From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (A.M.S., W.D., D.W., D.A.E.), Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (R.A.P.), University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Simul Healthc. 2021 Oct 1;16(5):311-317. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000494.
In a prior study, we validated the FAST workstation as an objective evaluator of hand-tied surgical knots. The goal of this study was to determine whether guided practice with the FAST workstation could lead to objective improvement in hand-tied surgical knot performance.
Sixty participants were randomized into 1 of 2 groups: a control group, with access to only the knot-tying station, and a test group, with access to the knot-tying station plus the knot testing station. The study was divided into 3 phases: prepractice, practice, and postpractice. Using the FAST workstation, participants hand-tied 5 knots, 15 knots, and 5 knots using 0 Vicryl suture in the prepractice, practice, and postpractice phases, respectively. Knots for each participant from the prepractice and postpractice phases were collected, tested, and compared.
Within the control group, the average number of prepractice knot successes was 2.63, and the average number of postpractice knot successes was 3.40, which resulted in an improvement of average knot successes of 0.77 (P < 0.01). Within the test group, the average number of prepractice knot successes was 2.40, and the average number of postpractice knot successes was 4.10, which resulted in an improvement of average knot successes of 1.70 (P < 0.01). The difference in average improvement of knot-tying successes (0.93 knots) between the 2 groups was statistically significant (P < 0.01).
A knot-tying trainer that provides objective feedback on knot performance may better improve hand-tied surgical knot proficiency compared with one without objective feedback.
在之前的一项研究中,我们验证了 FAST 工作站作为手动打结手术的客观评估器的有效性。本研究的目的是确定使用 FAST 工作站进行指导练习是否可以客观地提高手动打结手术的水平。
将 60 名参与者随机分为 2 组中的 1 组:对照组,仅可以使用打结站;测试组,除了打结站外还可以使用打结测试站。该研究分为 3 个阶段:练习前、练习中和练习后。使用 FAST 工作站,参与者分别在练习前、练习中和练习后使用 0 号 Vicryl 缝线手动打结 5 个结、15 个结和 5 个结。收集每个参与者在练习前和练习后的结,并进行测试和比较。
在对照组中,平均练习前结成功数为 2.63,平均练习后结成功数为 3.40,平均结成功数提高了 0.77(P<0.01)。在测试组中,平均练习前结成功数为 2.40,平均练习后结成功数为 4.10,平均结成功数提高了 1.70(P<0.01)。2 组间结成功率平均提高(0.93 个结)的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。
与没有客观反馈的打结训练器相比,提供结性能客观反馈的打结训练器可能会更好地提高手动打结手术的熟练程度。