Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL; DeRosa Physical Therapy, Flagstaff, AZ.
School of Allied Health Sciences Department, University of Las Vegas Nevada, Las Vegas, NV.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2020 May;43(4):339-355. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.04.006. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
To investigate the immediate changes in resting and contracted thickness of the transversus abdominis (TrA) muscle after application of thrust joint manipulation (TJM) vs sham manipulation in participants with low back pain.
A pretest-posttest randomized controlled trial design was performed. Consecutive subjects satisfying eligibility criteria completed patient-report outcome baseline measures, pretreatment rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) measurements, followed by the randomly assigned intervention then, post-treatment RUSI measurements, and post-treatment & final patient-reported outcome measures. To compare the outcomes of TJM and sham manipulation on the TrA muscle thickness, a 2-by-2 analysis of variance (treatment [TJM and sham manipulation]) by time (pretreatment and post-treatment) was completed for both the TrA muscle thickness at rest and muscle thickness during contraction. Descriptive statistics including independent-sample t tests for continuous variables and χ tests for categorical variables were used to analyze differences in patient-reported outcome measures between groups.
Sixty-seven eligible participants agreed to participate. No significant interactions were identified for either muscle thickness at rest or contraction.
This study did not support the hypothesis that manipulation would result in greater changes in TrA thickness at rest or during contraction in participants with low back pain. Based on prior research that identified subgroups of participants likely to respond to manipulation, future research should include participants more likely to respond favorably to TJM. This study was a priori registered with clinicaltrails.gov (NCT02558855).
探讨在腰痛患者中,经皮关节突推扳手法(TJM)与假手法治疗后,腹横肌(TrA)在静息和收缩状态下厚度的即刻变化。
采用前后测随机对照试验设计。连续符合纳入标准的受试者完成患者报告结局的基线测量、治疗前康复超声成像(RUSI)测量,然后接受随机分配的干预措施,接着进行治疗后 RUSI 测量和治疗后及最终患者报告结局测量。为了比较 TJM 和假手法对 TrA 肌肉厚度的影响,对静息和收缩状态下的 TrA 肌肉厚度进行了 2-by-2 分析的方差分析(处理[TJM 和假手法]),同时还进行了时间(治疗前和治疗后)的分析。对于患者报告结局测量指标,采用独立样本 t 检验进行连续变量分析,采用卡方检验进行分类变量分析,以比较组间差异。
67 名符合条件的参与者同意参与研究。无论是在静息状态还是收缩状态下,肌肉厚度均未发现显著的处理间交互作用。
本研究不支持这样一种假设,即手法治疗会导致腰痛患者 TrA 厚度在静息或收缩时发生更大的变化。基于先前研究确定了可能对手法治疗有反应的亚组参与者,未来的研究应包括更有可能对 TJM 治疗产生积极反应的参与者。本研究在临床实验注册网站(NCT02558855)进行了预先注册。