From the Department of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi.
Department of Psychiatry, Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato, Tokyo.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 Sep/Oct;40(5):468-474. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001264.
The exact recurrence rate of bipolar disorder in patients receiving lithium maintenance phase treatment and the modifiers associated with recurrence are still unknown.
We searched Embase, PubMed, and CENTRAL from inception until April 28, 2020. Outcomes included recurrence rate of any mood episode, depressive episodes, and manic/hypomanic/mixed episodes; all-cause discontinuation rate; and discontinuation rate due to adverse events. A random-effects model, single-group summary meta-analysis was conducted. A meta-regression analysis to examine whether the modifiers (total number of patients, %female, mean age, duration of study, duration of preliminary phase, publication year, bipolar disorder type, mood status at recruitment, presence of a placebo arm, sponsorship, enrichment design, number of treatment arms, and risk of bias for blinding or randomization) were associated with the event rate of the outcomes was also performed.
We identified 21 randomized trials (n = 1,415; mean study duration, 78.40 ± 32.10 weeks; %female, 54.85%; mean age, 43.47 ± 4.88 years). The event rates (95% confidence interval [CI]) were as follows: recurrence of any mood episode, 39.8% (32.8%, 47.1%); depressive episodes, 25.6% (18.8%, 34.0%); manic/hypomanic/mixed episodes, 18.5% (13.7%, 24.7%); all-cause discontinuation rate, 67.0% (57.2%, 75.5%); and discontinuation rate due to adverse events, 8.7% (5.1%, 14.7%). After adjusting for multiple testing, our meta-regression analysis showed association only between the all-cause discontinuation rate and presence of a placebo arm.
The recurrence rate of depressive episodes seemed to be higher than the recurrence rate of manic/hypomanic/mixed episodes. The all-cause discontinuation rate was high. However, the studies included in our meta-analysis were of short duration.
接受锂维持治疗的双相障碍患者的确切复发率以及与复发相关的修饰因子仍不清楚。
我们检索了 Embase、PubMed 和 CENTRAL,检索时间从建库至 2020 年 4 月 28 日。结局包括任何心境发作、抑郁发作和躁狂/轻躁狂/混合发作的复发率;全因停药率;以及因不良事件导致的停药率。采用随机效应模型、单组汇总荟萃分析。进行荟萃回归分析,以检验修饰因子(总患者人数、女性百分比、平均年龄、研究持续时间、预试验持续时间、出版年份、双相障碍类型、招募时的心境状态、安慰剂组的存在、赞助、富集设计、治疗臂数和盲法或随机化的偏倚风险)是否与结局的事件率相关。
我们确定了 21 项随机试验(n=1415;平均研究持续时间为 78.40±32.10 周;女性百分比为 54.85%;平均年龄为 43.47±4.88 岁)。事件率(95%置信区间[CI])如下:任何心境发作的复发率为 39.8%(32.8%,47.1%);抑郁发作的复发率为 25.6%(18.8%,34.0%);躁狂/轻躁狂/混合发作的复发率为 18.5%(13.7%,24.7%);全因停药率为 67.0%(57.2%,75.5%);以及因不良事件导致的停药率为 8.7%(5.1%,14.7%)。经过多次检验校正后,我们的荟萃回归分析显示,仅全因停药率与安慰剂组的存在有关。
抑郁发作的复发率似乎高于躁狂/轻躁狂/混合发作的复发率。全因停药率较高。然而,我们荟萃分析中纳入的研究持续时间较短。