• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

近期心肌梗死与急性心肌梗死的临床差异——来自东京 CCU 网络多中心注册研究的见解。

Clinical Differences of Recent Myocardial Infarction Compared With Acute Myocardial Infarction - Insights From the Tokyo CCU Network Multicenter Registry.

机构信息

Tokyo CCU Network Scientific Committee.

Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Medical University Hospital.

出版信息

Circ J. 2020 Aug 25;84(9):1511-1518. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0333. Epub 2020 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0333
PMID:32713883
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Characteristics and treatment outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients have been studied; however, those of recent myocardial infarction (RMI) patients remain unclear. This study aimed to clarify characteristics, treatment strategy, and in-hospital outcomes of RMI patients in the Tokyo CCU network database.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In total, 1,853 RMI and 12,494 AMI patients from the Tokyo CCU network database during 2013-2016 were compared. Both RMI and AMI were redefined by onset times of 2-28 days and ≤24 h, respectively. The RMI group had a higher average age (70.4±12.9 vs. 68.0±13.4 years, P<0.001), more women (27.6% vs. 23.6%, P<0.001), lower proportion of patients with chest pain as the chief complaint (75.2% vs. 83.6%, P<0.001), higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (35.9% vs. 31.0%, P<0.001), and higher mechanical complication incidence (3.0% vs. 1.5%, P<0.001) than did the AMI group. Thirty-day mortality was comparable (5.3% vs. 5.8%, P=0.360); major causes of death were cardiogenic shock and mechanical complications in the AMI and RMI groups, respectively. Death from mechanical complications (not onset time) in the AMI group plateaued almost 1 week after hospitalization, whereas it continued to increase in the RMI group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both RMI and AMI patients have distinctive clinical features, sequelae, and causes of death. Although treatment of RMI patients adhered to guidelines, it was insufficient, and death from mechanical complications continues to increase.

摘要

背景

急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者的特征和治疗结果已得到研究;然而,最近心肌梗死(RMI)患者的特征仍不清楚。本研究旨在阐明东京 CCU 网络数据库中 RMI 患者的特征、治疗策略和住院结局。

方法和结果

共比较了 2013-2016 年东京 CCU 网络数据库中的 1853 例 RMI 和 12494 例 AMI 患者。RMI 和 AMI 分别通过发病时间 2-28 天和≤24 小时重新定义。RMI 组平均年龄较高(70.4±12.9 岁 vs. 68.0±13.4 岁,P<0.001),女性比例较高(27.6% vs. 23.6%,P<0.001),胸痛为主诉的患者比例较低(75.2% vs. 83.6%,P<0.001),糖尿病患病率较高(35.9% vs. 31.0%,P<0.001),机械并发症发生率较高(3.0% vs. 1.5%,P<0.001)。30 天死亡率相当(5.3% vs. 5.8%,P=0.360);AMI 和 RMI 组的主要死亡原因为心源性休克和机械并发症。AMI 组机械并发症(非发病时间)所致死亡在住院后近 1 周内趋于平稳,而 RMI 组则持续增加。

结论

AMI 和 RMI 患者均具有独特的临床特征、后遗症和死亡原因。尽管 RMI 患者的治疗符合指南,但仍不充分,机械并发症所致死亡仍在继续增加。

相似文献

1
Clinical Differences of Recent Myocardial Infarction Compared With Acute Myocardial Infarction - Insights From the Tokyo CCU Network Multicenter Registry.近期心肌梗死与急性心肌梗死的临床差异——来自东京 CCU 网络多中心注册研究的见解。
Circ J. 2020 Aug 25;84(9):1511-1518. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0333. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
2
Higher non-cardiac mortality and lesser impact of early revascularization in patients with type 2 compared to type 1 acute myocardial infarction: results from the Tokyo CCU Network registry.与1型急性心肌梗死患者相比,2型急性心肌梗死患者的非心脏死亡率更高,早期血运重建的影响更小:来自东京冠心病监护病房网络登记处的结果。
Heart Vessels. 2019 Jul;34(7):1140-1147. doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01350-z. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
3
Current characteristics and management of ST elevation and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in the Tokyo metropolitan area: from the Tokyo CCU network registered cohort.东京都地区ST段抬高型和非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的当前特征与管理:来自东京CCU网络注册队列研究
Heart Vessels. 2016 Nov;31(11):1740-1751. doi: 10.1007/s00380-015-0791-9. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
4
Absence of gender differences in clinical outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. A report from the SHOCK Trial Registry.急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克患者临床结局无性别差异。SHOCK试验注册研究报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Nov 1;38(5):1395-401. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01581-9.
5
Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.血管内微型轴流左心室辅助装置与主动脉内球囊泵在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者中的应用与院内死亡率和大出血的关系。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 25;323(8):734-745. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0254.
6
The prognostic impact of revascularization strategy in acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: Insights from the British Columbia Cardiac Registry.急性心肌梗死和心原性休克血运重建策略的预后影响:来自不列颠哥伦比亚心脏登记的见解。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov 1;92(5):E356-E367. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27648. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
7
Trends in first-time hospitalization, management, and short-term mortality in acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock from 2005 to 2017: A nationwide cohort study.2005 年至 2017 年急性心肌梗死后心源性休克患者首次住院、治疗和短期死亡率的趋势:一项全国性队列研究。
Am Heart J. 2020 Nov;229:127-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.08.012. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
8
Clinical features and predictors of non-cardiac death in patients hospitalised for acute myocardial infarction: Insights from the Tokyo CCU network multicentre registry.急性心肌梗死住院患者非心源性死亡的临床特征及预测因素:来自东京重症监护病房网络多中心注册研究的见解
Int J Cardiol. 2023 May 1;378:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.02.022. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
9
Surgical revascularization after acute myocardial infarction in patients with end-stage renal disease.终末期肾病患者急性心肌梗死后的外科血管重建术。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Oct;26(4):671-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.07.002.
10
Examination of the appropriate timing of reperfusion therapy for recent myocardial infarction: a Japanese single-center retrospective study.近期心肌梗死再灌注治疗适宜时机的研究:一项日本单中心回顾性研究
Indian Heart J. 2018 Jan-Feb;70(1):4-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2017.06.015. Epub 2017 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between the Angle of the Left Subclavian Artery and Procedural Time for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.左锁骨下动脉角度与急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时间的关系。
J Interv Cardiol. 2022 Nov 17;2022:3249745. doi: 10.1155/2022/3249745. eCollection 2022.
2
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the hospitalizations, time course, presenting symptoms, and mid-term outcomes in patients with myocardial infarctions in a Japanese multi-center registry.COVID-19 大流行对日本多中心注册研究中心心肌梗死患者住院情况、时间进程、临床表现和中期结局的影响。
Heart Vessels. 2023 Apr;38(4):459-469. doi: 10.1007/s00380-022-02183-z. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
3
Prediction of Myocardial Infarction From Patient Features With Machine Learning.
利用机器学习从患者特征预测心肌梗死
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 14;9:754609. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.754609. eCollection 2022.