Davies Andrew, Leach Charlotte, Butler Claire, Gregory Amanda, Henshaw Sarah, Minton Ollie, Shorthose Kate, Batsari Kabir M
Palliative Care Department, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Wisdom Hospice, Rochester, United Kingdom.
Pain. 2021 Jan;162(1):309-318. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002024.
The aim of this study was to investigate opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in a large cohort of "real-world" patients with cancer; the objectives were to determine the prevalence of OIC, the utility of a simple screening question, the accuracy of the Rome IV diagnostic criteria, the clinical features of OIC (physical and psychological), and the impact of OIC (quality of life). One thousand patients with cancer were enrolled in the study, which involved completion of the Rome IV diagnostic criteria for OIC, the Bowel Function Index, the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life questionnaire, and the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-Short Form. Participants also underwent a thorough clinical assessment by an experienced clinician (ie, "gold-standard" assessment of OIC). Fifty-nine percent of patients were clinically assessed as having OIC, 2.5% as having another cause of constipation, and 19% as not having constipation but were taking regular laxatives. The simple screening question produced a number of false-negative results (19% of patients), whereas the Rome IV diagnostic criteria had an accuracy of 81.9%. Patients with OIC had more symptoms overall, higher Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-Short Form subscale scores (and total score), and higher Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life questionnaire subscale scores (and the overall score). Opioid-induced constipation was not associated with demographic factors, cancer diagnosis, performance status, or opioid equivalent dosage: OIC was associated with opioid analgesic, with patients receiving tramadol and transdermal buprenorphine having less constipation. The study confirms that OIC is common among patients with cancer pain and is associated with a spectrum of physical symptoms, a range of psychological symptoms, and an overall deterioration in the quality of life.
本研究旨在调查一大群“真实世界”癌症患者中的阿片类药物引起的便秘(OIC);目标是确定OIC的患病率、一个简单筛查问题的效用、罗马IV诊断标准的准确性、OIC的临床特征(身体和心理方面)以及OIC的影响(生活质量)。1000名癌症患者参与了该研究,研究内容包括完成OIC的罗马IV诊断标准、肠道功能指数、便秘生活质量患者评估问卷以及简明症状评估量表。参与者还接受了一位经验丰富的临床医生的全面临床评估(即OIC的“金标准”评估)。59%的患者经临床评估患有OIC,2.5%患有其他便秘原因,19%没有便秘但正在服用常规泻药。简单的筛查问题产生了一些假阴性结果(19%的患者),而罗马IV诊断标准的准确率为81.9%。患有OIC的患者总体症状更多,简明症状评估量表子量表得分(及总分)更高,便秘生活质量患者评估问卷子量表得分(及总分)也更高。阿片类药物引起的便秘与人口统计学因素、癌症诊断、体能状态或阿片类药物等效剂量无关:OIC与阿片类镇痛药有关,接受曲马多和透皮丁丙诺啡的患者便秘较少。该研究证实,OIC在癌症疼痛患者中很常见,并且与一系列身体症状、多种心理症状以及生活质量的整体下降有关。