Suppr超能文献

飞机除虫:作为一项公共卫生措施有何用处?

Aircraft disinsection: what is the usefulness as a public health measure?

作者信息

Grout Andrea, Russell Richard C

机构信息

College of Business, Law and Governance, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.

School of Public Health and Western Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

J Travel Med. 2021 Feb 23;28(2). doi: 10.1093/jtm/taaa124.

Abstract

RATIONALE FOR REVIEW

Insecticide treatments in aircraft (termed 'aircraft disinsection') aim to support the containment of potentially disease-carrying vector insects. The introduction of non-endemic mosquito species is of concern as some mosquitoes can act as vectors of many serious human diseases. Expansion of vectors to previously non-endemic regions, extended flight networks and mosquito resistance to insecticides pose challenges to contemporary vector-control approaches. Despite established efficacy of aircraft disinsection in trials, there is increasing concern over its effectiveness and feasibility in flight operations, and its usefulness as a public health measure.

KEY FINDINGS

We explored the literature on disinsection through a narrative approach to obtain a pragmatic assessment of existing and future implementation challenges. We describe the shortcomings that hinder evaluation of the success of aircraft disinsection. These shortcomings include operational constraints that may impact effective treatment outcomes, lack of longitudinal data on pesticide exposure scenarios, lack of compliance mechanisms, pesticide resistance in mosquitoes, and limited evidence of the extent and type of mosquito species potentially transported via aircraft.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Concerns about the introduction of non-endemic mosquito vectors reinforce the need for effective preventive measures. Import of disease vectors is likely to occur in the future under changing environmental and operational conditions. Optimal impact from disinsection requires appropriate deployment, commitment and use. The current system of evaluation is inadequate for producing the evidence needed for informed policy decisions. While utilizing the results of research into environmentally sustainable vector-control methods for use in aircraft, future approaches to aircraft disinsection require improved evidence of anticipated benefits and harms, reliable monitoring data on insecticide resistance, and must be supported by strong vector control at airports.

摘要

审查理由

飞机上的杀虫剂处理(称为“飞机除虫”)旨在协助控制可能携带疾病的病媒昆虫。引入非本地蚊子物种令人担忧,因为一些蚊子可作为多种严重人类疾病的病媒。病媒向以前的非流行地区扩展、飞行网络的扩大以及蚊子对杀虫剂产生抗药性,给当代病媒控制方法带来了挑战。尽管飞机除虫在试验中已证实有效,但人们越来越担心其在飞行操作中的有效性和可行性,以及作为一项公共卫生措施的实用性。

主要发现

我们通过叙述性方法探讨了有关除虫的文献,以对现有和未来实施挑战进行务实评估。我们描述了阻碍评估飞机除虫成功与否的缺点。这些缺点包括可能影响有效处理结果的操作限制、缺乏关于农药暴露情况的纵向数据、缺乏合规机制、蚊子对杀虫剂的抗药性,以及关于可能通过飞机运输的蚊子种类的范围和类型的证据有限。

结论与建议

对引入非本地蚊子病媒的担忧强化了采取有效预防措施的必要性。在不断变化的环境和操作条件下,未来可能会出现病媒的输入。除虫要达到最佳效果需要适当的部署、投入和使用。目前的评估系统不足以提供做出明智政策决策所需的证据。在利用对环境可持续的飞机病媒控制方法的研究结果时,未来的飞机除虫方法需要有关于预期利弊的更好证据、关于杀虫剂抗药性的可靠监测数据,并且必须得到机场强有力的病媒控制的支持。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验