critically, the success versus failure of target identification is determined by the speed of such engagement processes on individual trials. To test this account, we measured electrophysiological markers of attentional engagement (N2pc components) in 3 experiments where observers had to report the identity of a target digit in 1 of 2 lateral RSVP streams. On most trials, the target was immediately followed by a digit distractor, resulting in many posttarget distractor intrusions. Critically, N2pcs components measured on distractor intrusion trials were significantly delayed relative to trials with correct target reports. This was the case regardless of whether the target was defined by a shape cue or by its color and even when the location of shape-defined targets was known in advance. These findings show that distractor intrusions are the result of delayed attentional engagement. They demonstrate that temporal variability in attentional selectivity across trials can strongly affect visual awareness and perceptual reports. Our temporal variability account of attentional engagement offers a new framework for assessing the temporal dynamics of attention in visual object recognition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

当观察者必须在快速序列视觉呈现(RSVP)流中的干扰项中识别目标时,干扰项侵入错误很常见,这表明在正确的时间将注意力分配到正确的对象上存在困难。然而,导致这种侵入错误的机制仍存在争议。我们提出了一种关于RSVP任务中选择性视觉处理的新的注意力参与理论。参与是由对目标定义特征的前注意检测触发的。关键的是,目标识别的成功与否取决于个体试验中这种参与过程的速度。为了验证这一理论,我们在3个实验中测量了注意力参与的电生理标记(N2pc成分),在这些实验中,观察者必须报告2个横向RSVP流中1个流中的目标数字的身份。在大多数试验中,目标之后紧接着是一个数字干扰项,导致许多目标后干扰项的侵入。关键的是,在干扰项侵入试验中测量的N2pc成分相对于正确目标报告的试验显著延迟。无论目标是由形状线索还是颜色定义,甚至当形状定义目标的位置提前已知时,都是如此。这些发现表明,干扰项的侵入是注意力参与延迟的结果。它们表明,试验中注意力选择性的时间变异性会强烈影响视觉意识和感知报告。我们关于注意力参与的时间变异性理论为评估视觉对象识别中注意力的时间动态提供了一个新的框架。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2021美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
Distractor intrusions are the result of delayed attentional engagement: A new temporal variability account of attentional selectivity in dynamic visual tasks.干扰项侵入是注意力延迟参与的结果:动态视觉任务中注意力选择性的一种新的时间变异性解释。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Jan;150(1):23-41. doi: 10.1037/xge0000789. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
2
The temporal dynamics of selective attention are reflected by distractor intrusions.注意选择的时间动态反映在分心物的侵入上。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 9;13(1):408. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26902-8.
3
The number of expected targets modulates access to working memory: A new unified account of lag-1 sparing and distractor intrusions.预期目标的数量调节对工作记忆的访问:对滞后1节省和干扰项侵入的一种新的统一解释。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Nov;47(11):1543-1560. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000958.
4
Categorization templates modulate selective attention.分类模板调节选择性注意。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022 Nov;48(11):1294-1312. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001058. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
5
Tracking target and distractor processing in fixed-feature visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology.在固定特征视觉搜索中追踪目标和分心物处理:来自人类电生理学的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Dec;39(6):1713-30. doi: 10.1037/a0032251. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
6
Dynamics of Feature-based Attentional Selection during Color-Shape Conjunction Search.基于特征的注意选择在颜色-形状联合搜索中的动态变化。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Dec;30(12):1773-1787. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01318. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
7
All set, indeed! N2pc components reveal simultaneous attentional control settings for multiple target colors.一切就绪,确实如此!N2pc 成分揭示了对多种目标颜色的同时注意力控制设置。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Aug;42(8):1215-30. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000221. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
8
Perceptual competition between targets and distractors determines working memory access and produces intrusion errors in rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) tasks.目标与干扰项之间的知觉竞争决定了工作记忆的提取,并在快速序列视觉呈现(RSVP)任务中产生侵入性错误。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Dec;46(12):1490-1510. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000871. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
9
The roles of relevance and expectation for the control of attention in visual search.关联和期望在视觉搜索中对注意力控制的作用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Sep;45(9):1191-1205. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000666. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
10
The Speed of Serial Attention Shifts in Visual Search: Evidence from the N2pc Component.视觉搜索中序列注意转移的速度:来自N2pc成分的证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Feb;28(2):319-32. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00898. Epub 2015 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Conflicting Sensory Information Sharpens the Neural Representations of Early Selective Visuospatial Attention.冲突的感觉信息能使早期选择性视空间注意力的神经表征更加清晰。
J Neurosci. 2024 Aug 14;44(33):e2012232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2012-23.2024.
2
Transient Attention Gates Access Consciousness: Coupling N2pc and P3 Latencies Using Dynamic Time Warping.瞬态注意门控意识:使用动态时间规整耦合 N2pc 和 P3 潜伏期。
J Neurosci. 2024 Jun 26;44(26):e1798232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1798-23.2024.
3
Attention and feature binding in the temporal domain.
时间域中的注意力与特征绑定
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Dec;31(6):2599-2610. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02493-5. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
4
Using synchronized eye movements to assess attentional engagement.使用同步眼球运动评估注意力投入。
Psychol Res. 2023 Oct;87(7):2039-2047. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01791-2. Epub 2023 Jan 17.