Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Medical Direction, Korian Italy, Milan, Italy.
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2020 Sep;20(9):828-832. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13984. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
The benefits of antiplatelets to prevent cardio- and cerebrovascular disease are recognized and appropriate only for "secondary prevention." This multicenter retrospective study was designed to (i) examine the prevalence of residents receiving antiplatelets for primary and secondary cardio- and cerebrovascular prevention, and (ii) evaluate the predictors of inappropriate antiplatelet prescription.
This study was conducted in a sample of Italian long-term care nursing homes (NHs). Appropriate use of antiplatelets was defined in accordance with the strongest evidence-based indications.
Among the 2579 patients recruited from 27 long-term care NHs (age mean ± SD: 86.8 ± 7.3; women: 1995; 77.4%), 1092 were treated with antiplatelets (42.3%) and 619 (56.7%) were receiving antiplatelet agents for inappropriate primary prevention of cardio- or cerebrovascular atherothrombotic events. Age, dementia or cerebral atherosclerosis, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes without chronic complication and hypertension were predictors of inappropriate prescription of antiplatelets. Patients inappropriately treated with antiplatelets also had a higher risk of receiving proton pump inhibitors than those appropriately not treated in univariate (OR 95% CI = 2.79 (2.25-3.46, p < 0.0001) and multivariate models (OR 95% CI 2.71 (2.16-3.40, p < 0.0001).
Most patients receiving antiplatelet agents in NHs are being inappropriately treated for primary prevention of cardio- or cerebrovascular disease. NH residents with diagnosis of dementia or cerebral atherosclerosis, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes without chronic complication and hypertension seemed more likely to receive antiplatelets inappropriately. Patients without an evidence-based indication for antiplatelets also received proton-pump inhibitors in an unnecessary "prescribing cascade," which should be assessed for de-prescribing. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2020; 20: 828-832.
抗血小板药物预防心脑血管疾病的益处已得到认可,且仅适用于“二级预防”。本多中心回顾性研究旨在:(i) 调查居民接受抗血小板药物进行心脑血管疾病一级和二级预防的情况;(ii) 评估抗血小板药物处方不当的预测因素。
本研究在意大利长期护理养老院(NH)的样本中进行。抗血小板药物的合理使用根据最强的循证指征定义。
从 27 家长期护理 NH 中招募了 2579 名患者(年龄均值±标准差:86.8±7.3;女性:1995;77.4%),其中 1092 名接受了抗血小板药物治疗(42.3%),619 名(56.7%)接受了抗血小板药物治疗,用于预防心脑血管动脉粥样硬化血栓形成事件的不适当一级预防。年龄、痴呆或脑动脉粥样硬化、充血性心力衰竭、外周血管疾病、无慢性并发症的糖尿病和高血压是抗血小板药物处方不当的预测因素。在单变量(比值比[OR]95%置信区间[CI]为 2.79(2.25-3.46,p < 0.0001)和多变量模型(OR 95% CI 2.71(2.16-3.40,p < 0.0001)中,与合理未接受抗血小板药物治疗的患者相比,接受抗血小板药物治疗不当的患者使用质子泵抑制剂的风险更高。
NH 中接受抗血小板药物治疗的患者大多因心脑血管疾病的一级预防而接受不适当的治疗。被诊断为痴呆或脑动脉粥样硬化、充血性心力衰竭、外周血管疾病、无慢性并发症的糖尿病和高血压的 NH 居民似乎更有可能接受不适当的抗血小板药物治疗。没有抗血小板药物应用证据的患者也会在不必要的“处方级联”中接受质子泵抑制剂治疗,应评估这些患者的停药情况。