Suppr超能文献

临床查房中传递和接收的患者安全信息分析。

Analysis of patient safety messages delivered and received during clinical rounds.

机构信息

Internal Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA

Internal Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Jul;9(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000869.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiple modalities are available to introduce patient safety training to healthcare professionals. In internal medicine, clinical rounds have always played an important role in education; however, the patient safety content taught at the point of care is not well studied. We studied, both quantitatively and qualitatively, the number and nature of patient safety messages delivered by attending physicians to determine what is taught at the point of care and how well this is recognised and recalled by attending physicians, residents and medical students.

METHODS

This prospective mixed methods study was conducted on the medicine teaching service. Clinical rounds were audio-recorded. Immediately after rounds, attending physicians, residents and students completed a short survey card identifying the number and type of educational messages they immediately recalled teaching or hearing. Independent t-test was used to compare differences in the number of messages delivered by attendings and recalled by trainees. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare differences in messages delivered by attending physicians compared with trainees. Recordings were transcribed and analysed qualitatively for patient safety content.

RESULTS

Trainees recalled more educational messages than attendings recalled teaching in all educational domains. Safety messages comprised 17.5% of educational messages. The average number of patient safety messages recalled per session was 1.08 per attending physicians, 1.84 per resident and 2.50 per student. Residents recalled 56.4% of safety messages delivered; students recalled 76.7% of safety messages.

CONCLUSION

Patient safety is a focus of teaching during clinical rounds and provides meaningful opportunities to train students and residents to practice safe patient care.

摘要

背景

有多种方式可以向医疗保健专业人员引入患者安全培训。在内科,临床查房一直是教育的重要组成部分;然而,在护理点教授的患者安全内容并没有得到很好的研究。我们从定量和定性两个方面研究了主治医生在护理点传达的患者安全信息的数量和性质,以确定在护理点教授了什么内容,以及主治医生、住院医生和医学生对这些内容的认识和回忆程度如何。

方法

这项前瞻性混合方法研究在内科教学服务中进行。临床查房进行了录音。查房结束后,主治医生、住院医生和学生立即填写一份简短的调查问卷卡片,识别他们立即回忆起的教学或听到的教育信息的数量和类型。使用独立 t 检验比较主治医生和受训者传达的信息数量的差异。使用单因素方差分析比较主治医生与受训者传达的信息的差异。记录被转录并进行定性分析,以确定患者安全内容。

结果

在所有教育领域,受训者回忆的教育信息都多于主治医生回忆的教学信息。安全信息占教育信息的 17.5%。每次查房,主治医生平均回忆起 1.08 条患者安全信息,住院医生平均回忆起 1.84 条,学生平均回忆起 2.50 条。住院医生回忆起 56.4%的安全信息,学生回忆起 76.7%的安全信息。

结论

患者安全是临床查房教学的重点,为培训学生和住院医生实施安全患者护理提供了有意义的机会。

相似文献

2
Attending rounds: What do the all-star teachers do?主治医生查房:明星教师都做些什么?
Med Teach. 2017 Jan;39(1):100-104. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1248914. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
5
Asking a Variety of Questions on Walk Rounds: a Pilot Study.巡房时提出各种问题:一项试点研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jun;33(6):969-974. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4381-2. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
7
Righting the Autonomy-Supervision Pendulum: Understanding the Impact of Independent Rounds on Medical Students, Residents, and Faculty.拨正自主权-监督钟摆:了解独立查房对医学生、住院医师和教师的影响。
Acad Med. 2020 Nov;95(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 59th Annual Research in Medical Education Presentations):S28-S36. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003645.

引用本文的文献

1
Education During Ward Rounds: Systematic Review.查房期间的教育:系统评价
Interact J Med Res. 2022 Nov 9;11(2):e40580. doi: 10.2196/40580.
2
Huddles and their effectiveness at the frontlines of clinical care: a scoping review.临床护理前沿的团队协作及其效果:综述
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Sep;36(9):2772-2783. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06632-9. Epub 2021 Feb 8.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验