Suppr超能文献

放射性碘、抗甲状腺药物和手术治疗与甲状腺功能亢进症患者实体癌死亡率的关系。

Association of Radioactive Iodine, Antithyroid Drug, and Surgical Treatments With Solid Cancer Mortality in Patients With Hyperthyroidism.

机构信息

Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

Hirosoft International, Eureka, California.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e209660. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9660.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The long-term health effects of radioactive iodine (RAI) and antithyroid drug (ATD) treatments compared with surgery for hyperthyroidism remain uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To compare solid cancer mortality rates associated with RAI and ATD treatments vs surgical management for hyperthyroidism.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter cohort study assessed patients treated for hyperthyroidism from January 1, 1946, to December 31, 1964, with follow-up through December 31, 2014. Data analysis was performed from August 1, 2019, to April 23, 2020.

EXPOSURES

Management with RAI, ATDs, surgical intervention, or combinations of these treatments.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Comparisons of solid cancer mortality rates in each treatment group with expected rates from the general population were assessed using standardized mortality ratios (SMRs), and internal comparisons were assessed using hazard ratios (HRs) adjusted for age, sex, and underlying diagnosis (Graves disease or toxic nodular goiter).

RESULTS

Of 31 363 patients (24 894 [79.4%] female; mean [SD] age, 46.9 [14.8] years) included in the study, 28 523 (90.9%) had Graves disease. The median follow-up time was 26.0 years (interquartile range, 12.3-41.9 years). Important differences in patient characteristics existed across treatment groups at study entry. Notably, the drug-only group (3.6% of the cohort) included a higher proportion of patients with prior cancers (7.3% vs 1.9%-4.0%), contributing to an elevated SMR for solid cancer mortality. After excluding prior cancers, solid cancer SMRs were not elevated in any of the treatment groups (SMR for surgery only, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.66-1.00]; SMR for drugs only, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.74-1.09]; SMR for drugs and surgery, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.84-0.94]; SMR for RAI only, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.84-0.96]; SMR for surgery and RAI, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.52-0.85]; SMR for drugs and RAI, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.89-1.00]; and SMR for drugs, surgery, and RAI, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.75-0.96]), and no significant HRs for solid cancer death were observed across treatment groups. Among RAI-treated patients, HRs for solid cancer mortality increased significantly across levels of total administered activity (1.08 per 370 MBq; 95% CI, 1.03-1.13 per 370 MBq); this association was stronger among patients treated with only RAI (HR, 1.19 per 370 MBq; 95% CI, 1.09-1.30 per 370 MBq).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

After controlling for known sources of confounding, the study found no significant differences in the risk of solid cancer mortality by treatment group. However, among RAI-treated patients, a modest positive association was observed between total administered activity and solid cancer mortality, providing further evidence in support of a dose-dependent association between RAI and solid cancer mortality.

摘要

重要性

放射性碘(RAI)和抗甲状腺药物(ATD)治疗与手术治疗甲状腺功能亢进症相比,其长期健康影响仍不确定。

目的

比较 RAI 和 ATD 治疗与手术治疗甲状腺功能亢进症的患者的实体癌死亡率。

设计、设置和参与者:这项多中心队列研究评估了 1946 年 1 月 1 日至 1964 年 12 月 31 日接受治疗的甲状腺功能亢进症患者,随访至 2014 年 12 月 31 日。数据分析于 2019 年 8 月 1 日至 2020 年 4 月 23 日进行。

暴露

接受 RAI、ATD、手术干预或这些治疗方法的组合治疗。

主要结果和测量

使用标准化死亡率比(SMR)比较每个治疗组的实体癌死亡率与普通人群的预期死亡率,并使用年龄、性别和潜在诊断(格雷夫斯病或毒性结节性甲状腺肿)调整的风险比(HR)进行内部比较。

结果

在 31363 名患者(24894 名[79.4%]为女性;平均[SD]年龄为 46.9[14.8]岁)中,28523 名(90.9%)患有格雷夫斯病。中位随访时间为 26.0 年(四分位距,12.3-41.9 年)。在研究开始时,治疗组之间存在重要的患者特征差异。值得注意的是,仅用药物治疗的组(队列的 3.6%)包括更高比例的既往癌症患者(7.3%比 1.9%-4.0%),导致实体癌死亡率的 SMR 升高。在排除既往癌症后,任何治疗组的实体癌 SMR 均未升高(仅手术治疗的 SMR 为 0.82[95%CI,0.66-1.00];仅药物治疗的 SMR 为 0.90[95%CI,0.74-1.09];药物和手术治疗的 SMR 为 0.88[95%CI,0.84-0.94];仅 RAI 治疗的 SMR 为 0.90[95%CI,0.84-0.96];手术和 RAI 治疗的 SMR 为 0.66[95%CI,0.52-0.85];药物和 RAI 治疗的 SMR 为 0.94[95%CI,0.89-1.00];药物、手术和 RAI 治疗的 SMR 为 0.85[95%CI,0.75-0.96]),并且在治疗组之间未观察到实体癌死亡的显著 HR。在接受 RAI 治疗的患者中,总给予活性的水平与实体癌死亡率呈显著正相关(每 370MBq 增加 1.08;95%CI,每 370MBq 增加 1.03-1.13);这种关联在仅接受 RAI 治疗的患者中更强(HR,每 370MBq 增加 1.19;95%CI,每 370MBq 增加 1.09-1.30)。

结论和相关性

在控制已知混杂源后,研究未发现治疗组实体癌死亡风险存在显著差异。然而,在接受 RAI 治疗的患者中,总给予活性与实体癌死亡率之间观察到适度的正相关,进一步证明了 RAI 与实体癌死亡率之间存在剂量依赖性关联。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33a2/7378755/ef256b135da2/jamanetwopen-3-e209660-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验