Suppr超能文献

地西他滨治疗骨髓增生异常综合征的临床疗效及影响因素

Clinical effect of decitabine in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome and influencing factors.

作者信息

Liu Tangxia, Wang Jing, Li Chunmei, Jia Lingzhi

机构信息

Tangxia Liu, Hematology Department, Binzhou People's Hospital, Shandong, 256610, China.

Jing Wang, Mental Health Center, Binzhou People's Hospital, Shandong, 256610, China.

出版信息

Pak J Med Sci. 2020 Jul-Aug;36(5):1084-1088. doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.5.2289.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effect of decitabine combined with conventional chemotherapy on myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and its influencing factors.

METHODS

Eighty patients with MDS who were admitted to our hospital were selected by this study between February 2017 and February 2018. The selected patients were divided into a traditional group (CAG/DA scheme) and the combined group (DAC combined with CAG/DA scheme) according to the random number table method, 40 each. The clinical treatment effects of the two groups were compared, and the influencing factors of the effect were analyzed.

RESULTS

After four courses of treatment, the difference in the total effective rate between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05); the difference in the incidence of adverse reactions and in the overall survival (OS) rate between the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). However, the progression free survival (PFS) rate of the combined group was significantly higher compared with the traditional group (P<0.05); the Hb level, WHO stage and and karyotype of the patients before treatment had significant influence on the treatment effect (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

DAC in combination with conventional chemotherapy has good effect in the treatment of MDS, and it will not increase adverse reactions. In addition to treatment scheme, the influencing factors of the effect of treatment for MDS also include Hb, WHO stage and karyotype.

摘要

目的

分析地西他滨联合传统化疗对骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)的疗效及其影响因素。

方法

选取2017年2月至2018年2月我院收治的80例MDS患者,采用随机数字表法将入选患者分为传统组(CAG/DA方案)和联合组(DAC联合CAG/DA方案),每组40例。比较两组的临床治疗效果,并分析疗效的影响因素。

结果

经过4个疗程的治疗,两组总有效率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组不良反应发生率和总生存(OS)率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。然而,联合组的无进展生存(PFS)率明显高于传统组(P<0.05);患者治疗前的血红蛋白(Hb)水平、世界卫生组织(WHO)分期及核型对治疗效果有显著影响(P<0.05)。

结论

DAC联合传统化疗治疗MDS疗效良好,且不会增加不良反应。除治疗方案外,MDS治疗效果的影响因素还包括Hb、WHO分期及核型。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Uncoding the genetic heterogeneity of myelodysplastic syndrome.解析骨髓增生异常综合征的遗传异质性。
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2017 Dec 8;2017(1):447-452. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2017.1.447.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验