Suppr超能文献

SPOT GRADE II:一种新的可重复量化手术伤口出血方法的临床验证:前瞻性、多中心、多学科、单臂研究。

SPOT GRADE II: Clinical Validation of a New Method for Reproducibly Quantifying Surgical Wound Bleeding: Prospective, Multicenter, Multispecialty, Single-Arm Study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

出版信息

Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2020 Jan-Dec;26:1076029620936340. doi: 10.1177/1076029620936340.

Abstract

The SPOT GRADE (SG), a Surface Bleeding Severity Scale, is a unique visual method for assessing bleeding severity based on quantitative determinations of blood flow. This study assessed the reliability of the SG scale in a clinical setting and collected initial data on the safety and efficacy of HEMOBLAST Bellows (HB), a hemostatic agent, in abdominal and orthopedic operations. Twenty-seven patients were enrolled across 3 centers and received the investigational device. Bleeding severity and hemostasis were independently assessed by 2 surgical investigators at baseline and at 3, 6, and 10 minutes after application of HB and compared for agreement. The mean paired κ statistic for assignment of SG scores was .7754. The mean paired κ statistics for determining eligibility for participation in the trial based on bleeding severity and the mean paired κ statistics determining the presence of hemostasis were .9301 and .9301, respectively. The proportion of patients achieving hemostasis within 3, 6, and 10 minutes of HB application were 50.0%, 79.2%, and 91.7%, respectively. There were no unanticipated adverse device effects and one possible serious adverse device effect, as determined by the Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC). The reliability of the SG scale was validated in a clinical setting. Initial data on the safety and efficacy of HB in abdominal and orthopedic operations were collected, and there were no concerns raised by the investigators or the IDMC.

摘要

SPOT 分级(SG)是一种独特的基于血流定量测定的表面出血严重程度评估方法。本研究评估了 SG 量表在临床环境中的可靠性,并收集了止血剂 HEMOBLAST 风箱(HB)在腹部和骨科手术中的安全性和有效性的初步数据。3 个中心共纳入 27 例患者,并接受了研究器械。在基线和 HB 应用后 3、6 和 10 分钟时,由 2 名外科调查员独立评估出血严重程度和止血情况,并进行一致性比较。SG 评分赋值的平均配对 κ 统计量为.7754。基于出血严重程度确定参与试验的资格和确定止血的平均配对 κ 统计量分别为.9301 和.9301。HB 应用后 3、6 和 10 分钟内达到止血的患者比例分别为 50.0%、79.2%和 91.7%。没有意外的不良设备影响,只有一个可能的严重不良设备影响,由独立数据监测委员会(IDMC)确定。SG 量表的可靠性已在临床环境中得到验证。收集了 HB 在腹部和骨科手术中的安全性和有效性的初步数据,调查员和 IDMC 均未提出任何担忧。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验